childcare institutes (CCI) are currently running across India, out of which more than 1,100 are operating in Kerala, according to the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR).

As per NCPCR data, the total number of registered CCIs in India stands at 6,792. Currently, more than 2 lakh children (2,07,291) are living in CCIs, both registered and unregistered.

Maharashtra is the second state which has got the most number of unregistered CCIs - 110 followed by Manipur which has 13 CCIs running without registration.

The other states which have got unregistered CCIs are Delhi (6), Andhra Pradesh (3), Tamil Nadu (9), Arunachal Pradesh (3), Rajasthan (4), and Andaman and Nicobar Islands (1).

Assam and Bihar have two unregistered CCIs which are under the process of registration, while 49 unregistered CCIs identified in Delhi are undergoing registration process, according to the data.

Jayme Metzgar By Jayme Metzgar

MARCH 19, 2018

In September 2016, just as the presidential race was entering its final weeks, the State Department quietly proposed new regulations governing international adoption. Adoption advocates sounded the alarm, saying the regulations would severely hamper Americans’ ability to adopt overseas. I wrote about this for The Federalist just days before the November election.

Then, to almost everyone’s surprise, Donald Trump was elected president. On the day of his inauguration, Trump began a regulatory reform effort, announcing a moratorium on all new regulations from executive agencies. Ten days later, he issued an executive order requiring agencies to repeal two regulations for every new one they proposed.

Under this new scrutiny, the State Department soon withdrew its proposed adoption rule. Adoption advocates breathed a sigh of relief.

In September 2016, just as the presidential race was entering its final weeks, the State Department quietly proposed new regulations governing international adoption. Adoption advocates sounded the alarm, saying the regulations would severely hamper Americans’ ability to adopt overseas. I wrote about this for The Federalist just days before the November election.

Then, to almost everyone’s surprise, Donald Trump was elected president. On the day of his inauguration, Trump began a regulatory reform effort, announcing a moratorium on all new regulations from executive agencies. Ten days later, he issued an executive order requiring agencies to repeal two regulations for every new one they proposed.

Under this new scrutiny, the State Department soon withdrew its proposed adoption rule. Adoption advocates breathed a sigh of relief.

“If Trump hadn’t been elected, those regulations would have been implemented,” says Ron Stoddart, president of Save Adoptions. “It was his ban on new regulations that stopped them.”

Representative image

Representative image

CHENNAI: Underweight babies, those with vision problems and an infant with cleft lip and palate are among 28 children with “special needs” waiting to be adopted in Tamil Nadu. If data from the past is anything to go by, chances of them finding a family in India are slim.

Over the last four years, 88 such children were adopted from Tamil Nadu by couples abroad, while there were no adoptions by families within the country, social defence department data shows.

Untitled-1

Adoptive parents in India are usually reluctant to take in children with special needs and those who are above six years of age | Express

NEW DELHI: Like any other child of her age, Pihu (name changed), 8, was lively and naughty. She played and interacted with all other children in the adoption centre where she was kept. Except that she suffers from thalassemia trait, making her mildly anaemic.

Because of this “abnormality,” prospective adoptive parents in India shunned her after seeing her profile. But luck finally smiled on Pihu last year when a couple from Spain took her as their daughter.

Pihu’s story is not a one-off. About 1,000 ‘special needs’ children with adoption agencies are largely ignored by domestic couples looking to adopt a child. Even a minor or easily manageable health condition is enough to make prospective parents squirm. But adoptive parents from abroad have no such qualms.

Data from the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) under the Union Women and Child Development Ministry show that adoption of Indian children by foreigners and NRI parents has seen a remarkable growth.

Woman involved in trafficking of children has been arrested from Mumbai. She is on a 7-day remand. Child care centre operator Radhika Sahu was arrested from Mumbai on Friday by Hiranmagri police. She is now on a 7-day remand and will be investigated regarding trafficking of innocent kids. It may be noted that Radhika Sahu has been illegally operating a Child care centre in Sector 3 Hiranmagri.

Investigating officer had obtained production warrant from District Court for arresting Radhika Sahu. Radhika is on a remand until 22nd March. Operator of Child care centre, Radhika Sahu was arrested in Mumbai from restaurant by Meera Road Police, Mumbai. Along with her Puja, a resident from Mumbai, and Puja’s husband Ashish were also arrested. Reportedly Puja had handed over her infant to Radhika 2 months back since she did not want to keep her own child. As per a deal, Puja had sold her infant in 6 lakh rupees. She had asked for Radhika’s assistance in this matter since they both are friends with each other.

These two friends unknowingly went to settle the deal with a police officer in Mumbai and got trapped. Mumbai police arrested these ladies and sent them behind bars from where they were brought to Udaipur on Friday on transit warrant.

Upon getting information of child trafficking, Udaipur police had raided the Child care centre in Hiranmagri Sector 3 from where they found 2 kids who were kept illegally. As per information given to police, one of the child belonged to a woman in Sundervas and the other was from Jhadol. The woman from Sundervas pleaded helplessness in taking care of the child and handed the child to Child Helpline. Police is yet to find out details of parents of the other child who is from Jhadol. Details of this girl’s parents are known to Radhika Sahu. Until further information, both the children have been handed over to Child Welfare Committee.

.

Child Trafficking Through International Adoption Continues Despite Regulations

By Joshua Philipp, The Epoch Times

March 15, 2018 10:09 am Last Updated: March 28, 2018 3:20 pm

Two displaced Iraqi sisters from Mosul, play at an orphanage in Arbil, the capital of the Kurdish autonomous region in northern Iraq, on April 30, 2017. (SAFIN HAMED/AFP/Getty Images)

ShareTweetShareEmail

Former Lazard Banker’s Home Raided in Rio Tinto Probe

By Franz Wild and Thomas Biesheuvel

15 March 2018, 12:21 CET Updated on 15 March 2018, 15:43 CET

SFO led raid on Francois de Combret’s home late last year

Friend of Guinean president, de Combret helped on Rio deal

There are many takers for this in the West. But it’s a trend fraught with danger, not least for the babies

We’ve heard of banks for breast milk, meant for mothers who for some medical reason or emergency, are unable to breastfeed their babies. But a new, dangerous trend is setting in, particularly in developed countries such as the US and UK, where online sale of breast milk is getting more and more takers.

Last week the British Medical Journal ( BMJ) came out with an editorial in which the doctors leading an ongoing research study at the University of London warned mothers buying breast milk online of a high probability of such milk being contaminated.

Not only do their babies face serious health risks due to multiple infections, they said, their very lives could be in danger.

This is because unlike milk banks where the expressed breast milk is pasteurised and stored scientifically, and the donors screened for infections such as HIV, herpes and so on, the online market is totally unregulated.

March 4 was a usual Sunday in the life of 27-year-old actor Preeti Sood, a resident of Versova Mumbai until a series of events turned it into perhaps one of the most dramatic days of her life.

It all began with a phone call. It was from a friend who had just had an appointment at the beauty parlour in the vicinity of Preeti’s house. She told her that there were two minor girls at a salon, who were accompanied by some men. The men were ‘barking orders at the salon staff’ to do their makeup. Even though the salon ladies kept reiterating that such minor girls (aged 7 and 11) did not need that kind of loud makeup, the men kept pushing for it.

It seemed suspicious.

Without wasting any time, Preeti rushed to the salon.

mumbai actor traffickers