Home  

List of agencies with missing Russian post placement reports

.

Adoptions International, Inc. (Texas): Violation report October 2007

This agency has two reports still pending.  One is a report and the other is a inspection. 

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 10/25/2007
Standard Number: 749.3623(12)(B)
Standard Description:   Pre-adoptive Home Screening-Obtain, document & assess willingness to provide child opportunity for religious and spiritual development
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
Neither of two home screenings addressed religion of adoptive families and related attitudes pertaining to the adoptive child.

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 10/25/2007
Standard Number: 749.3623(14)
Standard Description:   Pre-adoptive Home Screening-Obtain, document & assess sensitivity to, feelings about abused/neglected children if agency may place such children
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
Neither of two home screenings addressed adoptive parents sensitivity to children who may have been abused/neglected.
 
Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 10/25/2007
Standard Number: 749.3623(3)(A)
Standard Description:   Pre-adoptive Home Screening-Obtain, document & assess residence history: specific addresses & length of time at each for past 10 years
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
Neither of two home screenings documented the adoptive parents 'residence for prior ten years.

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 10/25/2007
Standard Number: 749.3627
Standard Description:   Pre-adoptive Home Screening-Document all interviews and attempts to complete interviews in adoptive home record
Technical Assistance Given:   Yes
 
Narrative
Documentation was not clear in either of two home screenings reviewed that all required interviews were completed.

Adoptions International, Inc.: Violation report November 2006

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 22007b
Standard Description:   Personnel File -Documentation that Person meets Requirements
Technical Assistance Given:   Yes
 
Narrative
One staff record evaluated did not indicate how the staff met Level I qualifications regarding experience.

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 13312
Standard Description:   Submit an Annual Financial Report
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
The agency was to submit their annual financial report by 3/1/2006.

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 745.4061(10)
Standard Description:   Pre-Adoptive Home Screening - Information must include the prospective adoptive parents' attitude about the adoptive child's religion, if applicable
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
One of the two records evaluated did not mention religion of the adoptive child or adoptive parent's attitude regarding religion.
 

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 745.4061(18)
Standard Description:   Pre-Adoptive Home Screening-include results of criminal history and central registry background checks conducted on prospective adoptive parents
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
One of the two records evaluated was missing documentation of the central registry background check. It was noted that it had been done, but the required documentation was not available.

Violation Details

Operation Number: 855248-163
Operation Name: Adoptions International, Inc.
Date: 11/1/2006
Standard Number: 745.4061(20)
Standard Description:   Pre-Adoptive Home Screening-includes telephone numbers given to prospective adoptive parents for filing complaints about how screening was conducted
Technical Assistance Given:   No
 
Narrative
The two records evaluated lacked a phone number for filing complaints regarding the screening.

Russian Embassy in U.S. requests documentation on death of Russian adoptee

Russian Embassy in U.S. requests documentation on death of Russian adoptee

 
14:32 | 09/ 07/ 2005
Print version

 

WASHINGTON, July 9 (RIA Novosti) - The Russian Embassy in the United States has requested documentation on the two year old adopted Russian girl who was killed by her foster mother.

"The Embassy requested the local police department and the adoption agency to provide the relevant documentation," spokesperson for the Embassy Yevgeny Khorishko said.

"The girl was taken into the American family through the Adoption International Inc agency in late January 2004," he added.

According to the spokesman, the girl held Russian citizenship and was registered in the Russian Embassy in the U.S.

Washington Post reported Friday that 33 year old Peggy Sue Hilt of North Carolina was charged with murder of her foster daughter Nina, whom she had adopted in Russia.

The woman confessed that she had battered her daughter, who infuriated her. Nina died from blows in hospital.

A spokesperson for Adoptions International Inc said over the phone that the agency had not yet received any request from the Russian Embassy.

"The company was shocked by the girl's murder, putting it mildly," she said.

