https://odishabarta.com/spain-couple-adopted-2-children-from-gajapati-district/

The Supreme Court on Friday (13.10.2023), raised serious concerns over the delays in the adoption process and the potential impact on both aspiring parents and children in need of loving homes. The remarks came from a bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the simplification of adoption procedures in the country, filed by "The Temple of Healing," a charitable trust. 

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati requested additional time to file a response to the PIL, which prompted Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to express his apprehension. He raised questions about the delays in the adoption process, highlighting that it has virtually come to a standstill, leaving couples waiting for years.

"They are saying that the process of adoption has virtually come to a standstill. No adoptions are being allowed. Couples are being made to wait three years, four years. What happens with the delay of the government, CARA (https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-courtallows-woman-who-sought-abortion-to-give-child-for-adoption-to-acouple-registered-with-cara-220572) particularly– suppose a couple decides to adopt at 26, by the time they get the adoption through, they are 30, 31. People's core position in life changes," the CJI stated.

The CJI further emphasized on the effects of bureaucratic delays on individuals and families. He asserted– "Suppose someone wants to adopt at 35, they get delayed and now they are 39, 40, they may feel that it is too late to adopt (https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/bombay-high-court-adoptionsingle-working-women-single-parent-adoptive-parent-juvenile-justice-act226213). Parental position changes. We understand that possibly there is an element of misuse that you are apprehending but why are you stalling adoptions? There are hundreds and thousands of children waiting for adoption."

John and Katherine Snyder are facing a total of 26 charges for murder, assault and child endangerment

CINCINNATI — Seven years after the death of their child, two parents accused of abusing and murdering the 8-year-old are officially on trial.

John and Katherine Snyder are facing 26 charges combined for murder, aggravated assault and child endangerment.

The two were arrested in upstate New York in September 2022. They are accused of abusing their children, several of whom were adopted from China, and killing one — Adam.

According to the prosecution, all of the Snyder children were malnourished, deprived of medical care and more.

The St. Gallen adoption broker Alice Honegger placed babies from “fallen mothers” abroad – sometimes with the knowledge of the authorities. 

An “illegitimate” child often brought women into great distress in the 1950s and 1960s. They became the focus of the authorities, they were put into homes, institutions and women's prisons and “ administratively cared for ”. At the same time, they were pressured to give their babies up for adoption.

Now research by the Observer shows for the first time what happened to the babies: an unknown number were sold off to childless couples abroad. The controversial adoption broker Alice Honegger was also the puller.

It is known and confirmed by various research studies that the St. Gallen woman fulfilled the desire of Swiss couples to have children for 50 years - using ethically questionable methods. Various research studies prove this. Starting in the 1970s, she brought hundreds of babies from Sri Lanka to Switzerland under illegal circumstances . The entries on the adoption certificates were often fictitious; women in Sri Lanka signed them for money, even though they were not the birth mothers (see “Questionable adoptions are investigated,” below).

note accompanying letter to Parliament about Woo decisions regarding intercountry adoption

Woo request on correspondence with country analysis of intercountry adoption

Last month, this gang allegedly kidnapped a two years old girl from Malad, took her to Malwani and later Nashik where they wanted to sell her for Rs two lakh, said a Kurar police station official here

MUMBAI: A gang which allegedly sold babies to needy couples has been busted here with the arrest of six persons from Nashik and Mumbai, police said on Tuesday.

The accused were identified as Irfan Khan (26), Salauddin Sayyed (23), Adil Khan (19), Taukeer Sayyed (26), Raza Sheikh and Samadhan Jagtap.

Last month, this gang allegedly kidnapped a two years old girl from Malad, took her to Malwani and later Nashik where they wanted to sell her for Rs two lakh, said a Kurar police station official here

MUMBAI: A gang which allegedly sold babies to needy couples has been busted here with the arrest of six persons from Nashik and Mumbai, police said on Tuesday.

The Karnataka High Court has directed the trial court to reconsider the petition filed under Section 8 and 9 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, by a member of the Scheduled Caste community residing at Jamakhandi, seeking to adopt a 19 year old. A single judge bench of Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum said adopting a major child was a legally recognised custom in Jamakhandi governed by the Bombay School of Hindu Law

“If petitioners are permanent residents of Jamakhandi, then I am of the view that since there is no dispute that Jamakhandi which was erstwhile princely State and part of Bombay province, the custom of adopting a major child is judicially recognized and therefore, I am of the view that the proof of the said custom is not necessary.”

The petition was filed by Sharada Walagad and Shrishail Shankareppa who had challenged the trial court's order rejecting their application for adoption

The impugned order pertained to a plea filed under Sections 8 and 9 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, seeking permission to allow Walagad to act as the guardian of Shankareppa and, consequently, to permit her to adopt Shankareppa. 

The petitioners, in this case, are residents of Jamakhandi, Karnataka. Petitioner no.1 was a retired government employee who claims to have lost her husband and has no biological children. Petitioner no.2 was a distant relative of petitioner no.1 and had lost both his parents during childhood. The petitioners initiated the petition, seeking permission for petitioner No.1 to adopt petitioner No.2. They cited a custom of adopting individuals aged over 15 years

Diplomatic stars like highly visible special envoys apart, practitioners of diplomacy are rarely to be found in the limelight of media attention. Not so for Dmitri Borodin, Minister-Counselor at the Russian Embassy in The Hague.

The Russian diplomat is at the center of a nasty diplomatic row between Russia and the Netherlands. Neighbors called the local police when the diplomat, supposedly excessively drunk, was seen to maltreat his own children. Four police officers rang the Borodins’ doorbell and took the diplomat away for questioning.

From the APEC summit in Bali, Indonesia, president Putin was quick to show his outrage. The same day Netherlands Foreign Minister Frans Timmermans offered a public apology to the Russian Federation.

Was the Russian government right to be so upset, and was it necessary for the Dutch to apologize?

The incident gives evidence of the incompatibility of two different legal worlds, with international law prevailing. Putin was quick to point out that the Dutch had overstepped their mark in what amounted to a breach of international rules on diplomatic immunity.

From: <IFG@bmj.bund.de>
Date: Mon 9. Oct 2023 at 18:34
Subject: Ihre Anfrage unter dem IFG
To:
Cc: <IFG@bmj.bund.de>
 

Bundesministerium der Justiz

Z B 6 – zu: 145101#00002#0297