Home  

Romania: allo stadio 40.000 bambini abbandonati

<<indietro

Romania: allo stadio 40.000 bambini abbandonati

Migliaia di bambini abbandonati entrano uno ad uno nello stadio, l’ultimo però non trova posto. Sullo sfondo, nel frattempo, un contatore rivela il numero dei bambini presenti, più di 40.000. Poi, il messaggio finale, un appello fatto dalla voce di un bambino: “Voglio anch’io i miei genitori”.

E’ questo lo spot che da alcuni giorni viene trasmesso dall’emittente nazionale rumena ProTV, che ha avviato una vera e propria campagna di sensibilizzazione per attirare l’attenzione sul fenomeno estremamente grave dell’abbandono infantile e sulla difficile legislazione che non facilita e non incoraggia l’adozione dei bambini abbandonati. 

Lo spot televisivo in onda in questi giorni ha colpito per la sua forza e per come descrive in modo efficace un problema, quello dell’abbandono, che da anni affligge la Romania. Ogni 6 ore, un bambino è abbandonato, ogni anno vengono abbandonati almeno 1.300 minori e solo la metà di questi trova una famiglia, il resto è costretto a vivere in orfanotrofi.

La campagna avviata ha suscitato forti reazioni tra gli spettatori di Pro Tv, i quali non sono rimasti indifferenti al dramma dei circa 40.000 bambini abbandonati del paese ed hanno firmato su www.stirileprotv.ro la petizione con la quale chiedono una legge corretta ed efficiente delle adozioni in Romania.

Nella petizione viene inoltre specificato e sostenuto il fatto che un bambino, appena abbandonato dai genitori, debba avere la possibilità di essere accolto da quelli che vogliono e possono farlo, indifferentemente dal fatto se siano cittadini rumeni o stranieri.

Tra gli obiettivi anche sensibilizzare le autorità per poter avere una semplificazione della procedura adottiva, per poter togliere i bambini dai centri di accoglienza, per poter creare dei Tribunali per i Minorenni in tutti i judet (regioni) della Romania, per rivalutare le adozioni internazionali, portando all’attenzione pubblica i modelli promossi da altri paesi che danno bambini in adozione internazionale.

Condividi su:

Pictures of hope

Last updated: 2/25/2011 13:00

Cao Thi Thu (R) and Cao Thi Hong with pictures of their missing children allegedly stolen for adoption to Italy from Vietnam's Ruc community.
Years after their sons and daughters were 'stolen' and adopted abroad without their consent, a number of Vietnamese parents have finally been shown proof the children are alive and well. Now, their poor hill-tribe villagers face a moral dilemma.
At first glance, it looks like an ordinary family picture: a doting Caucasian father hovers over his two adopted Asian daughters in the living room of a comfortable suburban home. He holds the younger girl gently by her shoulders.

All three beam contentedly at the camera.

In a ramshackle home on Vietnam's border with Laos, Cao Thi Thu looks at the image of her daughters with a mixture of joy and pain.

"I am just so relieved to see their faces again and to know they are alive," says Thu, 37. "But my daughters were stolen from me and I want them to come home. My heart is broken. I miss them so much."

For three long years, Thu has struggled to find out what happened to her two little girls. Officials had promised to educate and raise them in a children's home in the provincial capital; instead, they sent the girls to live with adoptive parents in Italy.

The two girls - Lan, now eight and Luong, 13, - were among 13 children taken from the Ruc hill tribe in Vietnam's Quang Binh Province in 2006 and sent overseas.

Early last year, the scandal was exposed by the South China Morning Post.

Like Thu, all of the parents had agreed to let their children attend the home, 100 kilometers away in Dong Hoi, after being visited by officials who offered the youngsters a better start in life. When the parents went to visit their children in early 2008, however, they were told they had been adopted overseas. Illiterate and only able to sign their names in a scrawl, the parents say they were tricked into signing papers that gave authorities permission to sell their children to families overseas.

Now officials in both Vietnam and Italy appear to be taking the case seriously, albeit with a degree of reluctance. A police investigation has acknowledged mistakes and irregularities in the handling of the adoptions and a new official inquiry has been launched in Vietnam, which Italian officials say they'll monitor.

The head of the children's home has personally apologized to Thu and the other Ruc. The officials have shown the aggrieved parents photos of their children living in their adoptive homes. The photos offered them the first real evidence since their disappearance that their children are alive and well.

Determined to fight

As the families prepared for a fifth Lunar New Year holiday separated from their offspring, however, they remained determined to fight for their children's return.

On a misty January afternoon, Thu arrived at a quiet café, eight kilometers from her home and produced a plastic bag from the folds of her coat containing photographs and documents detailing her children’s whereabouts.

Her desperation has been replaced by hope - hope that rests in the crumpled photographs of her daughters that she obtained during a meeting with officials in November, when an apology was given by the new director of the children's home.

"I was so happy to see my daughters again but the officials didn't even tell me where they are," Thu says. "They just gave us these pictures to look at.”