Adoptions International Inc has specialized in assisting families to adopt children from Russia and the CIS countries, China and Guatemala since 1995. According to information on the agency's website, adoption costs from $10,000 to $18,000 depending on the child's citizenship.

Peggy Sue Hilt surrendered to the police last Wednesday and is held in a detention center with no possibility of bail, CBS reported.

Investigators were reported to have claimed they pursued the child maltreatment lead, but also admitted the possibility of sexual abuse.

Peggy Sue Hilt's husband, Christopher, is being questioned, while their senior child is under supervision.

 
14:32 | 09/ 07/ 2005
Print version

 

WASHINGTON, July 9 (RIA Novosti) - The Russian Embassy in the United States has requested documentation on the two year old adopted Russian girl who was killed by her foster mother.

"The Embassy requested the local police department and the adoption agency to provide the relevant documentation," spokesperson for the Embassy Yevgeny Khorishko said.

"The girl was taken into the American family through the Adoption International Inc agency in late January 2004," he added.

According to the spokesman, the girl held Russian citizenship and was registered in the Russian Embassy in the U.S.

Washington Post reported Friday that 33 year old Peggy Sue Hilt of North Carolina was charged with murder of her foster daughter Nina, whom she had adopted in Russia.

The woman confessed that she had battered her daughter, who infuriated her. Nina died from blows in hospital.

A spokesperson for Adoptions International Inc said over the phone that the agency had not yet received any request from the Russian Embassy.

"The company was shocked by the girl's murder, putting it mildly," she said.

Adoptions International Inc has specialized in assisting families to adopt children from Russia and the CIS countries, China and Guatemala since 1995. According to information on the agency's website, adoption costs from $10,000 to $18,000 depending on the child's citizenship.

Peggy Sue Hilt surrendered to the police last Wednesday and is held in a detention center with no possibility of bail, CBS reported.

Investigators were reported to have claimed they pursued the child maltreatment lead, but also admitted the possibility of sexual abuse.

Peggy Sue Hilt's husband, Christopher, is being questioned, while their senior child is under supervision.

Adoption: Solution or Problem?

To search

" Advanced search

Main menu

Home What you need to know Recent additions News Information desk .Transit/Homes .Photo archive Homes Publications Address book Library Calendar Web Links Reading table Out and about Forms Tracker's board Forum board Mailing list Guestbook Our Sponsors

Donate

Every bit helps...
Support the Adoption Meeting Point by making a telephone donation of 1.30 Euro!

Donate
Or transfer your donation to:
Bank account: 3021.94.754
Attn: Adoption Meeting Point
Neighborhood near Duurstede.

Who's Online

There are 5 user(s) online (There are 2 user(s) on Publications )
» Members: 0
» Guests: 5
more...


Publications > Year 2009 > Adoption: Solution or Problem?

Adoption: Solution or Problem?

Posted by Administrator2 on 10/10/2009 (104 reads)

Eindhovens Dagblad - October 10, 2009 - Peter van Vlerken.

Marcia Engel and Luís Carlos Vogels, two now somewhat older adopted children from Colombia, have started an initiative that aims to put an end to all kinds of abuses surrounding adoption. Their personal histories can serve to illustrate their position that adoption often does not mean a social solution, but rather creates a problem.

Roughly speaking, this is the still prevailing image of international adoption in the Netherlands: an unwanted childless couple takes a child from miserable circumstances in a third world country, so that everyone benefits. If it were not such a fashionable, commercially rotten expression, one could speak of a 'win-win situation'.
But according to Marcia Engel and Luís Carlos Vogels, that is a completely outdated romantic ideal. Having a child, whether adopted or not, is almost by definition a selfish act, and for a third world child, growing up in our country is more often than not not the best thing.
Which is not to say that there are no happy adoptive parents and happy adopted children. Fortunately, there are. But to illustrate the opposite, Luís quotes a statement from an African boy he met: adoption is a choice between dying of hunger or dying of sadness.
And Marcia sees it as a form of life imprisonment. “You are and remain an adoptee.
In the best case, you learn to deal with it so that it doesn't affect your social life and your future.” However, she knows from her own experience how difficult that is, and Luís can also talk about that, as is evident from their life stories described below.

