Home  

DECOMBRET--ADOPTION LAW IN ROMANIA DOESN'T RESPECT INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS

ADOPTION LAW IN ROMANIA DOESN'T RESPECT INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS

Article from Mediafax Nov. 10, 2006

DECOMBRET--ADOPTION LAW IN ROMANIA DOESN'T RESPECT INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS

Brussels, Nov. 10, 2006

"The law from 2004 regarding adoptions in Romania includes an article which is against the United Nations Convention and the Hague Convention, because it forbids international adoptions," declared the president of the foundation SERA France, Francois DeCombret, in an attempt to force Romanian authorities to review the legislation in this area.

The case of children who left for treatment and did not return to the country

The case of children who left for treatment and did not return to the country

child

Several children left Romania for treatment abroad

The National Authority for Child Protection will check under what conditions they left Romania, for several years, based on medical certificates recommending treatment abroad. The cases were reported by the newspaper "Gândul".

It would be about children who left the country for treatment through humanitarian organizations, one of them being SERA (Solidarite Enfants Roumains Abandonnes).

Adoptions International, Inc.: Violation report November 2006

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 22007b
Standard Description:   Personnel File -Documentation that Person meets Requirements
Technical Assistance Given:   Yes
 
Narrative
One staff record evaluated did not indicate how the staff met Level I qualifications regarding experience.

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 13312
Standard Description:   Submit an Annual Financial Report
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
The agency was to submit their annual financial report by 3/1/2006.

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 745.4061(10)
Standard Description:   Pre-Adoptive Home Screening - Information must include the prospective adoptive parents' attitude about the adoptive child's religion, if applicable
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
One of the two records evaluated did not mention religion of the adoptive child or adoptive parent's attitude regarding religion.
 

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 745.4061(18)
Standard Description:   Pre-Adoptive Home Screening-include results of criminal history and central registry background checks conducted on prospective adoptive parents
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
One of the two records evaluated was missing documentation of the central registry background check. It was noted that it had been done, but the required documentation was not available.

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 745.4061(20)
Standard Description:   Pre-Adoptive Home Screening-includes telephone numbers given to prospective adoptive parents for filing complaints about how screening was conducted
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
The two records evaluated lacked a phone number for filing complaints regarding the screening.

One billion dollars from export of children

One billion dollars from export of children (Social)
         The old system of international adoption, practiced until 2004, has put more than one billion euros in the pockets of those who have left children intermediate Romanian foreign countries.

Nearly 30,000 Romanian children were adopted internationally from 1990 until the end of 2004, when he entered into force new legislation concerning the legal status of adoptions, which put a "exports" of children. The figure, reported by Theodora Bertzi, head of the Romanian Office for Adoptions (ORA), was first circulating in sociologist Alin Teodorescu, based on a study in 2003. "If from 1997 until 2002, after introducing moratorium, were acts of international adoption for 10,000 children, the figure of 30,000 does not seem exaggerated for the period 1990-2004," said Bertzi.

30,000 dollars for a child

In addition, says chief ORA NGOs were funded by Romanian families from outside in order to receive children for international adoption, money which should have been invested in programs in Romania. Besides these sums, families dadeau foreign NGOs, local partners of the amounts between 30,000 and 50,000 euros, to adopt a Romanian child, said Bertzi. A simple calculation shows that the Romanian children was paid in these years at least one billion euros.

Diana Nistorescu, executive director of the Federation of NGOs Active in Child Protection (FONPC), said that NGOs had this money from outside "is allowed to pay taxes from the Child Protection which had priority in obtaining permits, are favored .

She added that "the old system was corrupt, from the highest level until the last maternity leave, but nobody was punished." Bogdan Panait, president of the Authority for Child Protection (ANPDC) says that "most of the amounts taken to remain in Romanian children abroad, including where they were used in election campaigns of politicians who claimed international adoptions.

Take the signature

Secretary of State ORA explain the large number of children who went to a foreign family in very simple ways of making adoptions, but also by the existence of trafficking networks. "Before 1997, adoption is made in the village hall. Venea mother who sign that they put the baby up for adoption, then sign and making adoptatoare family in receipt. The transaction is easy, and had a child stuff," according Theodora Bertzi. The trafficking of children, both reported by the European Community, as well as representatives of NGOs, and those who deal with child protection, are now in a process of "sleepy", pending unlocking international adoptions, added the representative TIME.