Two factors seem to have pressured officials into apologizing to the Ruc families and giving them information: Vietnamese and regional newspapers taking up the Post's story and the persistence of the parents.

Cao Thi Hong, 56, was instrumental in organizing the parents and petitioning the local government. Hong was already a widow when her daughter, Bich, then aged 14, and son, Cao Duc Buoi, then aged 10, were taken to the children's home. Bich, now 19, is the oldest of the missing children.

"They told us the government wanted to support poor families by taking their children to the local children's center and providing them with food and education," she says. "They said the children would return to the village with a good education and help support their families. So, of course, we agreed.

"I was struggling on my own and I believed them. My son and daughter went to Dong Hoi in 2006. I went to visit them twice but the third time I went, they were gone. I demanded to know where they were and I went up to see the director [Nguyen Tien Ngu].

“He told me my children had been very lucky. They had been chosen to go overseas to be educated in foreign languages. He told me it was a real privilege for me and my family that they had been chosen - he said I should be very proud and told me, `Not many children get this opportunity.”‘

Hong says she is angry at herself for accepting the director's word.

“I began to realize I had been tricked and that my children had been sold for adoption,” she said. “I felt terrible. My children had been stolen from me and I felt cheated. Then I got angrier and angrier and I decided to do something about it."

No answer

Last summer, Hong gathered the eight affected families together for a series of meetings and then - with the help of a daughter and son-in-law who could write - sent a petition to the local authorities demanding to be told what happened to the 13 children. Copies of their petition were sent to some of Vietnam's state-run newspapers. The petition gave momentum to the parents' case, forcing officials to publicly admit irregularities in the adoption process and to apologize.

At the November meeting, Hong held the pictures of her children for a few minutes before being forced to hand them back.

"When I saw the photographs, I was so happy to see them looking healthy and well," she says. "But I'm worried that they will enjoy the life there and never want to come back. I just want to see them again. I am getting old and I am afraid I will die before I see them again."

They may have been young as far as Hong is concerned, but they were not young enough for some. The ages of both children were changed on official papers from the children's home. Documents we saw show Bich's birth year as 1997, instead of the actual 1992, while Buoi s had been changed to 1998, from 1995.

The families believe the ages were altered to make the children more attractive to adoptive parents and to dodge a legal requirement in Vietnam for children over nine to sign papers agreeing to an overseas adoption. In the case of Thu's children, the two girls' family name has been changed from Cao, a distinctive hill-tribe name, to Tran, which is common in Vietnam. The age of the older girl was changed by two years, to make her appear six years old instead of eight.

Deliberate alterations to the children’s adoption profiles were referred to in a police report released at the end of last year as "irregularities" and "mistakes" in the adoption process. The report concluded, however, that there was no corruption.

"I don't trust the police investigation. They lied," Thu says. "At the meeting in November, the man who was director of the orphanage at the time all this happened [Nguyen Tien Ngu] was there. I told him, `You sold our children. How would you feel if this had happened to your children?' He just sat there. He had no answer."

The current director of the children's home, Le Thi Thu Ha, who issued the apology to the parents in November, refuses to discuss the case.

Italian response

Italian officials appear divided about what to do next.

"The embassy is not in the condition to retrieve contacts with adopted children,” Ambassador Lorenzo Angeloni wrote, via e-mail. “By law, we are not allowed to do this."

Ariete did not respond to e-mails from Post Magazine but Daniela Bacchetta, vice-president of the Italian Commission for International Adoptions, wrote that "the dossiers on the 13 children have been thoroughly examined and appear to be flawless.

"We await the findings of the investigations by the Vietnamese authorities. Should the outcome of the investigation carried out by the Vietnamese authorities confirm the assumptions of irregularities, we would agree on the steps to take with the Vietnamese central authority."

Bacchetta visited Vietnam in December, to discuss Italian adoptions. She declined to say if the matter of the Ruc children was raised. She did confirm that the Italian authorities have made no attempt to contact the parents or investigate the matter within Vietnam, and says her office only learnt of the identities of the 13 children in December, despite having first been alerted to the case in 2008.

"The woman from the children's center told us our children were in Italy,” Thu said as she pores through the documents she’s managed to cobble together. “I have no idea where Italy is and they wouldn't give us phone numbers or addresses to get in touch with them. They just say, `Send a letter to us and we'll send it to your children' - but why should we believe them after everything that's happened?”

In the course of the interview, reporters from the Post recognized, among the documents, a list of the names and addresses of all of the adopted children. Hong and Thu light up and immediately begin drafting letters to their children aloud.

"I'll ask them, `What is it like in Italy? How are your studies going?' I'll tell them how much I miss them and I'll ask them whether they can come home to see me," smiles Thu. She pauses before adding quietly: "I know it's not all that simple. I realize it's their decision now and they must decide. But it will be wonderful to be in contact with my children again."

