Home  

Adoption victim meets mother after 9 years: Deccan Chronicle

Hyderabad, Dec 26: A 17-year-old girl who was fraudulently given away in adoption when she was eight met her mother after nearly nine years. The meeting was initiated by her adoptive parents, Americans from Alabama in the United States. In 1996 Ms Lakshmi, a resident of Jogipet in Medak district, sent her two daughters Manjula and Bhagya to Action for Social Development at Gandhi Nagar in Hyderabad.

Hyderabad, Dec 26: A 17-year-old girl who was fraudulently given away in adoption when she was eight met her mother after nearly nine years. The meeting was initiated by her adoptive parents, Americans from Alabama in the United States. In 1996 Ms Lakshmi, a resident of Jogipet in Medak district, sent her two daughters Manjula and Bhagya to Action for Social Development at Gandhi Nagar in Hyderabad.

A year later, Ms Lakshmi went to the hostel to meet them but was reportedly shown her children from a distance. That was the last time that Ms Lakshmi saw her daughters. When she went to the hostel a few months later, she was reportedly told that her children had been sent abroad for higher education.

Ms Lakshmi was waiting for word from her daughters ever since. In November, suddenly, things started happening. Social activist Gita Ramaswamy, who has campaigned against inter-country adoptions got a letter from one Mr David Smolin and Ms Desiree Smolin of Alabama in the US ad-dressed to Ms Lakshmi. She traced Ms Lakshmi to Erraram village in Jogipet and gave her the letter.

The Smolins wrote that they were given Manjula and Bhagya for adoption on November 18, 1998, by John Abraham Memorial Bethany Home in Tandur. “We adopted Manjula and Bhagya, because we were told that they needed a home and a family,” Mr Smolin wrote to Ms Lakshmi. They also had to pay $5,000 for the adoption.

Adoption victim meets her mother after 9 years - Indiapulse ...

Dec. 25: A 17-year-old girl who was fraudulently given away in adoption when she was eight met her mother after nearly nine years. The meeting was initiated by her adoptive parents, Americans from Alabama in the United States. In 1996 Ms Lakshmi, a resident of Jogipet in Medak district, sent her two daughters Manjula and Bhagya to Action for Social Development at Gandhi Nagar in Hyderabad. Her neighbour in Jogipet, Fatima Bee, told her that the two children would be looked after well and given good education. She also reportedly signed some papers and paid Rs 800 for travel expenses.A year later, Ms Lakshmi went to the hostel to meet them but was reportedly shown her children from a distance. That was the last time that Ms Lakshmi saw her daughters. When she went to the hostel a few months later, she was reportedly told that her children had been sent abroad for higher education. Ms Lakshmi was waiting for word from her daughters ever since. In November, suddenly, things started happening. Social activist Gita Ramaswamy, who has campaigned against inter-country adoptions got a letter from one Mr David Smolin and Ms Desiree Smolin of Alabama in the US ad-dressed to Ms Lakshmi. She traced Ms Lakshmi to Erraram village in Jogipet and gave her the letter.The Smolins wrote that they were given Manjula and Bhagya for adoption on November 18, 1998, by John Abraham Memorial Bethany Home in Tandur. “We adopted Manjula and Bhagya, because we were told that they needed a home and a family,” Mr Smolin wrote to Ms Lakshmi. They also had to pay $5,000 for the adoption.They wrote that from the day the girls were brought to the US, they had been worried about their mother. “Manjula and Bhagya were very sad at first, but now both of them are very happy and are doing very well. They are in school and are getting an education,” he wrote.Following the efforts of Ms Ramaswamy, Mr Smolin, a professor of law at Alabama University, brought Manjula to Hyderabad in the first week of December and went to Erraram village to meet Ms Lakshmi. Manjula rushed into her mother’s arms they cried for a long time. “I never thought I would see my daughter again. I was extremely happy that my daughter has grown up and is longing to meet me even after nine years. I don’t want to lose her again,” Ms Lakshmi said.However, the last nine years had changed Manjula so much that she finds it difficult in the village. She was so disturbed that she hardly spoke to anyone. “She had even forgotten Telugu. She could not answer in detail any of our questions,” Ms Lakshmi said.Inquiries revealed that Ms Fatima Bee used to act on behalf of Action for Social Development chief N. Sanjeeva Rao and both of them conspired to sell Manjula and Bhagya to foreign couples. Since ASD had no licence at that time, it processed the papers through John Abraham Bethany Memorial Home, Tandur, and gave the girls to the Smolins. “I was forced to sign some papers and paid Rs 800 as travel expenses. Th-at’s all I remember,” Lakshmi said.After the inter-country adoption racket was busted in April 2001, the State entrusted the case to the CID. The police arrested Mr Sanjeeva Rao of Action for Social Development and Savitramma of John Abraham Bethany Memorial Home in different cases relating to child trafficking. The accused were let off on bail. The cases are still in progress.Mr Smolin said they were told many lies by Mr Sanjeeva Rao and Ms Savithri (of Tandur Home). “We didn’t know that Manjula and Bhagya had been wrongfully and illegally taken from you when we adopted them. Now, we know that certain people used trickery and lies to take them away from their home and family, and this makes us very angry,” he told Ms Lakshmi.Manjula was in the city for about 10 days and met her mother a couple of times. She left for the US last week, promising to take Ms Lakshmi there. “She promised to send Bhagya in a couple of months,” Ms Lakshmi said. Mr Sanjeeva Rao was not available for comment.\A