Nepotism between NGOs and state

Before the moratorium established in 2001, which provisional closing valve adoptiior international law Roman "made clear the connection between children and money, which led to the corruption," said Bertzi. She claims that were several methods used for trafficking in children, a clear violation of international law and signed by Romania.

One of these was the creation of an internal network based on nepotism, between representatives of state institutions who were in care of children and NGOs allowed to do international adoptions. "I know chiefs who were at the Office of Adoptions, whose daughter was a lawyer and worked at a firm adoption. So here is how to circulate information. Or a head swing, or was swinging, whose daughter had a foundation in connection with another foundation outside, all the lawyer girl. She clearly knew where the children are families who came and I brought there. When you have families who wanted a child, this was done immediately adopted. These were not in law incompatibilities, but they exist. For that could never be punished, "tells Bertzi.

Mothers, and fooled by the state attorneys

Another method of obtaining a child has been systematic pacalirea mothers, especially after 1997. On the one hand, lawyers NGOs interested persuade mothers, usually poor, as the child is better to be raised several years of rich families from abroad. Finally, the mother signed a notarized document that was agreed to give her children from their families abroad, but without knowing the final despartirea was said Bertzi.

In parallel, the social workers tried to separate the child from the mother and the staff placed the cradle where the baby was not recorded in the register of visiting relatives or mother. So that, by law, if a child appeared in obvious that was not visited his family for more than six months, it became adopted. Before 1997, the network traffic was in the maternity and pediatric sections. "Who had the information? Medical personnel working there. Certainly there is a remuneration for the job. It's hard to prove, that any party would not have any interest to say that he / it or took money," says chief TIME.

Theodora Bertzi May shows that he began receiving complaints from mothers coming in the past, which now require to give kids back, but authorities can not do anything for them.

Valve was closed to traffic

Romanian authorities say that now, in Romania, there is the framework that allows such kind of trafficking in children. "There may be traffic now. There is a clear procedure is that the new law that binds the hands," said Theodora Bertzi. Opinion shared by Secretary of State Bogdan Panait: "The law had cut much of the impetus. We did not have signs that it would have such things happen, plus the corrupt foundations do not have authorization or have no activity object now. Diana Nistorescu from FONPC says: "It is very hard to believe that they steal children from maternity or that there is network traffic. Such information leak usually is about large sums of money."
==============================

Un miliard de dolari din exportul de copii (Social)
        Vechiul sistem de adoptie internationala, practicat pina in 2004, a bagat peste un miliard de euro in buzunarele celor care au intermediat plecarea copiilor romani in tari straine.

Aproape 30.000 de copii romani au fost adoptati international din 1990 pina la sfirsitul lui 2004, cind a intrat in vigoare noua legislatie privind regimul juridic al adoptiilor, care a pus punct "exporturilor" de copii. Cifra, semnalata de Theodora Bertzi, seful Oficiului Roman pentru Adoptii (ORA), a fost pentru prima data vehiculata de sociologul Alin Teodorescu, pe baza unui studiu din 2003. "Daca din 1997 pina in 2002, dupa instaurarea moratoriului, au fost facute acte de adoptie internationala pentru 10.000 de copii, cifra de 30.000 nu pare exagerata pentru perioada 1990-2004", a declarat Bertzi.

30.000 de dolari pentru un copil

In plus, spune seful ORA, ONG-urile romanesti erau finantate de familiile din afara ca sa poata primi copii spre adoptie internationala, bani care ar fi trebuit investiti in programe in Romania. Pe linga aceste sume, familiile dadeau ONG-urilor straine, partenere ale celor autohtone, sume cuprinse intre 30.000 si 50.000 de euro, pentru a adopta un copil roman, afirma Bertzi. Un simplu calcul arata ca pentru copiii romani s-a platit in acesti ani minimum un miliard de euro.

Diana Nistorescu, director executiv al Federatiei ONG-urilor Active in Protectia Copilului (FONPC), spune ca ONG-urile care aveau acesti bani din afara "isi permiteau sa plateasca taxe celor de la Protectia Copilului prin care aveau prioritate la obtinerea autorizatiilor, fiind favorizati".