Pictures of hope 
Last updated: 2/25/2011 13:00 
Cao Thi Thu (R) and Cao Thi Hong with pictures of their missing children allegedly stolen for adoption to Italy from Vietnam's Ruc community.

 

Haiti Presidential Decree to Tighten International Adoptions

Haiti Presidential Decree to Tighten International Adoptions

PRESIDENT MICHEL MARTELLY [FILE]

PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti - President Michel Martelly will issue a decree to make law the adoption of Haitian children subject to institutional processes.

The law had begun forming during the Preval administration and has passed a vote in the Chamber of Deputies but is awaiting passage in the Senate.

As the nation is awaiting the ratification of a prime minister, the vote in the Senate is postponed. The President, believing no time can be wasted on the matter, will enact the decree in the meantime.

"While waiting for a vote on this law, a delay I hope will be as short as possible, I intend to issue a presidential decree making it obligatory for adoption applications to go through authorized organisms, as the Hague Convention outlines," Martelly was quoted.

The measure will effectively ban private adoptions, the President concluded.

Spain probes 849 cases of alleged baby trafficking

Spain probes 849 cases of alleged baby trafficking

 

Published: Friday, Jun. 17, 2011 - 12:40 pm
Last Modified: Friday, Jun. 17, 2011 - 1:41 pm

Spanish prosecutors are investigating 849 cases of newborn children stolen from their mothers and sold to other families for profit, the country's attorney general said Friday.

Candido Conde-Pumpido said 162 cases had already been referred for trial and only 38 have been dropped for a lack of evidence.

It is well documented that babies were taken from women who had supported the defeated Republican side after Spain's 1936-39 civil war. However, some of the baby trafficking cases are as recent as the mid-1990s.

"A great many Spaniards" had been affected by the scandal, which took place "over a prolonged period of time," Conde-Pumpido said at a news conference.

His office was alerted to the cases by ANADIR, an association of people searching for lost children or parents.

Enrique Vila, a lawyer representing ANADIR, said what had begun as a politically motivated punishment for Republican sympathizers eventually became a purely moneymaking scheme that persisted illegally well past Spain's return to democracy in 1978.

Investigating magistrate Baltasar Garzon has calculated there could have been 30,000 baby thefts in Spain in the wake of the civil war.

Vila has argued that there was more or less a nationwide network behind it, involving doctors, nurses, midwives, nuns and intermediaries that would find children for couples that wanted them. Mothers were told that their babies were stillborn.

"It is not possible to attribute this to a single organization," said Conde-Pumpido, speaking in the eastern city of Valencia following a meeting with prosecutors general from Spain's 17 autonomous regions.



Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/17/3708944/spain-probes-849-cases-of-alleged.html#ixzz1PdcnFskG

Babies just another commodity

Babies just another commodity

9:55 am In rural Nepal, where the going rate for a healthy orphan is US$6000 ($7449), about 600 children are missing.

They were taken by agents who came to the villages promising parents they would educate the children and give them a better life in the capital, sometimes for a steep fee. The children never returned.

Between 2001 and 2007, hundreds of Nepali children with living parents were falsely listed as orphans and adopted by high-paying Western couples a world away.

One widow, according to the child protection charity Terre des Hommes, was unable to feed her seven children and sent them to an urban "child centre", where three were quickly adopted without her consent by rich Westerners.

Another, Sunita, was told by sneering authorities she would never see her child again. She doused herself in kerosene and struck a match.

Tens of thousands of babies, toddlers and young children are now adopted across international borders every year, according to Unicef.

The Nepali adoption industry is part of a broader child-trafficking trend which saw some "orphans" from the rural provinces of Humla and Jumla sold to circuses.

Western prospective parents, however, are the preferred revenue stream. Adoption brought US$2 million a year into the country before 2007, when the programme was suspended pending an inquiry that uncovered many cases of abduction and improper financial gain.

Nepal is not the only country where international conventions on the rights of children have been breached as unscrupulous middlemen trade toddlers like livestock to desperate Western couples.

The process is simple: parents in Europe and America contact an adoption agency in the country of their choice, either privately or via a home agency.

Money changes hands, and their papers and the papers of the child are checked, the latter being easy to falsify. More money changes hands, and the child goes home with new parents.

Many of these adoptions are legitimate, beneficial and bring nothing but joy to the new parents and hope to the child. But there is another side. The possibilities for corruption and backhand profit are immense, because the emotional stakes are so high.

"When people want something so very much, like a baby, the amount of money they are prepared to throw at it can be limitless," said Andy Elvin of Children and Families Across Borders.

"In some countries, those amounts of money on offer mean that people do things they wouldn't otherwise do, and that's the problem."

According to Terre des Hommes, there is now, in many cases, "an industry around adoption in which profit, rather than the best interests of the child, takes centre stage".

The business is a seller's market, because there are far fewer orphans in need of adoption than Western prospective parents wishing to adopt.

Although many children adopted in this way do enjoy loving, stable homes with their new families, the number of truly "adoptable children" in overseas orphanages is smaller than the number of prospective parents.

