Home  

Citizen of no land: The story of Kairi Shepherd

Citizen of no land: The story of Kairi Shepherd

by May 25, 2012

Kairi Shepherd, a 30 year-old Indian-origin adoptee is staring at the prospect of deportation from United States to India and says being sent back to India would end her life as she knows it.

“The deportation order which may force me to part from my physicians, family, and friends here, could be a death sentence to me,” said Shepherd, who suffers from multiple sclerosis.

Hers is a strange and tragic tale that reveals how children adopted across borders often fall through the cracks of domestic law.

Utah native Erlene Shepherd adopted a three-month-old Kairi from a Kolkata orphanage. Kairi was one of the 11 children the single mother adopted from across the globe. Erlene died when Kairi was eight.

Kairi Shepherd. File image. Image courtesy Anjali Pawar/ Sakhi

When Kairi was arrested and convicted of felony check forgery – a crime she committed to feed her drug habit – a US court and Kairi discovered that she was not a US citizen. The court then upheld the right of the US government to deport Kairi to India.

How did Kairi fall through the cracks?

To claim Kairi’s citizenship, Erlene had to submit a form with the US authorities before her adopted daughter turned 21 years old. But Erlene died without doing so, making Kairi, a nobody’s child. If parents who are technically granted legal guardianship by the sending country, don’t re-adopt their children after their arrival in the US, then their children are not US citizens.

She also does not benefit from the 2000 Child Citizenship Act, which represented a significant step forward and provided automatic citizenship for adoptees, because it does not retroactively include adult adoptees.

“The Child Citizenship Act failed to include all adoptees upon its passage in 2000 and so brought into question adoption’s most fundamental claim, a forever loving home. Adoptee vulnerability to removal and undocumented status violates an adopted person’s rights as outlined in the Hague Convention on Inter-country adoption to which the U.S. is a signatory and the UNCRC, which sending countries like India have ratified,” said Jennifer Kwon Dobbs, community adviser with AdopSource, a resource group for adoptees in the US.

Dobbs has tracked 40 cases of adult adoptees who have been deported to their countries of origin.

In 2008, Jennifer Haynes was deported from the US to India in a similar manner. Adopted by an American couple, she was sexually abused by her foster father, and spent years being shipped from one foster parent to another.

Charged in a case of drug possession, she was sent back at the age of 32. Her children- eight and nine years old- are growing up in the US without mother.

“I am away from them for more than four years now and I am not sure if I will ever see them again. What kind of law is this?” said Haynes.

The Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA), central government body which sanctions inter-country adoption says that it cannot be held responsible because it was non existent when Haynes and Shepherd were adopted. CARA was formed in 1990.

“Currently we issue conformity certificates in case of every inter-country adoption to facilitate immediate citizenship of the adopted child,” said Anu J Singh, director, CARA, adding that the Authority has written to the Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) and the US Embassy for details of the Kairi Shepherd’s case.

The MEA has been maintaining that it is looking at ways to provide legal assistance to Kairi to challenge the US order.

International Mission of Hope, the Kolkata orphanage which put Kairi in adoption, shut shop ten years ago and Kairi’s last hope is a favorable order from the US Supreme Court.

Indian adopted at 3 months faces deportation at 30

Indian adopted at 3 months faces deportation at 30

Article | May 16, 2012 - 10:05pm | By Tejinder Singh

 

Kairi Abha Shepherd/Photo obtained from Sakhee (a Pune, India-based NGO working on child rights)

Washington DC - Media outlets in India are abuzz with news of Melanie Kannokada, Miss India America 2007, arriving in Bollywood to play Seeta, an Indian girl adopted by American parents. In contrast, a real life drama is unfolding for another India-born girl, Kairi Abha Shepherd, adopted into an American family as an infant in 1982 and now facing likely deportation back to her country of origin after a recent court ruling that upheld the US federal government’s right to remove her from the country.

http://m.indianexpress.com/news/%22intercountry-licence-of-sofosh-suspended-state-yet-to-probe%22/952718/

Inter-country licence of Sofosh suspended, state yet to probe

Nisha Nambiar

State authorities are yet to conduct an inquiry into the sudden suspension of “inter-country” licence of city’s nodal adoption agency Sofosh (Society of Friends of Sassoon Hospital) by Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) — the nodal body for adoption of children in India. The Women and Child Development Commissionerate had been informed last month about the “temporary suspension” of licence.