The expectations of many adoptive parents are too rosy.
Parenting difficulties often lead to divorce, which means the child ends up on the streets – for a second time. The fear of attachment and abandonment, which is already very great among adopted children, is further fueled by this. Many end up with agencies such as Youth Care that cannot offer them the specific help they need. Suicide occurs relatively often.
These are – in a nutshell – the problems they describe. If Marcia and Luís have not experienced them themselves, they have learned them from fellow sufferers. For them, it was the reason for founding Plan Angel. The most important components of this initiative for the time being are an international registration system for the reunification of adopted children – some 35,000 in the Netherlands – with their biological parents abroad, and the equally large-scale collection of adoption files.

Not that they are against adoption on principle. But the best interests of the child should always come first.
According to them, this can only happen in a relationship with the adoptive parents and the biological parents. "Only when all parties in that triangle receive the recognition and respect they deserve, can you speak of a good adoption," says Marcia.
Luís cites human rights to support the argument that international adoption should eventually be abolished. “Children benefit most from remaining in their original environment. The best thing would be if prosperity and social provisions in the world were equalized.” That will take time, Marcia realizes. He: “That’s true, but it is my ideal.” She: “Adoption should be the last resort.” He: “But it is often seen as the first option.”
Luís believes that adoption is not a social solution, but a social problem. He speaks of a legal form of child trafficking, and Marcia agrees with him in that statement, although she prefers to speak of a 'disguised' form of child trafficking.
In any case, there are many in Western and corrupt Asian, African or Latin American countries who profit from adoption. Marcia, who wants to tackle the problem at the source with her foundation, knows that in her country of origin a Colombian couple can adopt a Colombian child for 2000 dollars, while it costs a foreign couple more than 20,000 dollars.
There are also recent examples from Chad and Cambodia that show that money is often a driving factor in adoption.
“It's just a market,” says Marcia.
“Because the demand for adopted children is greater than the supply, not only is the price being driven up, but attempts are also being made in all kinds of ways to increase the supply.”
Luís: “Sometimes it seems like child factories are created, where bonuses are paid out to bring in adopted children.” Marcia: “Mothers are pressured to give up their children, directors of orphanages are prepared – for a fee of course – to arrange the required papers.”

Luís is the one who deals with the adoption files. "They are almost never correct. Children are, as it were, laundered for adoption, while it is a fundamental right that the papers on the origin and the biological parents of a child are in order."
He is not alone in this view. The files are also a source of concern for Wereldkinderen, by far the largest mediation association in the Netherlands. For example, last month they stopped the adoption from Ethiopia after it became apparent that the files largely did not correspond to reality.
The start that Luís has made in creating a worldwide, digitalized network of adoption files is modest. "But if I can prove that a thousand files are incorrect, the Dutch justice system and the European Court of Justice will have no choice but to combat adoption with forged papers."
In response to Marcia and Luís' initiative, Wereldkinderen states that it is also against adoption based on incorrect files. According to spokesperson Martien Miedema, the internet does indeed offer new opportunities to reunite children and biological parents, but she would like to see this take place under proper supervision, for example by Wereldkinderen.
Wereldkinderen says it is always open to contact with adopted children and Luís does not rule out cooperation with these and other organizations such as Unicef and Amnesty.
Marcia, who also has plans for educational projects in countries of origin and a special emergency shelter for adopted children in the Netherlands, does not do that either. They both realize that their ambitions are big. Too big perhaps? "If we take it step by step, we can handle it."
See also www.adoptionangelsnetwork.com and www.adoptionfilesnetwork.com
They only started this year and their project is still in its infancy, but their ambition is great: a worldwide network must put an end to abuses surrounding international adoption. Two – now somewhat older – adopted children talk about their initiative.