A

A Russian baby? That’ll be €17,000

December 18, 2005

A Russian baby? That’ll be €17,000

IRISH couples are paying up to €17,000 to international agencies to locate children for adoption in Russia. The country is now the most popular for Irish people seeking to adopt abroad, even though there is no adoption treaty between Ireland and Russia.

The payment of such large fees has been criticised by the chairman of the International Adoption Agency, who says the Irish government should take measures to stop it.

“I find the issue of money in relation to this process distasteful,” said Kevin O’Byrne. “Intercountry adoption should be done through state-to-state agreement. We’re talking about children. The state has a responsibility to them and I don’t think the Department of Foreign Affairs has been active enough in establishing an agreement.”

Of the 398 intercountry adoptions last year, 189 were from Russia. This was three times more than the figure in 2000. A sound legal system, Caucasian children and a relatively speedy adoption process are being cited as reasons for Russia’s popularity.

“Russian people are very similar to the Irish in manner and culture,” said Derek Farrell of Irish Families for Russian Adoptions. “They like to sing, they like to drink. Sadly there are a lot of children for adoption but I would be positive about Russia because of its child protection laws.”

The ending of intercountry adoption from Romania and Belarus has also encouraged Irish people to turn to Russia. Romania has stopped adoptions due to pressures from the EU.

Ireland has bilateral agreements with China, Vietnam, Thailand and the Philippines. For couples adopting from Vietnam it can cost up to $8,000 (€6,600). From China, Thailand or the Philippines, the cost can be $1,500 (€1,250). The Adoption Board has sought a meeting with its Russian counterpart to discuss putting arrangements in place.

The lack of a treaty with Russia is not holding Irish couples back, however. Once they are declared fit by Irish authorities, many adopt independently in Russia. The absence of an agreement means some rely on expensive agencies, however.

“The downside is the presence of third-country adoption agencies,” agreed Farrell. “They charge huge amounts — to my knowledge one charges €16,800 as an international adoption fee. We’re a voluntary group accredited by the Adoption Board who assist people to adopt independently without charge.”

Annette and John Kenny from Cork adopted from Russia through Farrell’s group. Their sons, Simon, 6, and Luke, 5, were adopted from the same orphanage at the age of three.

“A friend of ours already had children from Russia and we saw how well they were progressing,” said Annette Kenny. “That confirmed Russia for us.

“We didn’t want to go through an agency and we got in touch with Derek and his wife Olga, who is Russian. It was more personal, not like a business.”

The existence of bilateral agreements with other countries does influence some couples, however. “One of the factors was the bilateral agreement,” said Shane Downer from Rathfarnham in Dublin who has applied to adopt from Vietnam.

“There is a facilitator there at the moment and the process is relatively clear and straightforward. When we applied, the referral times were three to six months, although that has now extended to six to 12 months.”

There has been an increase in adoptions from countries with a bilateral agreement — China went from 16 in 2000 to 60 in 2004. Vietnam peaked in 2003 at 39, dipping the following year after the Vietnamese suspended adoptions.

“Vietnam opened up and was discovered in 2000, and then it basically closed,” said Kiernan Gildea, the Adoption Board registrar. “It decided to review its procedures. We went out in 2003 to negotiate a new treaty which is in operation now.”

Time is also a factor in determining where people go to adopt a child. The assessment process in Ireland for eligibility can take between 18 months and three years, with more than 1,800 couples waiting to be assessed.

“What determines where people go is how soon they can effect the adoption,” said O’Byrne. “They will have been waiting on a health board assessment for up to three years, and once they have their documentation they will want to go to the place that can effect an adoption as expeditiously as possible.”