Deputy Commissioner (Child Development) Rahul More, who was recently handed over the charge of adoptions, said, “It is a temporary suspension and action was taken after a NRI parent complained of “overcharging”. The licence has been temporarily suspended and our officials will be conducting an inquiry,’’said More.

CARA officials said the “temporary suspension” was slapped as the complaint was directly registered with them around six months back. “This is our usual procedure. The moment we get a complaint registered, we immediately suspend the inter-country licence. We can immediately restore the licence if there are no irregularities. We have also directed the state officials to check on any discrepancies,’’said a CARA official.

Adoption agency newly licensed in Kansas

Adoption agency newly licensed in Kansas

By Don Steele
Posted May 22, 2012 @ 06:00 AM

     Lifeline Children's Services recently announced that the agency has been licensed by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment to provide adoption services in the state of Kansas.
     Lifeline has offices in Topeka.
     Lisa Kelly, Kansas State Director for Lifeline, said "This license allows us to provide full-service adoptions in Kansas, including home studies and post-placement services."
     The agency is also Hague-accredited, which enables the agency to work with international adoption agencies in other countries.
     The agency, which is based in Birmingham, Ala., was founded in 1981 by John Carr, a retired social worker. Carr worked with Wales Goebel, founder of Sav-a-Life, a crisis pregnancy ministry, to create an adoption agency that would provide young girls with a means to carry their child to term and, if they so decided, a way to place the child for adoption.
     Beginning in 2000, Lifeline began developing adoption arrangements with international agencies — first in China and later in the Ukraine and Guatamala. Today, Lifeline is involved in 12 countries and plaves hundreds of orphans from around the globe into loving Christian homes.
     Families seeking to adopt through Lifeline must meet certain qualification guidelines, including parenting ability, religion, health, age, financial stability, and housing. In addition, the agency considers the couple's pregnancy plans, their work situations, any prior history of felony convictions and their marriage status.
     Families agree to attend a one-day training program and also agree to correspond with the birth family through the agency. If the birth family desires, the agency will organize a meeting with the adoptive family.
     More information about Lifeline is available at their Web site: www.lifelinechild.org.
"We are so excited to be able to help children and orphans in Kansas through this door God's opening," said Angela Beemer, administrative assistant.
     Persons seeking additional information about Lifeline Children's Services can visit their Web site or call the office at   (785) 783-4565 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            (785) 783-4565     end_of_the_skype_highlighting  .

NGOs up in arms against inter-country adoptions

NGOs up in arms against inter-country adoptions

    Published: Monday, May 21, 2012, 15:27 IST  
     By Chaitraly Deshmukh     |     Place: Pune     |     Agency: DNA   
 
Concerned over the alleged violation of fundamental rights of children, two children’s rights non-governmental organisations (NGOs), viz Thane-based Advait Foundation and Pune-based Sakhee have filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court asking for a complete ban on inter-country adoption of children.

The PIL, to be heard by the bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai, claims that the country lacks proper law for protection of the rights of children up for adoption and, hence, parliament be directed to enact proper laws and amend the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986.The date of hearing is not yet fixed.

Thus, the petitioners through their lawyers Shekhar Naphade, Amit Sharma, Kunal Cheema and Rahul Jain, have claimed that the present laws governing adoption of children in India are not in consonance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Children, 1989.

The Central government and Central Adoption and Resources Authority (Cara) have been made respondents in the PIL.
In their petition, the NGOs alleged that corruption and malpractices in the form of children allegedly being sold were rampant in inter-country adoption schemes. They claimed that children to be adopted are at times kidnapped from their biological parents.

Citing recent cases of blatant violation, the petition stated that in many states, cases are running against adoption centres for their alleged involvement in fraudulent and illegal activities.

Anjali Pawar, director of Sakhee, said that Maharashtra alone accounts for more than half of all inter-country adoptions taking place in the country. “Cases against five adoption agencies have been registered for allegedly demanding money for adoption,” she said.

The petition prays for access to all documents related to inter-country adoption in order to assess the extent of the problem in the country.

US, Europe residents lead in adoption

As per the data made available by the Central Adoption and Resources Authority (CARA), 593 children were adopted in the inter-country adoption schemes in 2010.

Majority of the children were adopted by people either in the US or Europe.