Even in the aftermath of wars and natural disasters, those without a single relative to provide proper care is insufficient to meet the demand for exotic orphans.

After the tsunami in Japan, many Westerners inquired as to when and how they would be able to adopt a tsunami orphan, only to be told any child left parentless would be rehoused with extended family.

There is sometimes a distinct missionary element to this charity.

Christian lobby groups exhort congregations to demonstrate their faith by adopting foreign orphans from countries that know neither Jesus nor Walmart. Networks exist to help individual ministries organise funds to pay the orphanages and middlemen who supply the babies.

Last year, 10 Southern Baptists "obeyed God's calling" by smuggling 33 Haitian children - most solicited from living parents - across the Dominican border to await adoption by American believers.

All were jailed for a time but Christian adoption lobbies in the United States are putting increasing political pressure on organisations such as Unicef to ratify their agenda rather than raising ethical issues about the human rights of the children involved.

There are more mundane reasons why Western couples might wish to adopt overseas rather than be matched with one of the tens of thousands of children in need of adoption at home (many of whom do not match, in age or background, the ideal child some would-be parents want).

One Ukrainian tourist website boasts that "Ukraine has very few restrictions" and adds that unlike many countries, which seek to eliminate unfairness with rigorous matching systems, "prospective parents have the chance to choose the child they wish to adopt".

"Ukrainian children are typically family-oriented, caring, make attachments easily," enthuses the site, as if it were selling a new breed of house pet. "They look to their new parents with adoration."

Elvin, of Children and Families Across Borders, said: "There is an almost inexhaustible demand for very young children to adopt. People looking to adopt are generally looking to adopt children under the age of 3, and preferably under the age of 1. That's your essential problem.

"In America, which is the biggest importer, if you like, there are 23,000 children in the foster system waiting for adoption, but most of them will be aged 5 to 16. There's a very rich, powerful and well-resourced inter-country adoption lobby in the US."

The leading supplier of babies for adoption is China, which sent 5078 children abroad in 2009. It used to be Vietnam, then Guatemala (at one point one in every 100 babies there was sent for adoption to the US). Ethiopia, which until recently, was sending 50 children daily out of the country, announced a clampdown in March. No one knows where the agencies and parents will turn next.

Infant income

* In 2009, the last year for which reliable figures are available, the top five adopting countries took in 24,839 children from overseas.

* Half of these, 12,753, went to the US, with Italy taking 3964, Spain and France around 3000 each, and Canada 2122.

* China, the leading source of babies for adoption, sent 5078 children abroad in 2009.

* Russia sent 4039 and 4564 came from Ethiopia, one of a range of countries which, through lax regulation, had a vogue as a ready source of babies.

- INDEPENDENT

Ethiopian Adoption Update!!!

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 15, 2011

Ethiopian Adoption Update!!!

We just got an Update from our Adoption Agency!

We are pleased to announce that the Ethiopian Ministry of Women's Youth and Children's Affairs (MOWYCA) have decided to increase the number of files to be reviewed on a daily basis. As of June 15, 2011

the number of files

will increase

from five(5) files per day

to ten (10) files per day.

During the next two to three months the Ministry plans to

increase the number of files reviewed to

fifteen (15) files per day

as they complete the system improvement goals that they have previously outlined for themselves.



For anyone that doesn't know the details...

that's ok.

All you need to know is that

it's WONDERFUL news!

Answered pray!

Praising Him!

Surinamereis mei 2006


Surinamereis mei 2006


Surinamereis mei 2006
 
Contact bureau Familierechtelijke Zaken en andere instellingen

Afgelopen meivakantie zijn wij, Marlies Lambers (voorzitter van Meiling) en Elza van Vliet (landencontactpersoon Suriname) in Suriname geweest.

We hebben in Suriname verschillende instanties bezocht, waaronder Bureau Familierechtelijke Zaken en het ministerie.

Zoals misschien wel bekend is het aantal adopties vanuit Suriname sinds april 2005 terug gelopen en hebben we helaas nog maar drie kindjes kunnen voorstellen.

Voor ons was niet duidelijk wat daar de oorzaak van was. Dit was dus een belangrijk gesprekspunt. Helaas zijn we niet met goede berichten naar huis gekomen.

In Suriname zijn ze bezig om meer kindjes in eigen land op te vangen, zij willen daarvoor de mogelijkheden voor pleegzorg verder uitbouwen. Dit heeft tot gevolg dat er minder kinderen voor adoptie in aanmerking gaan komen.

Als Meiling staan wij daar achter. Ieder kind wat op een goede manier opgevangen kan worden in het eigen land, daar zijn we blij mee. We hopen echter dat daardoor toch geen kinderen buiten de boot gaan vallen of langdurig in kindertehuizen zullen worden ondergebracht.

Reden voor Meiling om wel in gesprek te blijven met de betrokkenen in Suriname en hen, iets wat wij tijdens onze reis ook gedaan hebben, duidelijk te maken dat adoptie voor kinderen, bijv. special needs kinderen, die moeilijker plaatsbaar zijn in een gezin wel een goede optie is.