Some parents feel that a Caucasian or European child will feel more at home in Ireland. Farrell said this was one reason why Russia was increasingly popular. “The children are also well looked after in Russia, they’re good healthy children,” he said. “The process tends to be more transparent. You’re allowed into orphanages, which isn’t the case everywhere.”

Ann McElhinney, a journalist who has made a number of television documentaries about international adoption, said that although prospective parents are thoroughly checked out in Ireland, the weak link is the process used in the countries they adopt from.

“These adoptions cost large sums of money — which are absolute fortunes in impoverished countries such as Vietnam or some regions of Russia,” she said. “Besides being impoverished, these countries also are similar in that they are all internationally acknowledged as being among the most corrupt on the planet.

“Despite the rigorous checks and good intentions of Irish adoptive parents they can not be sure that the child is really available for adoption.”


Blog: Ana (left) with Kael and Juliet from Kidsave in Austin

Ana (left) with Kael and Juliet from Kidsave in Austin

Posted by Angelica Santacruz at 8:47 AM 0 comments Links to this post

Baker Victory Sends Dossier to Colombia

On December 14, my paperwork went to Colombia. While the courts will be closed from December 15, 2005 to January 15, 2006, the documents will be translated during this time.

Posted by Angelica Santacruz at 8:42 AM 0 comments Links to this post

U.S. Backs European Request for Romanian Adoptions To Proceed

16 December 2005
U.S. Backs European Request for Romanian Adoptions To Proceed
European Parliament, United States ask that pending adoptions be resolved

 

 

 

By Vince Crawley
Washington File Staff Writer

The United States has welcomed a vote by the European Parliament asking that Romania resolve international-adoption cases registered during Romania’s 2001-2004 moratorium on foreign adoptions "with the goal of allowing inter-country adoptions to take place, where justified and appropriate …."
“We call upon the Romanian government to use transparent and objective criteria in resolving these cases in a manner that serves the best interests of the individual children involved,” State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said in a December 16 statement.
“The goal should be to find permanent, loving homes for the children,” McCormack said.
Under pressure from the European Union (EU), Romania in 2001 imposed a moratorium on foreign adoptions after allegations of corruption of officials involved in the adoption process. In 2004, Romania passed a law banning adoptions by all foreigners except relatives of the children. That law went into effect January 1, 2005.
However, the United States and other countries have asked that the Romanian government allow the completion of adoption procedures that already were under way when the restrictions went into effect. Some 1,100 children, most of whom live in state-run orphanages, are affected. (See related article.)
The U.S.  Helsinki Commission, which monitors human rights, held a hearing September 14 to highlight the problem of the pending adoptions. (See related article.)
Radio Free Europe reported December 14 that Romania Prime Minister Calin Popescu-Tariceanu stands by the current adoption law and said authorities will instead promote adoptions within the country. Popescu-Tariceanu said the new law meets EU standards “which put the children’s interest first, and not those of the possible adoptive parents.”
In April, the European Union signed an accession treaty with Romania with the goal of membership in January 2007. However, the EU has warned that Romania’s accession by that date is not guaranteed and depends on making substantial progress in dealing with issues of corruption, competition and the country’s judicial system.
On December 15, the European Parliament, which monitors human rights in Eastern and Central Europe, called on Romania to resolve international adoption cases that had been registered during the 2001-2004 moratorium. The European Parliament said these cases should be resolved “with the goal of allowing inter-country adoptions to take place, where justified and appropriate.”
(The Washington File is a product of the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



Read more: http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2005/December/20051216170414mvyelwarc0.8375666.html#ixzz1EOuRzVEM

Forum: members-l] Synopsis of Symposium on Children Without Parental Care

members-l] Synopsis of Symposium on Children Without Parental Care Chronological Thread < Chronological > < Thread > Reply to sender to list From: Hwall334@aol.com To: members-L@lists.jcics.org Subject: [members-l] Synopsis of Symposium on Children Without Parental Care 

Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:08 EST 2nd World Conference on Children without Parents November 9-11, 2005 Boston (Worcester), Massachusetts, USA Conference Synopsis The conference launched on Wednesday, November 9. 2005, at 9:00 a.m., in Worcester, Massachusetts, USA. The conference marked the second gathering of international child welfare policy and decision-making professionals aimed at exchanging information about the realities of children without parents on a global scale. The functional goal of the conference was not only the exchange of critical information but to outline and begin to establish globally accepted best practices for more efficient programs and policies that serve the "best interest of a child" in need. The organizations supporting the conference through sponsorship and participation were International Advocates for Children (IAC), Focus on Adoption (FOA), and Center for Adoption Research (CAR). 