 

 

                                              +         -




 




 
      Copyright permission mandatory to republish this article.
For reprint rights click here
Top stories on DNAIndia.com »   Popular content »
 
 


C.0




 
Comments  |  Post a comment
 






 
Blogs »
Downloading blues

- Jayadev Calamur
C.0




 
©2012 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd.











Ads by Affinity





C.0



Together4change - 52 million subsidy

Publicatiedatum: 1 november 2010

Together4Change stimuleert zelfredzaamheid

Nieuwe kansen voor jongeren in ontwikkelingslanden

Nunspeet, 1 november 2010 -  De alliantie Together4Change werkt de komende vijf jaren aan het vergroten van zelfredzaamheid, veiligheid en zelfstandigheid van jongeren en gemeenschappen in kansarme gebieden in, met name, Afrika en Azië..  De vier organisaties in de alliantie, International Child Support (ICS), SOS Kinderdorpen, Wereldkinderen en Wilde Ganzen zien de samenwerking als de ultieme kans om hun krachten te bundelen en kennis te delen. Een zelfstandige toekomst voor alle mensen, dat is waar Together4Change voor staat. Centraal in de strategie van Together4Change staat dat ontwikkelingen worden gerealiseerd vanuit de mensen en maatschappij zelf, waarbij de ontwikkeling en veiligheid van jongeren en kinderen prioriteit heeft. Versterking van de lokale economie en het faciliteren van vakopleidingen voor jongeren zijn twee belangrijke uitgangspunten van het programma. Daarnaast is er speciale aandacht voor het verbeteren van de mechanismen voor kinderbescherming en van de lokale fondsenwervingcapaciteit in de programmalanden.

Geïntegreerde samenwerking

Guatemala mom seeks Mo. court help to get girl

Guatemala mom seeks Mo. court help to get girl   

Posted: Wednesday,  May 16, 2012 12:00 am                          

GUATEMALA CITY - A Guatemalan mother who says her child was stolen and later  turned over to a U.S. couple for adoption said Tuesday that she will go to a  Missouri court seeking to get her daughter back now that the U.S. State  Department has said it doesn't have jurisdiction to help return the girl.

The State Department confirmed Tuesday that it has informed Guatemala's  government that it can't help return Anyeli Hernandez Rodriguez because the U.S.  and Guatemala had not signed the Hague Abduction Convention at the time of the  alleged kidnapping in 2006.

"We're obviously deeply concerned about allegations regarding stolen children  and intercountry adoptions wherever these cases come up," State Department  spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said in a statement. "We consider the appropriate  venue in the United States for pursuing this case is in the state courts.  They're the competent organ for holding a full hearing on the merits and the  best interests of the child."

A human-rights group that has pursued the case in Guatemala's courts on  behalf of the child's biological mother, Loyda Rodriguez, said the next step  will be to find a U.S. law firm to file a civil suit charging immigration  fraud.

The group, the Survivor Foundation, doesn't allege that the adoptive couple  knew anything about the girl being kidnapped. It argues only that the adoption  in 2008 wasn't valid because of the abduction and the girl should be returned to  her biological mother.

Read more: http://azstarnet.com/news/world/guatemala-mom-seeks-mo-court-help-to-get-girl/article_643e38dd-33ae-598d-96eb-7cec33afb9df.html#ixzz1v4QIXt2m

Straf ouders voor verkopen baby J.

Straf ouders voor verkopen baby J.
Toegevoegd: 14-05-2012 11:43

De biologische ouders van een baby die werd verkocht aan een Nederlands echtpaar, krijgen een jaar voorwaardelijke celstraf. Ook moeten ze het jongetje 7500 euro betalen, precies het bedrag dat ze voor de baby kregen. Daarnaast krijgen ze een geldboete van 550 euro. Dat heeft de rechtbank in Gent bepaald.

De Belgische vader en moeder van baby J. verkochten hun kind in 2008 aan een Nederlands paar uit Sibculo (Overijssel). De rechtbank vindt dat "de commerciële handel in kinderen simpelweg niet getolereerd kan worden".

De rechtbank vindt de behandeling van het kind onterend, omdat het in de toekomst waarschijnlijk het ware verhaal over zijn afkomst zal horen.

De oma van J., die volgens de rechtbank op de hoogte was van de verkoop, kreeg acht maanden voorwaardelijk en een boete van 275 euro.