Dat wij Nederland gezinnen/ouders hebben die een kindje met een dergelijk rapport goed kunnen en willen opvangen.

Ook nu wij terug in Nederland zijn, zijn we daar nog steeds mee bezig.

Mw. Bughwandass van Bureau Familierechtelijke zaken geeft ook duidelijk aan dat het absoluut niet de bedoeling is dat het Surinamekanaal gaat sluiten.

Alleen is het niet meer mogelijk om aan te geven om hoeveel kinderen het ongeveer per jaar zal gaan. Dat maakt het dus moeilijk. Voor ons als medewerkers van Meiling, maar ook zeker voor alle wachtende ouders. Er is veel meer onzekerheid gekomen over de toekomst en de wachttijden.

Daarom houden wij intensief contact met Suriname om daar waar mogelijk duidelijkheid te creëren en ieder kindje wat voor adoptie in aanmerking komt nog steeds een goed thuis te bieden.
 
Illegale adoptie

Ook tijdens ons verblijf in Suriname werden we geconfronteerd met zaken waarin illegale adoptie een rol speelt. Hoe jammer om dat te horen. Het draagt absoluut niet bij aan een goed beeld van adoptie en aan de bereidheid van Suriname om mee te werken aan adoptieprocedures. Door deze illegale adopties wordt het alleen maar moeilijker voor adoptiefouders die wel de legale weg behandelen om een kindje te adopteren. En daarmee zijn niet alleen deze ouders gedupeerd, maar ook beslist alle kinderen die daardoor in een gezin op zouden kunnen groeien.

We hebben ook aan alle betrokkenen duidelijk aangegeven dat het voor Meiling absoluut onbespreekbaar is en dat wij, dat wat in ons vermogen ligt, zullen doen om illegale adoptie tegen te gaan.
 
Follow-uprapportages

Voor dat wij vertrokken hebben we alle ouders met een kind uit Suriname geprobeerd te bereiken om ook dit jaar weer hun follow-uprapportage te maken en aan ons toe te sturen. Gelukkig gingen we met een hele dikke map naar Suriname. Maar hij had nog veel dikker kunnen zijn. Want niet alle ouders geven een reactie terug in de vorm van de follow-uprapportage of een boodschap hoe zij met hun follow-uprapportage om gaan.

Misschien wel omdat zij verhuisd zijn en hun nieuwe adres niet bij Meiling hebben achter gelaten. De rapportages waren erg welkom, zowel bij Bureau Familierechtelijke zaken en het ministerie van Justitie in Suriname.

Op deze manier hebben wij de instanties laten zien dat wij ook hen op de hoogte willen houden van de ontwikkelingen van het uit Suriname geadopteerde kind.

Wat niet wil zeggen dat alle rapportages gelezen zijn, maar de foto’s van de kinderen maken al heel veel duidelijk.

Tijdens ons verblijf werd al twee keer door biologische ouders of familieleden gevraagd of er nieuwe foto’s waren van de kinderen of misschien zelfs wel een tekening. Een familie konden we blij maken, de anderen helaas niet. Van hen is er al langere tijd geen rapportage meer opgestuurd, terwijl de familie wel blijft vragen hierom. Zo jammer…..

Op Bureau Familierechtelijke zaken werd verteld dat de familie/ouders van het kind de foto’s mee mogen nemen. Er blijft slechts een foto achter bij Bureau Familierechtelijke Zaken voor het dossier. Mw. Bughwandass vertelde hoe blij ze daar mee zijn, maar dat familie/ouders vaak nog blijer zijn als er ook nog een tekening bij is die speciaal voor hen gemaakt is.

Opnieuw is de grote waarde van de follow-uprapportages gebleken. Ook op deze plaats dank aan alle ouders die een rapportage hebben opgestuurd of op een andere wijze rapporteren aan Bureau Familierechtelijke Zaken hoe het gaat met het door hen geadopteerde kind.
 
Jubileum Samuël

Naast het bezoek aan de instellingen hebben wij in Suriname het jubileum mee mogen vieren met kinderhuis Samuël. Zij bestaan inmiddels veertig jaar.

Het vieren van het Jubileum werd begonnen met een kerkdienst. In deze dienst werd door alle kinderen een bijdrage geleverd. Van een lied met tamboerijnen tot een mooie dans. De kinderen waren allemaal heel mooi gekleed. Zij hadden alle de traditionele kleding aan, behorend bij hun afkomst. Heel bijzonder om te zien en mee te maken.

Tijdens de dienst werd er ook een bijdrage geleverd door zowel het Nederlandse als Surinaams bestuur van het kinderhuis, als ook door de (oud)medewerkers.

De dienst straalde veel dankbaarheid en blijdschap uit.

Daarna zijn we meegegaan om samen met andere genodigden te eten in Samuël zelf. 
Naast dat het gezellig was om met elkaar te eten, is het goed om te zien dat het huis zich in redelijk goede omstandigheden bevindt. En steeds verder opgeknapt wordt door Dirk-Jan.