The Harvard University Law School Child Advocacy Program sponsored one of the key workshops and debates on the school campus. The attendees of the conference included child welfare policymakers, government officials in charge of child welfare infrastructures, researchers and experts from the fields of law, medicine, psychology, economics, and decision science, and non-governmental organizations. These stakeholders represented 31 countries including Azerbaijan, Netherlands, Vietnam, Mexico, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, Republic of Georgia, New Zealand, Italy, Germany, Argentina, Lesotho, Sweden, Armenia, Moldova, Ukraine, Romania, Pakistan, Mongolia, The Philippines, Russia, Kazakhstan, Bahamas, USA, Nicaragua, Latvia, Hungary, Poland, Belgium and Thailand. The meeting commenced with Lynda Lee Smith, Executive Director of IAC, welcoming the 115 delegates with sentiments of thanks to all of the countries and hope for the positive influence that this group can have in the future of children without parents. Hannah Wallace, President of Focus on Adoption, followed with her expressions of support for IAC's efforts and hope for real outcomes from the conference. Debra Chaison-Demers, Executive Director of Center for Adoption Research at the University of Massachusetts, wrapped up the welcome with her support based on the success of the 2004 conference in Atlanta and her hope that this conference would result in even further steps being made in the efforts for children without parents. 

The first two speakers were Justin Webb, age 14, adopted from Romania at one month old, and Larry Adams, age 56, who grew up in the "temporary" foster care system in the US from birth to adulthood without the benefits of a permanent family in his life. These two gentlemen were present during the conference to represent the "voice of the child" throughout the conference and to make certain that all discussions were focused on "best interest of child" from the child's perspective and NOT the adult perspective. Mr. Jacob Doek, Chairman of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), a lawyer, and a judge, followed as keynote speaker. Mr. Doek focused his talk on The Need for Clarification of Conventions, Data Collection, and Reporting of Factual Information. He defined children without parental care to include orphans, social orphans, abandoned children, street children, AIDS orphans, and generally children without parental care. He noted the difficulty in collecting accurate data on a global scale and the reporting of factual information in regards to the reality of children without parental care. He specifically pointed out that all options for children must be considered and that the options for children vary based on the country. He placed emphasis on the option of intercountry adoption stating that while intercountry adoption benefits a small percentage of the total global group of children without parental care other options must be available for the majority of children in which intercountry adoption is not an option for many reasons. Making reference to children in Africa being left as head of households for entire sibling groups due to the AIDS epidemic, he challenged the group to develop and support best practices that offer solutions for all children in need of parental care. Dr. Mary Hansen, Professor of Economics at American University, and a research fellow at Center for Adoption Research, discussed the Economics of Policy-Making. Dr. Hansen presented an interesting perspective on making decisions and choosing options for children without parental care. She presented charts to show the cost to governments for making certain options and a need for achieving a balance in options for children based on the financial resources available from the government. Based on available financial resources, she demonstrated how some options become more viable than others to achieve. These factors must be considered when building child welfare models for specific countries. Dr. Sara Dillon, Professor of Law at Stanford University, addressed the Misperceptions of Intercountry Adoption. She gave specific examples of misleading information that has been fed to the media and government officials concerning intercountry adoptions. This information has lead to mistrust and ultimately a negative image of intercountry adoption. The majority of accusations are absolutely false and a few are based on exceptions to the rule. She stressed that the majority of intercountry adoptions are a great success and a wonderful option for children in need of parents. She holds a few of the key global children's organizations responsible for supporting and feeding the misinformation and not taking action to collect the facts. 