“As a Brabander, an outsider”
Luís Carlos Vogels (25): “You can hear from my accent that I grew up in Brabant. However, as a Brabander I am an outsider, and I don’t mean so much in terms of skin colour. I was born in Colombia. When I was three, I was adopted together with my sister. My history as an adoptee is turbulent. I was not always treated well by my adoptive parents, and that is putting it mildly. Brabanders say things in a veiled way, I was very direct. That led to arguments, in which I had to endure a lot. I was not what my parents thought I should be: like them. They were reserved, I was temperamental. When I was eight, I went to youth care. Until I was sixteen, I went to see agencies, later I went to live with my uncle and aunt. At school I was seen as an odd little guy who liked to be in the spotlight. A macho. It was only after I returned to Colombia that I learned to understand my own behaviour. Colombia is one big macho culture.
In the Netherlands I had problems with my friendly interactions with women. Latinos simply hug more than Dutch people. My girlfriend – a 100% Dutch woman with blond hair and blue eyes – who I live with in Leerdam, says the same. But she has no problems with it. I am a chemical lab technician, but I am currently unemployed. I clearly have trouble holding down a job. A boss accused me of having a Mediterranean mentality: take it easy, no stress, tomorrow is also possible. I did my best and tried to finish my work, but sometimes I just couldn't. In the meantime I have been back to Colombia for a second time, but I have not found my biological parents. My adoptive parents said that they brought me to the Netherlands because my real parents could not take care of me. From stories I gather that there is a good chance that they could. It is a blow when you find out. By the way, I have a very positive attitude and absolutely do not see myself as a victim. I am not happy with my adoption, but I am a happy person.”

“I am not an angry adopted child”
Marcia Engel (31): “In Colombia, where I was born, my name was Martha, but when I was two and a half and was adopted by a couple from Het Gooi, my name was changed to Marcia. Later, I heard from an aunt that I cried a lot and had nightmares. For my adoptive parents, it was the best time of their lives, something like the birth of a child, but for me, my first time in the Netherlands must have been a trauma. My problems initially consisted of small things. Many adopted children eat from bite-swallow-gone. It is a form of survival. If you, as parents, do not know that it is actually normal, it is considered undesirable behavior. That simply has a negative effect. I soon thought: there is something wrong with me, I am crazy. I always wanted to go to my room. That is what you want anyway as a teenager, but I found shared family situations extremely difficult. I felt like an 'alien'. It was only when I was eleven that my mother told me that I did not come from her belly. The ground fell away from under my feet. That caused a lot of emotional problems. I started lying about everything and was rebellious. After my parents divorced, I ended up in emergency shelters, but no one there knew how to deal with an adopted child. Then I was taken in by a foster family with more adopted children. Fortunately, they knew how to do it there. If you don't know where you come from, you can't look to the future. That's the basic problem of many adopted children. For a long time, I wandered aimlessly through life. Only after I found my biological parents in Colombia could I start discovering myself. Someone who made a business out of it tracked them down for me. My adoption papers are simply forged. My date of birth is January 1, but that's not correct at all. It also says: parents unknown. But if you pay for it, then they can suddenly be found. My biological parents never signed for my adoption.
In fact, my father searched for me for a long time, but when he arrived at the orphanage where I was, he was told: you're too late, she's already gone. Like many adopted children, I was very angry for a long time about how things went. But I don't hold a grudge. When I knew how things were, I discovered how unique I actually was. Fate apparently struck in such a way that I had to be here. I don't want to go through life feeling pitiful, but be a success.
My husband and I have been living in Amsterdam for ten years.
We have two sons. That's going well. I recognize myself in my children. At home and at my work at a debt collection agency, my temperament can sometimes flare up in conflict situations, but I have learned to control myself. I have a good relationship with my adoptive father. He has changed his mind. He now says: I didn't know what kind of problems adoption could cause for a child. I did what I thought was best at the time."