Wensouders
De jongen werd op 7 juli 2008 aangegeven bij de burgerlijke stand in Sibculo. Het kind was vier dagen eerder geboren in een ziekenhuis in Gent en op een parkeerplaats overgedragen aan de wensouders. De afgesproken prijs van 7500 euro werd in termijnen betaald.

De wensouders van J. zijn vorig jaar al bestraft. Ze werden door de rechtbank in Zwolle veroordeeld tot acht maanden voorwaardelijk, een werkstraf van 240 uur en een voorwaardelijke boete van 1000 euro.

Het jongetje is inmiddels bijna 4 jaar en verblijft in een pleeggezin.

A Home of My Own

A Home of My Own






SUNANDA MEHTASUNANDA MEHTA :  Sun Apr 09 2006, 00:00 hrs

www.indiaparenting.com

Laxmi, USA I would like to adopt a baby from Pune. Any information on this?

Shan, INDIA Already have a small girl child of my own but would like to adopt my second one. Kindly let me know of any good adoption centre in Pune.

Shilpa, ANADA My friend is adopting a baby from SOFOSH Pune and I heard they are very helpful.

 

THE REASONS are still somewhat nebu-lous,

but the inference is obvious. They are all reaching out to Pune. Far removed from its glitzy reputation as an over-publicised IT destination, pulsating with malls, multi-plexes and migrants or its standing as the most prolific education centre of the country, is a Pune that nurtures and fulfills dreams of a dif-ferent kind. It completes families.

Ask Jawahar Bekay of Bangalore or Kaushal Juneja from Gurgaon or Jose A Carrasco from Spain or any of the 500-odd parents who come to the city every year to adopt a child and they will tell you why, despite the distance, the city is just a heartbeat away from them. “Even we don’t know when and how Pune got this reputation of being the city of adoption—but it’s very apt,” says Madhuri Abhyankar, director, Society of Friends of Sassoon Hospital (SOFOSH), with its Streevasta the most respected adoption centre in the city. Started in 1964 in the Sassoon Hospi-tal premises to provide shelter to babies born and abandoned in the hospital, SOFOSH soon found its role extended to giving away babies to mothers who’d lost their own while delivering.

Swedish firm SKF stepped in to support their work and by 1973 Swedes were coming to SOFOSH to adopt children. The word spread and there was an equal influx from Holland, Canada and the US. “Earlier, Indians were adopting in secrecy or within the family, but when they saw foreigners having no issues with colour, race or background, it encouraged them,” adds Abhyankar, proud that while in the first five years, most adoptions were by for-eigners, today the statistics are quite the re-verse, with 95 per cent adoptions by Indians. “From 1974 to 2005, we have given away 2,250 children. Of these, 1,626 have gone to Indians and 624 to foreigners. Of Indians, about 55 per cent are from outside Pune,’’ adds Abhyankar.

At Bhartiya Samaj Seva Kendra (BSSK), an-other reputed adoption centre, at any given time there is a waiting list of 100 parents, while Preet Mandir, one of the city’s biggest and old-est orphanages, claims to place almost 200 children a year. Added to all this is the hearten-ing fact that the average stay of most of the children at SOFOSH from the time they come in till the time they are given for adoption, is just about four months. “The parents, however, need to wait from eight months to a year for adoption because we place children in homes only after proper inves-tigation, counseling and paperwork,” says Ab-hyankar.

“Also we stick to the fees laid down by the Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA), give parents all the details we have with us about the child, including medical problems, if any.” So is it this meticulous adherence to rules coupled with unusual sensitivity towards the child and adoptive parent that has tilted the balance in favour of Pune? “Adopting is a very emotional issue and the comfort level is very important,’’ says Neesha Ram, 38, a design en-gineer settled in San Jose, California. “When we decided to adopt, I enrolled on an NRI website and started to receive messages on the subject.

We first looked at Chennai but got horrific sto-ries about the process there. But the stuff on Pune was wonderful. We came here to see for ourselves and weren’t disappointed.” The Rams took home a baby boy two years ago and plan to come back soon for a girl. The horrific experience in Delhi drove Gur-gaon’s Kaushal Juneja to Pune. A father of three girls, Juneja’s request for a boy was turned down by three Delhi agencies. “They found it suspicious that I wanted a boy—why, for God’s sake? It doesn’t mean I’d love my daughters less. They harassed me endlessly.’’ It was finally at Pune’s Preet Mandir that the businessman found succour—and his son.

