Today it is a year since Dennis Knudsen's daughter passed away - and the loss is still very much felt by the celebrity hairdresser.

Dennis Knudsen's daughter, Naomi, was just 7 weeks old when she died of unexplained cot death. The daughter's death came as a sudden shock, and Dennis Knudsen was struck by a great sadness - a sadness that still fills a great deal a year later.

Today is one year since Dennis Knudsen lost his daughter. In the most beautiful way, Dennis Knudsen has made a touching post in which he sends a tribute to Naomi, where he also shares pictures of the little girl.

A bench of justices BV Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih noted that a matter related to the Surrogacy Act is already pending in the top court.

The Supreme Court on Friday sought the response of the Centre on a petition challenging the bar under the Surrogacy Act that prevents married couples who already have a child from having a second child through surrogacy.

Issuing notice on a petition filed by a married couple, a bench of justices BV Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih noted that a matter related to the Surrogacy Act is already pending in the top court in a petition filed by IVF specialist Arun Muthuvel in which the amendments to the law barring single unmarried woman and homosexual couples are under challenge. The bench directed the matter to be heard on May 3.

Advocate Mohini Priya, who filed the latest petition, told the court that it challenges the constitutional validity of Section 4(iii)(C)(ii) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, which makes an intending couple ineligible to avail of surrogacy if they have any healthy surviving child biologically or through adoption or surrogacy, thus excluding married couples suffering from secondary infertility.

“The choice of reproduction has been held to be a part of the right to life under Article 21 by the Supreme Court, and the said choices also fall within the right to privacy and that the Act severely regulates these rights, so much so, that the fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 stand defeated,” the petition said.

A bench of justices BV Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih noted that a matter related to the Surrogacy Act is already pending in the top court.

The Supreme Court on Friday sought the response of the Centre on a petition challenging the bar under the Surrogacy Act that prevents married couples who already have a child from having a second child through surrogacy.

Issuing notice on a petition filed by a married couple, a bench of justices BV Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih noted that a matter related to the Surrogacy Act is already pending in the top court in a petition filed by IVF specialist Arun Muthuvel in which the amendments to the law barring single unmarried woman and homosexual couples are under challenge. The bench directed the matter to be heard on May 3.

Advocate Mohini Priya, who filed the latest petition, told the court that it challenges the constitutional validity of Section 4(iii)(C)(ii) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, which makes an intending couple ineligible to avail of surrogacy if they have any healthy surviving child biologically or through adoption or surrogacy, thus excluding married couples suffering from secondary infertility.

“The choice of reproduction has been held to be a part of the right to life under Article 21 by the Supreme Court, and the said choices also fall within the right to privacy and that the Act severely regulates these rights, so much so, that the fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 stand defeated,” the petition said.

A bench of justices BV Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih noted that a matter related to the Surrogacy Act is already pending in the top court.

The Supreme Court on Friday sought the response of the Centre on a petition challenging the bar under the Surrogacy Act that prevents married couples who already have a child from having a second child through surrogacy.

Issuing notice on a petition filed by a married couple, a bench of justices BV Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih noted that a matter related to the Surrogacy Act is already pending in the top court in a petition filed by IVF specialist Arun Muthuvel in which the amendments to the law barring single unmarried woman and homosexual couples are under challenge. The bench directed the matter to be heard on May 3.

Advocate Mohini Priya, who filed the latest petition, told the court that it challenges the constitutional validity of Section 4(iii)(C)(ii) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, which makes an intending couple ineligible to avail of surrogacy if they have any healthy surviving child biologically or through adoption or surrogacy, thus excluding married couples suffering from secondary infertility.

“The choice of reproduction has been held to be a part of the right to life under Article 21 by the Supreme Court, and the said choices also fall within the right to privacy and that the Act severely regulates these rights, so much so, that the fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 stand defeated,” the petition said.

The Supreme Court denied a 44-year-old single woman's surrogacy plea, citing the importance of preserving marriage in India and rejecting Western norms of children born out of wedlock.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused the plea of a 44-year-old unmarried woman to become a mother through surrogacy, saying that the institution of marriage must be protected and preserved in the country, and it cannot follow the model of Western countries where children are born outside of marriage.

A bench of Justices BV Nagarthana and Augustine George Masih stated that a single woman bearing a child outside marriage was the exception rather than the rule in Indian society.