Lynda Smith, IAC Executive Director, and Maarten Brekelmans, General Manager of the Dutch IAC office, gave a brief introduction to the creation of a world council to be discussed in more detail the final day of the conference. The overview served to allow the delegates to consider the proposal prior to the final discussion. Rodolfo Rivera, international lawyer, spoke on the Practical Aspects of Implementing the Hague Convention. He pointed out the key areas that are vague and have lead to misinterpretation by many ratifying countries. There are those who believe that the Hague Treaty is the answer to eliminating the "sale of children," while others believe it is an unnecessary and ineffectual "cure." Has it hurt more than helped? The pro and anti Hague factions all agree on one thing--the best interest of the child is paramount. The differences arise in defining just what "best interest" means and the manner in which it will be implemented. Dr. Tom Whalen, Professor of Fuzzy Logic (decision science) at Georgia State University, presented How to Know What to Do showing the history of man's evolution of decision-making tools going back to the development of the lead pencil. The walk through the development and advancement of decision making tools allowed delegates to realize the limitations of the human brain in making complex decisions such as a placement decision for a child. Over the past century, the advancement of tools has expanded the abilities of the human mind to "juggle" multiple considerations. Today, with technology combined with decision science principles, critical decisions such as weighting options for a child placement can be accurately suggested based on an unlimited number of criteria. A series of workshops were then held: 1) Professor Rene Hoksbergen, Professor of Psychology at Utrecht University; Netherlands, conducted a workshop on the Effects of Neglect. 2) Dr. Tom Whalen, Professor of Fuzzy Logic at Georgia State University, USA, conducted a workshop on Screening Families, Placing Children: an Exercise with Tools of Thought. 3) Dr. Sara Dillon, Professor of Law at Suffolk University, USA, conducted a workshop on In-depth into the Misperceptions of Intercountry Adoptions. 4) Dr. Mary Hansen, Professor of Economics at the American University, USA, conducted a workshop on Country Specific Issues. 5) Dr. Monica Bouman, Psychologist in the Netherlands, and Maarten Brekelmans, General Manager of the IAC Dutch office, conducted a workshop on Lasting Solutions and Serving Leadership. The delegates then attended Harvard University Law School for an open debate with Mr. Jacob Doek, Chairman of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child and Dr. Jane Aronson, Adoption Medicine Specialist, facilitated by Dr. Elizabeth Bartholet, Harvard Professor of Law. The debate clearly showed two different perspectives on solutions for children without parents. Mr. Doek's perspective naturally indicated a strong need for policy implementation and working through the existing government structure while Dr. Aronson emphasized a need for an "on the ground" approach with little dependence on government assistance. Law students from Harvard Law School joined the delegates in a series of questions for the two experts after the debate. On the final day of the conference, country delegates were offered an opportunity to share reports from their respective countries. Over ten countries shared a brief overview of the current situation on children without parents during this time. Susanna Luarca, attorney in Guatemala, presented Efficiency in Placement highlighting many of the challenges specifically in Guatemala. The core of the presentation focused on the ability of the child welfare system to place infants and young children in permanent families in a timely manner. The emphasis on time to placement results in less psychological trauma to the child and promotes the best interest of the child. 

The Speech of Honorable Christopher H. Smith of New Jersey on the U. S. House of Representatives. December 14, 2005.

Romanian Adoption

The Speech of Honorable Christopher H. Smith of New Jersey on the U. S. House of Representatives. December 14, 2005.

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, last month I introduced a resolution, H. Res. 578, expressing disappointment that the Government of Romania has instituted a virtual ban on intercountry adoptions that has very serious implications for the welfare and well-being of orphaned or abandoned children in Romania . As Co-Chairman of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (the Helsinki Commission), I am pleased to be joined as original cosponsors by the Commission's Ranking House Member, Representative CARDIN, fellow Commissioners Representative PITTS and PENCE as well as Chairman of the International Relations Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere Representative BURTON, and Representative NORTHUP, COSTELLO, JO ANN DAVIS, TIAHRT, BRADLEY and FRANK.

Mr. Speaker, the children of Romania , and all children, deserve to be raised in permanent families. Timely adoption of H. Res. 578 will put the Congress on record:

Supporting the desire of the Government of Romania to improve the standard of care and well-being of children in Romania ;

Barnardo’s moderniser

Barnardo’s moderniser

December 9, 2005 in Workforce

Curriculum Vitae

Born: 1942, Sheffield.

Educated: City grammar school, Sheffield and Leeds University.

Nachwuchs auf Bestellung

Archiv » 2005 » 08. Dezember » Vermischtes

Textarchiv

Nachwuchs auf Bestellung

Kinder aus Haiti werden gern von Ausländern adoptiert. Inzwischen ist das ein Geschäft geworden

Klaus Ehringfeld

Stratham woman among those shut out of Romanian adoption

STRATHAM—Rep. Jeb Bradley, in response to an article in today's Bucharest (Romania) Daily News, said that he's extremely disappointed with that government's failure to approve pending international adoptions.

He added, however, that he had not received official confirmation of the denial.

Several of the adoptions have involved New Hampshire families including Allyson Schaaf of Stratham, who in 2002 began the process to adopt Natasha, a Romanian orphan.

Bradley, Schaaf and others including members of the Windham, N.H.-based group Nobody's Children have lobbied Romania's president and other high-ranking officials to approve some 200 adoptions by American families.

Today the Bucharest newspaper says authorities will not approve the 1,100 international adoption requests received the past four years.