“We don’t refuse any parent a child or any child shelter—that’s our policy,” says J.S. Bhasin, managing trustee, Preet Mandir. Under the shadow last year for some media reports that had censured the home for insidious practices and a money extortion racket, something Bhasin dismisses as jealousy and petty politics, Preet Mandir is one of the few centres to promote adoption of children in the age group six to 12. “These children are not as wanted as in-fants, but we’ve placed 100 in the past two years. Now we want to move onto 12-18 years too.”

Interestingly, Bhasin feels the reasons for Pune’s reputation as a preferred adoption des-tination goes beyond the feelgood. “The li-cences of most centres in Andhra are yet to be reissued after the Hyderabad scam, and states like Bihar, MP, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Chhattis-garh and UP don’t even have a proper proce-dure in place. Where else would parents go other than Maharashtra?” Adds Nishita Shah, chairperson of Voluntary Coordination Agency that coordinates adoptions among the 10 cen-tres in Pune: “Even in Maharashtra, the proce-dure in Mumbai courts is long-drawn and you cannot leave after applying for adoption, un-like Pune where you can place the child in fos-ter care and return for the formalities later.

Pune is also a pioneer in adoption activities and its model has been replicated country-wide. Also there is this advantage of more avail-ability of children in Pune than other places, along with efficient networking between all the centres that ensures most children find proper homes and vice-versa.’’ Bhasin also has a special team that goes to mofussil areas to get abandoned children, and has devised a “single window system’’ to make adoptions quicker and easier. Except that quick is not usually top priority for most par-ents.

“It’s trust and transparency besides the quality of child care,’’ asserts Anuradha Dixit, deputy director, BSSK. A point in case being that of Jawahar Bekay, a software professional from Bangalore. “I was recommended SO-FOSH by four to five families in Bangalore who had adopted from there. What made me decide for the centre finally was the exceptional care I saw them taking of their wards. Though we had to wait 10 months to take our daughter home, it was with a lot of security, as we were walked through every detail of the adoption process.’’ They may come from all over, but their sto-ries are the same. Yet very different. Munish Keshwani came from Chennai to take a daugh-ter from Pune on the recommendation of his colleague in Citibank who had done the same.

And Seeta who was adopted by a Swedish cou-ple Kjell and Anne-Christine 30 years ago from SOFOSH came back to the centre last Novem-ber, with husband Daniel Backlund, to adopt a baby girl of her own. Surely something right, something true, is happening here. Abhyankar has the last word: “Maybe Pune’s reputation as a city of cultured and educated people also plays a part in people wanting its children. After all, adoption is as important a de-cision as marriage, more important actually.’

Adopting Alex

Adopting Alex

if you asked most parents to describe their experience of an international adoption, they’d probably respond with words like, “it was…complicated, convoluted, bureaucratic, frustrating…tedious.”

I’m probably not typical.

I would describe my experience of an international adoption from India as an adventure…an exotic foray into an ancient Asian culture.

Our story begins in ways similar to most couples that choose to adopt. We were infertile. After nine miscarriages, we made the decision to adopt a child from the country of my husband’s birth. My husband, George, is from Bangalore, in the southern part of India. Adoption from India seemed a natural choice to build our cross-cultural family. Unfortunately, adoption is a foreign concept in the Indian community and my 72-year-old mother-in-law was slow to offer encouragement.

Despite these sentiments, we forged ahead. By May of 1997, we began the long process of international adoption with Wide Horizons for Children, a 22-year-old adoption agency in Waltham, MA. Our caseworker, Homai Schmidt, was an Indian woman from New Delhi. Homai would coordinate the process of international adoption between an American couple, the orphanage in Pune, in the west of India, the Indian government and the INS.

Homai encouraged us to initiate adoption under The Hindu Adoption Act. The Hindu Adoption Act assisted non-resident Indians who lived outside the country in completing the adoption of an Indian baby. My husband was a non-resident Indian who was living in the U.S. and had recently acquired his green card. The time was ripe for an international adoption.

After the beginning, the process was very similar to most other international adoptions. We wrote our autobiographies, endured a lengthy home study complete with home inspections and family histories. We underwent thorough physical exams including an AIDS test and of course, we were fingerprinted by the FBI.