Ea a adaugat ca "vechiul sistem a fost corupt, de la cel mai inalt nivel pina la ultima maternitate, insa nu a fost nimeni pedepsit". Bogdan Panait, presedintele Autoritatii pentru Protectia Copilului (ANPDC) spune ca "majoritatea sumelor luate pentru copiii romani ramineau in strainatate, unde erau folosite inclusiv in campaniile electorale ale politicienilor care sustineau adoptiile internationale".

Luati pe semnatura

Secretarul de stat ORA explica numarul mare de copii care au mers la o familie straina prin modalitatile foarte simple prin care se faceau adoptiile, dar si prin existenta retelelor de trafic. "Inainte de 1997, adoptia se facea la primaria de comuna. Venea mama copilului, care semna ca isi da copilul spre adoptie, apoi semna si familia adoptatoare de luare in primire. Tranzactia se facea usor, iar copilul ajunsese ca o marfa", potrivit Theodorei Bertzi. Sistemul de traficare a copiilor, semnalat atit de comunitatea europeana, cit si de reprezentantii ONG-urilor si ai celor care se ocupa de protectia copilului, se afla acum intr-un proces de "adormire", in asteptarea deblocarii adoptiilor internationale, a adaugat reprezentantul ORA.

Nepotism intre ONG-uri si stat

Inainte de moratoriul instaurat in 2001, prin care se inchidea provizoriu supapa adoptiior internationale, legislatia romana "facea clar legatura intre copii si bani, care au dus la coruperea sistemului", spune Bertzi. Ea sustine ca au fost mai multe metode folosite pentru traficul de copii, incalcari clare ale legislatiilor internationale semnate si de Romania.

Una dintre acestea a fost crearea unei retele interne, bazate pe nepotism, intre reprezentantii institutiilor statului care aveau in grija copiii si ONG-urile autorizate sa faca adoptii internationale. "Am aflat de sefi, care erau la Biroul de Adoptii, a caror fiica era avocat si lucra la o firma de adoptii. Deci iata cum circula informatia. Sau o directoare de leagan, sau fost leagan, a carei fata avea o fundatie, in legatura cu alta fundatie din afara, tot avocata fata. Ea stia clar unde, care sint copiii, familiile care veneau si ii aduceau acolo. In momentul in care aveau familii care doreau un copil, imediat acesta era facut adoptabil. Astea nu erau in lege incompatibilitati, dar ele existau. De asta nici nu puteau fi pedepsite", povesteste Bertzi.

Mamele, pacalite de stat si de avocati

O alta metoda de obtinere a unui copil roman a fost pacalirea sistematica a mamelor, in special dupa 1997. Pe de o parte, avocatii ONG-urilor interesate le convingeau pe mame, de obicei sarace, ca le e mai bine copiilor sa fie crescuti citiva ani de familii bogate din strainatate. In final, mamele semnau un act notarial prin care erau de acord sa-si dea copiii familiilor din strainatate, fara sa stie insa ca despartirea era definitiva, spune Bertzi.

Paralel, asistentii sociali incercau sa desparta copilul de mama, iar personalul leaganului unde era plasat copilul nu trecea in registru vizitele rudelor sau ale mamei. Astfel ca, potrivit legii, daca un copil aparea in evidente ca nu a fost vizitat de familia sa timp de mai mult de sase luni, el devenea adoptabil. Inainte de 1997, reteaua de trafic era in maternitati sau sectiile de pediatrie. "Cine avea informatiile? Personalul medical care lucra acolo. Categoric exista o remuneratie pentru treaba asta. E greu de dovedit, pentru ca nici una dintre parti nu ar avea vreun interes sa spuna ca a dat/da sau a luat bani", spune seful ORA.

Theodora Bertzi mai arata ca a inceput sa primeasca plingeri de la mamele pacalite in trecut, care cer acum sa li se dea copiii inapoi, dar autoritatile nu mai pot face nimic pentru acestea.

Supapa traficului a fost inchisa

Autoritatile romane sustin ca acum, in Romania, nu mai exista cadrul care sa permita un asemenea tip de trafic de copii. "Nu se mai poate face trafic acum. Exista o procedura clara, este legea asta noua care ii leaga de miini", spune Theodora Bertzi. Parere impartasita si de secretarul de stat Bogdan Panait: "Legea le-a taiat mult din elan. Noi nu am avut semne ca s-ar mai intimpla astfel de lucruri, plus ca fundatiile corupte nu mai au autorizatie sau nu mai au obiect de activitate acum". Diana Nistorescu de la FONPC spune: "Imi e foarte greu sa cred ca se fura copii din maternitati sau ca exista retele de trafic. Astfel de informatii transpira de obicei, fiind vorba despre sume mari de bani".