Helaas begon het heel hard te regenen op dat moment, maar ook daar valt wel een mouw aan aan te passen. De kinderen lieten zich niet uit het veld slaan door de regen.

Speciaal voor de gelegenheid stond er een grote trampoline en springkussen. Het springkussen zakte in door de regen. Maar springen op de trampoline kan wel….. Totdat ook de trampoline te glad wordt.

Ter gelegenheid van het jubileum heeft Meiling een grote glijbaan gegeven, waar ook al veel gebruik van werd gemaakt door de kinderen.

Daarnaast hebben we ook voor alle kinderen een cadeautje meegenomen. De koffer was flink vol toen we vertrokken en bijna leeg toen we naar huis gingen.

’s Avonds was er nog een receptie ter gelegenheid van het jubileum waar ook wij naar toe gegaan zijn.

Het was een hele vrolijke dag, ondanks de grote regenbuien.
  
Bezoek kinderhuizen

Tijdens ons verblijf hebben we ook nog een (kort) bezoek gebracht aan drie andere kinderhuizen. NL. het Lotjeshuis, Bethel en de Mariahoeve.

Het Lotjeshuis zit nu nog in een oude behuizing, gelukkig wordt er inmiddels nieuw gebouwd voor de kinderen. Het is nu erg donker en somber.

De Mariahoeve is het huis van Nesta en John. Zij vingen in het verleden al kinderen op voor o.a.. Meiling, maar bieden ook andere kinderen een warm plekje om te wonen. Zij hebben er voor gekozen om het aantal kinderen uit te breiden en hebben daarvoor hun huis verbouwd. Er is niet alleen ruimte gekomen voor meer kinderen, maar zij hebben ook ruimte gemaakt voor de biologische moeders van de kinderen. Zodat zij hen ook voor korte periodes kunnen opvangen of zij langs kunnen komen om hun kinderen te bezoeken.

Zij hebben hun huis daarom ook een naam gegeven. Op 27 april, helaas net voor onze aankomst in Suriname, is het huis ingezegend door een priester en heef t het de naam Mariahoeve gekregen.

En dan zijn we ook nog naar Bethel geweest. Bethel ligt een eind buiten de stad Paramaribo. Een bijzonder huis waar ook voor oudere kinderen een mogelijkheid is om opgevangen te worden. Ook daar troffen we mensen aan met een groot en liefdevol hart voor de kinderen waar zij voor zorgen.

Zowel Marlies als ik (Elza) waren nog niet eerder in Suriname geweest. Wat is het goed om alles te mogen zien en mensen te mogen spreken. Dan weet je ook waar je het als voorzitter of landencontactpersoon over hebt en over wie je het hebt.

Het was een waardevol bezoek, ook al hadden we graag andere berichten mee terug gebracht voor alle wachtende ouders.
 
Regentijd

Tijdens ons bezoek aan Suriname was het al regentijd. Ook wij hebben tijdens ons verblijf regelmatig een flinke bui regen gehad. Een ochtend heeft het uren achter elkaar geregend. Volgens onze taxichauffeur kon ieder moment de straat onder water lopen, komend vanuit de rivier die door Paramaribo stroomt. Dat viel gelukkig allemaal mee. En het werd weer droog en door de zon en de warmte verdampte heel veel water ook weer.

Pas toen we weer terug waren kwam het bericht van de rampzalige gevolgen van de overstromingen in een groot gebied van de binnenlanden van Suriname. Daar heeft de regen duidelijk meer gevolgen gehad dan voor ons en de inwoners van Paramaribo.

Zoals al eerder op de site te lezen zal Meiling in de tijd van de wederopbouw onderzoeken welke mogelijkheden om vanuit projecthulp een bijdrage daar aan te leveren.
 
Digitale camera

Tot slot nog een klein moment van plezier wat ik heb mogen delen met de kinderen uit Samuël. Want een digitale camera kennen ze niet. En hé, je ziet jezelf direct terug op het schermpje van het toestel. Een reden voor veel plezier en een heel aantal foto’s van een lachende kinderen.
 
Al met al een heel mooi bezoek aan Suriname, waar er hopelijk nog veel van volgen.
 
Elza van Vliet

Landencontactersoon Suriname

Romania: la testimonianza di Azota Popescu

Romania: la testimonianza di Azota Popescu.

PUBBLICATO IN NEWS

Di seguito riportiamo la lettera di Azota Popescu, Rappresentante della Associazione Il Conventino per le adozioni internazionali in Romania. E' una lettera che sprizza felicità e gioia da tutti i pori. Ci auguriamo che presto la situazione delle adozioni possa risolversi favorevolmente.