Source: Eindhovens Dagblad

 bekijk dit artikel in PDF formaat Print artikel Verstuur artikel


 

Navigate through the articles
Vorig artikel Mother of foundling Lilly not in jail for the time beingNo punishment for illegal adoption Volgend artikel




 

Sponsor advertisement

© Adoption Meeting Point 1998-2009

Free counter and web stats

‘Can’t Have Everything in Life’: SC to Unmarried Woman Seeking Permission to Use a Surrogate

According to the Surrogacy Regulation Act, only those women who are widowed or divorced and between the age of 35 to 45 years can avail the surrogacy route. This implies that a single unmarried woman is not allowed to become a mother through surrogacy.


New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday (February 5) said that the institution of marriage needed to be protected unlike the West, where children are born outside of marriage, while hearing a petition on allowing surrogacy for unmarried women.

The bench, comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih, expressed its reservation while hearing the petition of a 44-year-old woman who approached the court seeking permission to become a mother through surrogacy, the Times of India reported.

According to the Surrogacy Regulation Act, only those women who are widowed or divorced and between the age of 35 to 45 years can avail the surrogacy route. This implies that a single unmarried woman is not allowed to become a mother through surrogacy.

“It is a norm here to become a mother within the institution of marriage. Being a mother outside the institution of marriage is not the norm. We are concerned about it. We are speaking from the point of view of (the) child’s welfare. Should the institution of marriage survive or not in the country? We are not like western countries. The institution of marriage has to be protected. You can call us and tag us conservative, and we accept it,” Justice Nagarathna observed.

Returning Home

"Thank you, Amma. Thank you so much," said Manikuttan before he was initiated into a mantra by Amma. "That orphanage was such a bad, bad place. I have so many bad memories of my time there. I feel so happy to know that you have taken it over and transformed it."

Manikuttan was nine years old when a Dutch couple adopted him and his sister from the Parippally Orphanage and took them back to live with them in Holland. This was in 1985, just before Amma's Ashram took the orphanage over and transformed it into Amrita Niketan, a loving home that provides the highest standard of education.

 

 

"That orphanage was a horrible place. I had a very, very bad time there," he said a few hours after his mantra deeksha. "They would beat us all the time, and there was nothing for us to do for entertainment. No games, no music. Nothing good to eat. Horrible schooling. We were forced to work all the time in this tile factory. When we were sent toys, the people who ran the orphanage would just sell them off; we would never get them."

When Manikuttan decided to come to the Massport Arena to have Amma's darshan, he had no idea that Amma had taken over the orphanage {news} in which he had been raised. He found this out only when looking at information about the Ashram's charitable activities during Amma's programme.

"I've held a lot of anger in his heart towards my mother," he said. "Because really she gave me up twice: once when she sent me to the orphanage and a second time when she agreed to my adoption. In a way, I've held a lot of anger towards India too. I mean, I didn't want anything to do with that place, because I just associated it with all the bad times I had in the orphanage. Really bad things happened there. But now I believe there was a purpose behind my mother giving me away and me coming to live in Holland. It was fate. It was so that I could meet Amma here today. Now I want to go back to India. I feel that she is my real home. I want to live a spiritual life. Amma has awoken that desire within me. I am so happy to learn that she took over the orphanage."

Surrogate Mothers Also Have Right To Avail Maternity Leave: High Court

The court observed that a leave of 180 days is granted to female government employees on the adoption of a child up to one year of age in line with maternity leave as admissible to natural mothers for proper care of the adopted child.


Bhubaneswar:

Orissa High Court has recently ruled that female employees who become mothers through surrogacy have the same right to maternity leave and other benefits as provided to natural and adoptive mothers.

The single judge bench of Justice SK Panigrahi gave the ruling on June 25 while hearing a petition filed by Supriya Jena, a female Odisha Finance Service (OFS) officer, in 2020.

Jena became a mother through surrogacy, but she was denied 180 days maternity leave by her higher authority in the Odisha government. So, she moved the high court against the government.