Sursa: Cotidianul

 

 

 

Who is Liviu Turcu?

Born on July 12, 1948, in Galati. Graduated from the Faculty of Sociology in Bucharest. Scientific researcher at the Institute of Studies and Research for Economic Forecasting and assistant at the University of Bucharest. Doctorate in philosophy, in 1977, at the same university. He collaborated in various newspapers and magazines.

In 1976, he was co-opted into the external intelligence service (DIE, later CIE) of the State Security Department, advancing to the rank of major. Initially, it was assigned to the Political-Economic Division, the service for North America (V 2).

He was promoted to head of office, then head of the operative service for the USA/Canada and head of the Western Europe service, the Germany, Austria, Switzerland space group.

He was involved in informative-operative activities in the political-economic field, under the diplomatic cover of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in the USA, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Denmark and in addition to UN international bodies.

In January 1989, while he was on a temporary mission in Vienna, under the guise of a counselor, he decided not to return to Romania and requested political asylum in the USA. He was the last major defector from the Bucharest spy service before the fall of Nicolae Ceausescu's communist dictatorship.

Experience the difference

Experience the difference

By Kristin Morency, The Suburban
 




Photo by Martin Chamberland, The Suburban

Chamandy: It’s important to promote the creativity of artists.

 



Gift store sells crafts from Africa, South America, Mexico and Canada.


 

It’s hard to imagine that shopping here at home could benefit destitute orphans on the other side of the world.

Vive la Différence, a small gift shop on Monkland Ave. in N.D.G., is a non-profit, volunteer-run store founded and operated by Beaconsfieldresident Tina Chamandy. 

Net profits are sent to Families for Children (FFC),  a non-profit Canadian organization providing support and care for women and children in two orphanages in India and Bangladesh.  

The store, which promotes fair trade and features unique crafts from artists around the world, has been open for about a year. 

Chamandy works alone, although sometimes her friends volunteer. 

On top of supporting FFC, Chamandy’s goal with Vive la Différence is to promote fair trade.

“I like to provide an alternative to the usual mass-produced items we find everywhere,” Chamandy said at her store last week.

“I’m a strong believer in fair trade. And I think it’s important to promote the creativity of artists all over the world and in Canada, and to enrich the lives of consumers and expose them to the diversity and beauty of the world.” 

Fine handcrafted glassware, original ceramics, purses, furniture and costume jewellery from Africa, South America, Mexico and Canada, can be found in Chamandy’s store.

Photos of some of the approximately 225 children from the two FFC orphanages hang on the store’s walls, and pamphlets about the orphans are available at the cash.

Chamandy, a mother of five who opened the store with her husband after they retired, has visited the children at the orphanage in Indiathree times.

“They’re extremely warm. They call you ‘Mommy’ and ‘Daddy,’” she said. “They’re always smiling and they were so excited to see us the first time we came. My heart melts for them.”

The orphanage in India spans a couple of town blocks and includes a small school, a library, and sleeping quarters. 

FFC receives children who are abandoned or referred to them by Indian social services. 

Occasionally, a family will bring their children to the orphanage if they’re too poor to look after them, but the kids will return home for holidays.

According to Chamandy, some of the orphans have physical disabilities or are infected with H.I.V.  

Nonetheless, many of the kids and women who are at the orphanages produce items, like cards and silk purses, to be sold in her store.

Above a shelf holding cards with intricate needlework, Chamandy points to a photograph of a visually impaired boy hard at work on one of the cards that will end up in her store. 

She said he didn’t want to wear glasses because he was afraid of how they made him look, so he had to hold the paper really close to his face to perfect his needlepoint.

“It shows that no matter how destitute or badly off they are, they’re still people,” Chamandy said.

Chamandy became involved with FFC when she was trying to adopt a child from Vietnam. (She ended up adopting a girl from Thailand who’s now 26 years-old.)

While going through the adoption process, she met Sandra Simpson, the founder of FFC.

“I’ve known Sandra a very long time and have been a supporter ever since,” said Chamandy.