Buon giorno, carissimi Angeli protettori!
Vi ringrazio per la fiducia in me, in Catharsis !!! Vi ringrazio per l'aiuto !!!!Con i 3200euro, ricevuti da Voi, piu 1000 dollari ricevuti da Stati Uniti e più la mia pensione di 400 euro al mese, abbiamo girato il mondo ....
d'appertutto , per informare la gente, per cambiare la mentalita, per aiutare l'infanzia rumena condanata a una vita senza l'amore, senza la luce, senza futuro......Ecco, finalmente, sono arrivata alla fine della campagna- maratons di raccogliere le 100.000 firme per l'appertura delle adozioni internazionali in Romania. una vera ''aventura''. Per favore, scusate, per il mio silenzio. Sono stata impegnatissima, ho visuto un esperienza inimaginabile, conoscere l'oppinione della gente di strada, la credibilita di me e di Catharsis, l'aiuto della comunita (medici, insegnanti, assistenti maternali, le coppie che hanno adotatto e anche quelli che aspetano adottare, i studenti delle varie facolta, i turisti, i giornalisti, le partite .......Vorrei ringraziare a Voi,per il sostegno morale e finanziario, vorrei ringraziare al Signore per iluminarmi, per la forza fizica e morale di andare avanti, durante tre mesi , quasi, insuportabili....ascoltando in ogni giorno gli stessi commenti teribilli sul trafico di organi, la vendita dei bambini per prostituire, ....ma, anche belle parole di incoraggiare per continuare raccogliere delle firme on line, e di piu, sulla strada....Alla metta di agosto, doppo aver raccoglto oltre 70.000 firme,ero, quasi disperata.
Il Signore mi ha iluminato , di andare a Bucharest, per cercare - incontrare il Presidente della Comissione per Diritti del Uomo, della Camera dei Deputati del Parlamento rumeno, il 17 agosto. Lui e' ramasto impressionato del Progetto - -Petizione di Catharsis.....e mi ha incoraggiato moltissimo : ,, complimenti, signora, per tutto che stai facendo per i bambini- orfani rumeni ! Basta, non dovete piu raccogliere le firme, io prenderro il vostro progetto e preparerro l' iniziativa legislativa per riappertura delle adozioni internazionali in Romania".
Ci vediamo il 01 settebre nella Camera dei Deputati, con tutte le firme, il progetto, la petizione, tutto, tutto sui motivi per promuovere la vostra iniziativa.Ieri, 01 settebre, una delegazione Catharsis-9 persone( 2 ragazzi , 30 e 22 anni, in dificolta doppo l'uscita dal orfanotrofio, 2 assistenti maternali, io, la giurista e l'assistente sociale da Catharsis, un volontario e la Mirabella, ragazza di 24 anni, adotatta in Italia, 10 anni fa, oggi, felicissima di avere , insieme la sua sorellina -15 anni, la loro famiglia, due medici italiani, abbiamo parlato piu di tre ore meso, abbiamo motivato tutto con prove( fotografie), abbiamo lasciato tutte le firme (85.000),e dobbiamo ritornare, tra due- tre settimane, per presentare davanti ai 10 deputati membri della Comisione per Diritti del Uomo, anche altre prove sulle adozioni, grandi successi. in UE.... (...)Spero , che, la Grazia Divina, mi aiutera per vincere questa teribille battaglia!!!
Ciao, a tutti e, un abbraccio affetuoso, Azota

Couples sue adoption agency for "bait, switch" scheme

Couples sue adoption agency for "bait, switch" scheme

PHILADELPHIA | Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:05pm EDT

(Reuters) - Five couples claim an international adoption agency that promised each a baby from Guatemala scammed them in a "bait and switch" scheme and are suing under a federal law more often used against mobsters and drug dealers.

The lawsuit against Main Street Adoption Services, based in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, was filed under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) statute.

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of five couples from Illinois, Minnesota and Louisiana, accuses the agency and three individuals of conspiring with one another "for the illegal purpose of committing fraudulent adoptions through a bait and switch scheme, an adoption scheme that offered illusory promises."

The prospective parents in 2007-2008 spent up to $25,000 each for adoptions that have not yet been completed, and may never be, the lawsuit said. The couples suffered humiliation, outrage, indignation, sleepless nights, and severe emotional distress, court documents said.

Neither the defendants nor their lawyer could be reached for comment on Wednesday. A lawyer for the couples declined comment.

In each case, the promise was that a young child was awaiting the couple in Guatemala. But in each case, things went wrong, even after the couples had traveled to Guatemala to meet the children.

In one such case, in 2007, a couple was assured that they would be meeting their new daughter, Madeline, at a hotel in Guatemala. By that point, they had paid $12,500.

Nobody showed up at the hotel with the child, and they received a call from the agency saying the birth mother had reclaimed Madeline 11 days before they arrived in Guatemala, the lawsuit said. They were "heartbroken, devastated and appalled," according to court papers.

The couple then quickly fell in love with a second child, the suit claimed. But eventually, that adoption also fell through. By then the couple had paid over $25,000.

The suit demands the adoption agency pay each couple triple the amount of their losses as well as cover court costs and damages of more than $75,000.