But that’s not what made an impression of me…my fingers, maybe, but not my heart.

George and I made the decision to travel to India and escort our child home. It was this journey that changed my life. After 9 months of endless paperwork, drafting affidavits of financial solvency and adequate health insurance, we received a referral for a 4 month-old baby boy named Amod. Amod is a Hindi name meaning precious.

Three months later, on May 11, 1999, we arrive in Pune, in the west of India near Bombay. We hail down an auto rickshaw, or three-wheeled motorized taxi, in the heart of this dusty city. Our auto rickshaw speeds down unpaved roads and swerves around sitting cows at the heart of every intersection. We dodged veiled women and servant girls wrapped in threadbare saris balancing bamboo baskets on their heads.

We arrive at SAFOOSH, the hospital and orphanage where our Amod was born three months earlier. Jyothi Rungi, Amod’s Hindu caseworker, meets us at the hospital entrance. Wrapped in a colorful silk sari and adorned with a red bindi on her forehead, Joythi escorts us to her office. We pour over Amod’s medical records in this tiny cement-walled office, painted a dull hospital green and poorly lit by blinking fluorescents. I hear a little cry and look up to see a thin, dark-faced nurse holding Amod at the door.

As my eyes settle on baby Amod for the first time, I experience an unexpected jolt of…panic! A series of disjointed thoughts swim through my head. He looks so frail…is he healthy? Why is his hair matted down on his head? Why is he so tiny? Why is he dressed in shorts that are too big for him? Why isn’t he smiling…doesn’t he like me?

After frantic conversations with the social worker and nurse, I am reassured that Amod is a normal and healthy baby boy who will just need time to settle into a comfortable routine with his new Mom and Dad.

In a whirlwind of papers and forms, Amod’s social worker takes us on a brief tour of the orphanage. We enter a long, tiled room with 50 cribs lined up on each side. A cluster of tiny nurses in white saris flutter between cribs changing and feeding the babies. This was where Amod had spent the first seven months of his life. Now, he’d be coming home with us!

We return to the office to learn about Amod’s birth parents. We see a picture of Amod’s birth mother with her parents. As a 17 year old girl attending university, Amod’s birth mother had become unexpectedly pregnant. She chose to put her baby up for adoption. At the age of 19, and with our permission, Amod will be able to see her picture.

Jyothi walks us thru a Hindu farewell ceremony. Spreading red henna along my parting hairline, she leads me, George and Amod in a circle for the blessing. As I soothe Amod, we’re packed into an auto richshaw at the hospital entrance and sent home to George’s cousin in Pune.

That first night with the baby was unsettling for us all. Amod cries constantly and refuses to be consoled. He has an ear infection and is running a low-grade fever. Infectious conditions were common in Indian orphanages, but completely treatable.

Early the next morning, we took a flight to Bangalore, in the south of India to meet with George’s mother, brothers, nieces and nephews. In a flurry of flowing silk saris, curried India meats and Darjeeling teas, baby Amod was embraced by loving relatives. A whirlwind of family visits, picture- taking and baptismal preparations began.

With the loving care and doting attention that only an Indian family can give, Amod was showered with gold jewelry, silk kurtaWelcome home (CUR-TA) pajamas and stuffed animals and rattles made only in India. We establish a daily routine of bathing Amod in a bucket in the tiled bathroom. Indians do not have bathtubs. They fill buckets for soaping and rinsing. His aunts begin to feed him milk, rice and dah. Dah is a lentil, high in protein and easy to swallow when cooked with milk and rice.

As our social worker predicted, Amod was not easily soothed during that first week. He needed a period of time to adjust to a white woman who speaks English. Even his Indian aunts speak Malayalam, a language of southern India and not Marathi, a western language spoken in the orphanage.

After Amod’s christening, we became frequent visitors to the Indian Embassy for review of our guardianship documents. After one week, we did get a passport for Amod to travel home to the U.S. Amod would become Alexander six months later when the adoption became final. We’d always call him Alex.

We boarded an international flight home. Although Amod was clinging to us and starting to smile, he slept fitfully in an infant crib. Twenty-two hours later, we landed in JFK. We arrived home in Connecticut at 4am. I paused at the doorstep with Amod in my arms while George snapped a “Welcome Home” picture.

We finally brought Alex home.