Simpson, a native of Colombia who has homes in Pointe Claire and Toronto, said she adopted 24 children and has eight biological ones.

Along with her friends Bonnie Cappuccino and Naomi Bronstein, in 1968 Simpson founded FFC when she adopted a child from Vietnam. 

“Because of the publicity and requests from other people wanting to do the same, I founded FFC to help people adopt,” she said.

Since then, FFC has developed from an adoption agency to having in-country care centres in India and Bangladesh.

“I believe all of us are born for a reason, and that reason if possible should be to help another. I feel very fortunate in being part of an organization that helps so many,” Simpson said.

“Tina is doing an incredible job,” added Simpson. “She’s working so hard without any staff and she herself does not take pay. Being a small charity that gets very little publicity, awareness is very important to us.”

Vive la Différence is located at 5525 Monkland Ave. Hours are 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Tuesday to Friday, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday, and noon to 5 p.m. Sunday. 

2006-10-25 09:55:39

Couples angry at sex questions in adoption process

Couples angry at sex questions in adoption process


Sunday October 22 2006

NIAMH HORAN 
CONCERNS are being raised over the intrusive nature of some sexually explicit queries which are being put to Irish couples during the adoption process.

Couples who have been through the process have complained about being asked about their views on topics such as homosexuality and their sex life before they met their current partner.

Questions which have been asked include 'How do you feel about oral sex?' and 'How do you feel about gay people?'. Some people were even quizzed on their sex life before they met their partner while their spouse was present. This has sparked calls for a review of questions put to couples during the adoption process.

Debbie Deegan, founder of the charity 'To Russia With Love', has called for social workers to be more sensitive when dealing with prospective adoptive couples.

"Social workers need to be much more sensitive about the people they're dealing with. I know some couples have been complaining about the questions and resent some of the things they're being asked. I think one of the biggest hang-ups they have is being quizzed on their sex lives.

"I remember when I was going through the whole process about 10 years ago, I often wondered how relevant some of the questions were and I know my husband refused to answer some of them too.

"But I think in some cases social workers have their reasons. For example, if a couple didn't have any children, they might try and find out if there was a sexual reason behind that. In other words, they are trying to find a chink in the relationship that could impact on the adoption.

"But I would still call for a constant review of the questions that are being asked. It's not a perfect science and I know some of the couples aren't very comfortable with some of the questions being put to them," Ms Deegan said.

"You have to remember that they're also very nervous about getting the baby so they're probably going to give answers they think the social workers want to hear rather than genuine opinions."

However, Marie Creegan, a social worker who assess couples and who has adopted children herself, said that certain questions need to be asked because of the seriousness of the issue.

"It is intrusive and should be. We're talking about the life of a child here. We need to know if the parents are suitable. But I still think that most social workers would consider the feelings of the couple. All I'd want to know about their sex life when I'm conducting my assessments is whether or not they are mutually satisfied because, if not, then the trouble can go into other parts of their relationship," she said.

Creegan advised anyone who feels uncomfortable with the questions being asked to raise the issue with a member of the HSE. "I would say, if you have a problem with the social worker, then say it to them first and, if you still have a problem with the way the interview is being conducted, then go to the line manager."

However, Irish couples hoping to adopt children are facing waiting lists of up to four years because of the lack of children available for adoption. Those living in the Mid-West face a longer wait due to a lack of social workers in their area, while couples living in the East face the shortest waiting times.

Last year, 253 Irish children were adopted, with 191 being adopted by family members and 62 children being adopted outside the family.

In the same year, there were also 403 Irish couples approved for foreign adoptions, with the top three most popular countries of choice being Russia, Vietnam and China.

Deegan has also warned that couples wishing to adopt abroad face a long road before they can take a child home.

"It's a terrifying journey for most couples. First of all, countries like Vietnam and Russia can be very scary when you're visiting areas that are outside the main tourist spots. But it can also an emotional roller coaster. I've seen couples before who would have flown out to collect their child on a particular day, after bringing all the baby clothes with them, only to be told when they arrive that they'll have to come back another day because the court is closed or the judge is on holidays or something like that. So you'd definitely want to be a rock-solid couple going into it because it can be a very stressful situation. The highs and lows of the whole process can be very emotional."

Ms Deegan also said that couples have to be aware of the extra nurturing which adopted children need in the years afterwards.

"It's a big thing to take a child from their own culture and bring them into your home. The child often doesn't turn out to be the 'grateful' child you've expected them to be because the most natural attachment they had in the world [with their mother] has been broken, so they need a lot of nurturing. They will have an 'attachment wound' for a long time to come that needs constant healing," she said.

Minciuna "in interesul orfelinilor"

Minciuna "in interesul orfelinilor"

19 Oct 2006 Oana Craciun | 5 comentarii | 677 vizualizari

Rating:

7 voturi

Europarlamentarul Claire Gibault a dovedit ca nu a venit in Romania ca sa vada copiii de aici, ci ca sa prezinte la Bruxelles o imagine deformata de tara de orfani.

Comentariu: Europarlamentarul Claire Gibault s-a întâlnit pe furi? cu orfani din Bra?ov

Comentariu: Europarlamentarul Claire Gibault s-a întâlnit pe furi? cu orfani din Bra?ov

O sus?in?toare a adop?iilor interna?ionale, europarlamentarul Claire Gibault, împreun? cu al?i trei oficiali francezi, a avut, mar?i, o discu?ie neoficial? cu trei orfani din Bra?ov. Delega?ia francez? nu a dorit s? salute autorit??ile locale, astfel c? nici m?car Protec?ia Copilului nu ?tia de vizit?.

Cu ajutorul unui jurnalist local, europarlamentarul a stat de vorb? cu Alexandru ?i Bogdan – fra?ii binecunoscu?i pentru un alt scandal de la Poiana Soarelui, ?i cu Kalanyos Zsigmond, un orfan neinstitu?ionalizat. La apari?ia presei locale, orfanii au fost lua?i cu ma?inile ?i du?i la un local din Ghimbav (localitate de lâng? ora?ul Bra?ov), unde s-a discutat pân? la l?sarea serii.

Europarlamentarii au sosit în România luni, pl?nuind vizite în patru ora?e din România, printre care ?i Bra?ovul. Ei au ajuns la Colegiul Tehnic „Maria Baiulescu” (fostul MIU) din Bra?ov, unde înva?? cei doi fra?i, conform spuselor lor, între orele 15.00 – 16.00. „Au venit ?i am mers împreun? într-o sal? de la etaj. Erau patru francezi, nu ?tiu cum îi cheam?, împreun? cu Cornelius Popa, jurnalist din Bra?ov. Mai târziu a venit ?i directoarea cu ei, iar apoi, când au venit ?i al?i ziari?ti din Bra?ov, a început cearta. Bogdan nu a vrut s? vorbeasc? de fa?? cu presa. Francezii au în?eles acest lucru ?i ne-au luat cu ma?inile lor, pentru a merge într-un restaurant, pe undeva dup? Bartolomeu”, a spus Alexandru. Minorul spune c? au discutat despre adop?ii. „M-au întrebat ce a? face, cum a? tr?i, dac? a? fi fost acum în America”. Alexandru a precizat c? au fost lua?i de la ?coal? din timpul orelor. Bogdan – cel care a declan?at scandalul din Complex - nu mai putea s?-?i aminteasc? dac? restaurantul era din Ghimbav sau din Bartolomeu, „nici nu mai ?in minte”, probabil pentru c? au fost „stimula?i” s?-?i ?in? gura.

Bogdan a recunoscut îns? c? ?tia de ceva timp c? europarlamentarii îi vor vizita. „?tiam de vineri sau de sâmb?t?. Nu conteaz? cine mi-a spus. Oricum ?tiu când vor mai veni”, ne-a spus misterios minorul, „renumit” alt? dat? pentru detaliile cu care-?i povestea via?a la orfelinat. La ora la care au fost contacta?i, Alexandru ?i fratele s?u se întorceau de la ?coal?. „Ne-au ?inut cam pân? la ora 19.00. Ne-au adus la ?coal? unde ne a?tepta directoarea de la Complex ?i medicul (Liliana ?âmpea ?i Paul Dandu - n.r.). Ne-a certat pentru c? am plecat ?i ne-a întrebat ce am discutat. I-am spus c? fiecare î?i urm?re?te interesele, c? Poiana Soarelui a devenit o afacere. ?tiu c? m? vor a?tepta vremuri grele acolo”, a spus tân?rul.