(Editing by Barbara Goldberg and Peter Bohan)

Opri?i exportul de copii!

Opri?i exportul de copii!

Senatul voteaz? mâine reluarea adop?iilor interna?ionale, deghizate în "adop?ii interne"
13 iunie 2011 – 13:01
 Foto: Karina Knapek / Jurnalul Na?ional 
ESENTIALCite?te avizul GuvernuluiCite?te Proiectul de Lege 250 pe 2011Cite?te raportul final al comisiilor

Ce-ar mai fi de vândut în România? P?durile le-am rezolvat, mun?ii îi întâlnim prin declara?iile de avere ale unora, terenurile agricole sunt cump?rate de str?inii ce-?i descoper? la noi pasiunea pentru agricultur?, fabricile ?i uzinele sunt mormane de fier vechi înghesuite în containerele din port, aurul e pe duc?, combinatele sunt date. Ce-a mai r?mas de vândut în România? O marf? dup? care str?inii tânjesc de ani de zile. Comercializat? en-detail, i-a îmbog??it în anii '90 pe negustorii pricepu?i. ONG-uri ?i case de avocatur?. Din ce s-ar mai putea face azi bani în România? Din copiii abandona?i. Guri de hr?nit, salarii de pl?tit asisten?ilor sociali ?i maternali, pagub?-n buget. Suflete-n plus pe harta României care e preg?tit? s?-?i exporte iar copiii.

"În sistemul de protec?ie social? din România sunt, în momentul de fa??, circa 67 000 – 70 000 de copii. Dintre ace?tia, circa 23 000 de copii sunt în centre de plasament, circa 21 000 de copii sunt în asisten?? maternal?, restul copiilor sunt în alte forme de plasament. (...) În momentul de fa?? ?i, de fapt, în ultimii cinci ani, num?rul de familii de români care vor s? adopte copii excede num?rului de copii adoptabili. Dac? num?rul de copii adoptabili este, undeva, la o medie de 1 100 – 1 200 de copii, num?rul de familii care doresc s? adopte copii, familii de români, este de circa 1 600 – 1 700 ?i, de foarte multe ori, aceste familii renun?? din cauza birocra?iei sau din cauza altor motive, dar interesul în România pentru adop?ia na?ional? este un interes major, care ne deosebe?te fa?? de alte state din Europa.” A?a î?i promova în plenul Senatului proiectul legislativ de modificare a Legii 273/2004 Bogdan Panait, secretar de stat la Oficiul Român pentru Adop?ii (ORA). În realitate, e o campanie de marketing, bine coordonat?, cu reportaje lacrimogene la televizor ?i imagini cu stadioane pline de copii ai nim?nui. Scopul proiectului legislativ e unul singur: reluarea adop?iilor interna?ionale! Cet???nii români sunt discrimina?i de lege, iar prevederile Constitu?iei sunt nesocotite, lucru care, într-adev?r, "ne deosebe?te fa?? de alte state din Europa”...

Protectul legislativ 250/2011 opereaz? 70 de modific?ri în legea privind regimul juridic al adop?iilor. Una singur? a fost scoas? la înaintare, în public: reducerea perioadei în care un copil poate fi declarat adoptabil (30 de zile de la eliberarea certificatului de na?tere în situa?ia copilului cu p?rin?i necunoscu?i – abandona?ii din maternit??i -, sau 1 an de la luarea m?surii de protec?ie în cazul copiilor care au p?rin?i, dar ace?tia sunt dezinteresa?i de ei). Familiile de români care vor s? înfieze s-ar putea declara fericite. Gre?it! De acum înainte, conform legii, vor concura pentru un copil adoptabil cot la cot cu cet??enii str?ni, la aceea?i categorie: "adop?ie intern?”. ?i asta în vreme ce cona?ionalii no?tri afla?i la munc? în str?in?tate vor aplica, dac? vor s? înfieze copii din România, la categoria "adop?ii interna?ionale”.

Ce nu s-a spus pân? acum despre PL 250/2011 este c? el modific? no?iunea de "adop?ie intern?”. Legea veche, înc? în vigoare, prevede c? adop?ia intern? e cea în care atât adoptatorul cât ?i adoptatul au domiciliul stabil în România. Legea nou?, care va fi votat? mâine de Senat, spune c? "adop?ia intern?” este cea "în care atât adoptatorul sau familia adoptatoare, cât ?i adoptatul au re?edin?? obi?nuit? în România”. Ce înseamn? "re?edin?? obi?nuit?”? PL 250/2011 introduce în lege un nou articol – art.3, ind (1) – cu urm?torul cuprins: "în sensul prezentei legi, prin re?edin?? obi?nuit? în România a adoptatorului/ familiei adoptatoare se în?elege situa?ia: a) cet??enilor români cu domiciliu în România (...)” dar ?i, aten?ie! "b) cet??enilor statelor membre UE/SEE sau str?inilor care au drept de reziden?? permanent? sau dup? caz, drept de ?edere permanent? pe teritoriul României”.