According to the Surrogacy Regulation Act, only those women who are widowed or divorced and between the ages of 35 and 45 years can avail the surrogacy route. This means that a single unmarried woman is not allowed to become a mother through surrogacy.

"It is a norm here to become a mother within the institution of marriage. Being a mother outside the institution of marriage is not the norm. We are concerned about it. We are speaking from the point of view of a child's welfare. Should the institution of marriage survive or not in the country? We are not like Western countries. The institution of marriage has to be protected. You can call us and tag us conservative, and we accept it," the top court observed while hearing the woman's plea.

Petitioner's ex-husband filed for divorce when she was 9 months pregnant & has never seen their son. She asks for exemption from consent requirement so her new husband can adopt the child.

New Delhi: A case involving a former couple has brought a pertinent legal issue before the Supreme Court on the question of consent by a former spouse if a parent and her current spouse want to adopt a child of the former couple. 

The petitioner, a Supreme Court lawyer, approached the top court demanding a direction to the registrar of birth and death in New Delhi to register the adoption deed by her and her now-husband, the child’s stepfather. 

She demanded that this adoption be allowed without her former husband’s consent, asserting that “the peculiar facts in the present case put the petitioner in an impossible situation to seek the requisite consent from her former husband”. 

Among other things, she pointed out that “the former husband has not seen the child even once till date, including the time of the birth”. Narrating the facts of her case, she highlighted the difficulty she faced in approaching her former husband, also a lawyer, for his consent for the adoption.

The Surrogacy Act was enacted to prevent the commercialisation of surrogacy. Our investigation uncovered a clandestine surrogacy racket operating with greater secrecy than organ trafficking.

Surrogacy has been a thriving business in India since the beginning of the millennium. However, unethical medical practices and the exploitation of surrogates have cast a shadow over the practice in the country, which once gained a reputation of being a 'rent a womb' haven for childless couples.

The commercialisation of the unregulated sector gave rise to "surrogacy tourism" as foreign couples flocked to India. This prompted the government to bring legislation to ban commercial surrogacy in 2021. However, clinics exploiting impoverished women and human trafficking for surrogacy have turned out to be a menace despite regulations.

To gauge the ground situation in such clinics, India Today spoke to many fertility centres in Delhi-NCR. A probe reveals that the illicit trade persists and its operations have merely shifted underground.

The reporter, under the guise of a woman looking for a surrogate mother, visited a fertility clinic in Gurugram. Here, the reporter gave her identity as 'Divya'. After being made to fill a detailed form, the reporter is then greeted by a coordinator or an agent at the clinic.

There is a misconception among people that children will be given for adoption through various hospitals in the State, say the Commission representatives

Andhra Pradesh State Child Rights Protection Commission (APSCRPC) has called upon all stakeholders to encourage only legal adoptions.

An awareness programme for gynaecologists, paediatricians, nursing, paramedical and other staff of King George Hospital (KGH) was organised jointly by APSCRPC and the KGH at the Ethics Gallery of the hospital on Tuesday.

Chairperson Kesali Appa Rao and Member Gondu Sitaram, CWC Chairperson MLR Radha, KGH Superintendent P. Sivananda, District ICDS Project Officer Jayadevi, Hospital Assistant Director Ch. Srinivas Kumar and CSRMO Dhavala Bhaskara Rao participated in the programme.

The ICDS PO gave a PowerPoint presentation on ‘official adoptions’.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.17967 OF 2023 (GM - RES) BETWEEN: 1 . SRI RAVI KUMAR C., AGED 43 YEARS, S/O CHANNIGARAYACHAR C., 2 . SMT. B. TANUJA AGED 42 YEARS, W/O SRI RAVI KUMAR C., BOTH THE ABOVE PETITIONERS RESIDING PERMANENTLY AT NO.34, GOPAL KRISHNA LAYOUT, VASANTHAPURA MAIN ROAD, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST, BEHIND SAMASTHA HOSPITAL UTTARHALLI BENGALURU – 560 061. ALSO AT NO.C4, TAJ VILLAS, GREVELLIA GROOVE, BROOKSIDE DRIVE, WESTLAN

Dusk at the Dawn : A Study of Unwed Mother in Odisha

Ms. Sunita Behera, Dr. Ranjita Behera

Women’s Studies Reserarch Center, Berhampur University, Berhampur

*Corresponding Author E-mail: