Home  

Women head east for wombs to rent


Women head east for wombs to rent
 
Banned from paying someone to carry a child at home, women travel to Ukraine in search of surrogate mothers.
 Last Modified: 06 Dec 2010 11:57 GMT
Increasing numbers of infertile women are travelling to Ukraine because of its relaxed laws on commercial surrogacy[GALLO/GETTY]

"No drinking, no smoking, no taking drugs and eat healthily." As she lists the rules she wants her future surrogate mother to abide by, the voice of Rumyana Nencheva, 34, a dentist from Varna, Bulgaria, gets thinner and quieter.

Nencheva has come to Ukraine, seeking a surrogate mother. Diagnosed with uterine cancer in June 2008, she cannot bear a child of her own.

The 'infertility epidemic'

According to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, ESHRE, in 2010, one in six couples in the world suffers from infertility.

In up to 35 per cent of cases, ESHRE says, this is down to physiological reasons in the woman. An average of nine out of 100 women aged 20 to 44 cannot have a child.

"Infertility is turning into an epidemic whose peak we have yet to see," says Georgi Stamenov, the head of Nadezhda (Hope), one of the main centres for reproductive health in Sofia.

She is a part of a growing phenomenon of women who are unable to get pregnant - and facing a ban on surrogate pregnancy at home - travel thousands of miles to Ukraine to rent another woman's womb.

Victims of society's stigma against childless women, especially in the Balkans, they also confront the hostility of the law in most countries to paid-for surrogacy.

They are drawn to Ukraine by the former Soviet republic's relaxed laws on commercial surrogacy, its relatively developed medical infrastructure - and the price.

Most women heading for Ukraine come from western Europe and the Americas - only they can usually afford the fees. But a growing number, like Nencheva, are middle-class professionals from the Balkans for whom the cost is still a huge sacrifice.

The staff at the International Surrogate Motherhood Center (ISMC), in Kharkov, Ukraine, tell Nencheva that she is not the only woman with that name from Bulgaria to have travelled more than 2,000km to Kharkov.

"We have many patients from the Balkans," the woman at the centre confides. While there, Nencheva spots another Balkan traveller, Snezhana, a rotund Macedonian in her forties.

Ethical dilemma

For women who want to escape the taboo on childlessness, and who do not want to adopt, the only solution is to find a surrogate mother who will carry their egg to maturity.

For most governments, however, surrogacy raises serious ethical dilemmas, mainly concerning women being paid to carry children for someone else.

That is why no European Union country allows commercial surrogacy, and why women seeking to rent a womb have to head east to Ukraine, Russia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, or even further afield to India.

In the EU, Austria, Germany, Sweden, France, Hungary and Italy prohibit all forms of surrogacy, paid-for or not. Britain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and Greece allow surrogacy, as long as no commercial element is involved.

Ukrainian law, by contrast, is the most surrogacy-friendly in Europe. Article 123.2 of Ukraine's Family Code stipulates that women may receive financial compensation to carry someone else's child, and the law places no limits on the amount that can be paid.

The law also guarantees the biological mother's legal rights to the child or children born in the surrogate mother's womb. No adoption process or court order of any kind is required. The entire process is regulated by a contract signed between the agency or clinic, the biological mother and the surrogate mother.

By this, the surrogate mother surrenders all rights to the child carried in her womb. Only the names of the biological parents are entered on the birth certificate.

Valery Zukin, the vice-president of the Ukrainian Association of Reproductive Medicine (UARM), says 150 to 200 paid-for surrogate motherhood cycles take place in the country each year.

About half of the women renting these Ukrainian women's wombs are foreigners, usually from the US, Britain, France, Sweden and Italy, but also from Balkan countries.

Cheaper in Kiev

A curse in the Balkans

In Balkan societies the taboo against childlessness is especially strong. Here "the inability to conceive a child, and carry it to maturity, is regarded as abnormal," says Bulgarian psychologist Yana Pacholova.

"If people learn about it, the woman experiences shame, reproachful glances, negative attitudes, whispers behind her back, isolation and being pointed out by society," she adds.

Fear of barren women in Bulgaria is handed down the generations. Folklore teaches that childlessness is a curse and a disease.

In some parts of the Balkans, the families of a childless woman give her the child of a relative to bring up as her own, according to Violeta Stan, a child psychiatrist in Timisoara, western Romania.

But, among the Roma, the inability of a woman to conceive can lead to the annulment of the marriage. Among the Kardash community in Bulgaria, meanwhile, a mother-in-law can even chase away an infertile daughter-in-law.

The law is not the only reason why women seeking wombs to rent come to Ukraine.

"The main reason ... is the price," claims Marina Vasilieva, a patients' coordinator at New Life, a surrogacy centre that opened a permanent office in Kiev in March this year.

The ISMC in Kharkov initially quoted Rumyana Nencheva around 21,760 euros [about $29,000] for its services. Prices depend on the state of the biological mother's ovaries and on whether she requires donor sperm or not.

New Life in Kiev charges in American dollars. Its price is higher, at about $35,000, [26,000 euros], including an egg donation.

This is still only about one-third of the price charged in those US states, such as Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, Virginia and California, that permit commercial surrogacy.

For renting out their wombs, the agencies in Ukraine pay surrogate mothers from $7,000 [5,080 euros] in Kharkov to $12,000 [around 8,700 euros] in Kiev.

Beside that, would-be parents are expected to pay the women about $290 per month in support fees, or a total of about $2,610 for the whole pregnancy.

"They also pay for medical expenses during the pregnancy and for monitoring," Vassilieva explains.

"The terms for our surrogate mothers are quite good, for Ukraine," she says but stresses that being a surrogate mother is not an instant passport to wealth.

A single-bedroom apartment in the capital, Kiev, costs around $80,000 [about 58,000 euros]. Vassilieva notes that is at least six times the average fee a surrogate mother earns.

However, Ukrainian law does not limit the number of surrogate pregnancies a woman may carry.

Too pricey for the Balkans

While prices in Ukraine are far lower than in the US, they are well above what most people in Balkan countries can afford. It is far too costly for Ani Dimova, a frail-looking young woman from Asenovgrad in Bulgaria.

She still remembers her deep shock on discovering in her teens that she would never conceive. "At first, my parents tried to hide it from me," she says.

"I was 14 and had just had my first check-up in hospital. I went outside and waited for them in the car. When my mum came out, she was crying." 

Though naturally smiley, Dimova says few days go by when she is not reminded that she cannot have her own child. "I've thought about going somewhere where surrogacy is possible but the prices are very high," she says.

"They're not for the likes of us. In Ukraine, you'd need about 50,000 Bulgarian leva [around $34,000] saved up."

According to Bulgarian social anthropologist Haralan Alexandrov, today's more conservative climate on surrogacy - and the silence surrounding the issue - reflects the strength of patriarchal values in the region.

"Suffering is not to be talked about," he says. "There's no evil intent here, it's just how our culture operates."

In Varna, following weeks of online communication with the clinic in Ukraine, Rumyana Nencheva is back to square one.

Doctors at the Kharkov clinic have concluded that while her ovaries are not exhausted, they are almost so. Unsure whether she has a usable egg, the clinic has decided not to take her on. She finds it hard to decide on her next move.

Ani Dimova is considering moving to a country where surrogacy is permitted. Of Bulgaria's current ban, she says: "I don't want to think it will stay forbidden forever."

Doroteya Nicolova is a Varna-based journalist and editor. This article was produced as part of the Balkan Fellowship for Journalistic Excellence, an initiative of the Robert Bosch Stiftung and ERSTE Foundation, in cooperation with the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network.

Noted Therapist of Internationally AdoptionChildren Sues Critics

December 06, 2010

'He kept sending me teddy bears': How this unlikely lothario ran up a list of conquests

'He kept sending me teddy bears': How this unlikely lothario ran up a list of conquests

By EMILY ANDREWS

UPDATED: 00:18 GMT, 6 December 2010

0 View

comments

Russia, U.S. must agree 4 key points to complete adoption talks - ombudsman

Russia, U.S. must agree 4 key points to complete adoption talks - ombudsman

Topic:

 

Russian Children's Rights Ombudsman Pavel Astakhov

13:56 03/12/2010

© RIA Novosti. Grigory Sysoev

 

Related News

Russia and the United States have to work out a common position on four remaining points concerning child adoption in order to complete long-standing talks and conclude an intergovernmental adoption agreement, Russian Children's Rights Ombudsman Pavel Astakhov said on Friday.

"Four points, the most complicated, have yet to be agreed. These are acquisition of citizenship, control over the relocation of children, 'post-adoption,' when the first adoption is abolished and a second comes into force, Astakhov said.

"The fourth point is the ratification of the agreement itself," he continued.

The fifth round of talks between Russian and U.S. experts on the ratification of the child adoption agreement started in Washington on Wednesday.

"Everything should come to an end today. If the Americans accept all our stipulations, this will be the last round of talks," he said.

Astakhov said earlier that he might push for a freeze on adoptions of Russian children by U.S. citizens if Russia and the United States fail to seal an adoption agreement by early 2011.

Russia is one of the largest sources of adoptions for U.S. families, accounting for about 10 percent of foreign adoptions. The mistreatment of Russian children adopted in the United States has attracted public attention in recent months as a result of a number of highly publicized incidents.

In April, a 7-year-old boy was placed alone on a one-way flight to Moscow by his U.S. adoptive mother with a note claiming he was "psychopathic."

Following the case, Russia threatened to prohibit child adoptions by U.S. citizens until the countries sign an intergovernmental agreement guaranteeing the rights of adopted children.

MOSCOW, December 3 (RIA Novosti)

 

 Talks on bilateral child adoption agreement

INVESTIGATION OF ABUSE OF POWER EUROPEAN COMMISSION

SP Member of Parliament Nine Kooiman and SP MEP Dennis de Jong want clarification about the report that the European Commission is trying to gain more power over the heads of adopted children. A quality Romanian newspaper revealed today that the European Commission has pressured researchers to conclude that there is a need for a European Adoption Agency when the underlying research does not support that conclusion. Kooiman: 'We are all aware of the desire for more resources and more power from the European Commission, but I would find it terrible that the problems surrounding adoption would be used for that. Adopted children in particular deserve extra protection and care. '

Adoption scandals in the past have prompted Romania to stop intercountry adoptions. Attempts would now be made to force Romania to reopen its borders to adoptions. Rumors about establishing a European adoption policy have been around for some time. Kooiman: 'I recently asked a number of critical questions about this, but they have not yet been answered. But today's revelation goes even further than what I suspected. ”

The SP is not in favor of stimulating intercountry adoptions at a European level, because the starting point must be that children can grow up in their original environment as much as possible. Adoption from abroad is also a vulnerable process. Kooiman: 'If it is true that the European Commission is manipulating research results, we have a problem. Not only because it is unacceptable that studies are being adapted so that Europe can take more power. But mainly because these are vulnerable children. The best interests of the child must come first, not the interests of the European Commission. '

Kooiman has put written questions to the State Secretary of Foreign Affairs and the State Secretary of Justice, who deal with adoption. Dennis de Jong has asked the Commission for clarification.

****************************************************************************************************************************

INVESTIGATION OF POWER ABUSE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

SP Member of Parliament Nine Kooiman and SP MEP Dennis de Jong want clarification about the report that the European Commission is trying to seize more power over the heads of adopted children. A quality Romanian newspaper revealed today that the European Commission has pressured researchers to conclude that there is a need for a European Adoption Agency when the underlying research does not support that conclusion. Kooiman: 'We all know the desire for more resources and more power from the European Commission, but I would find it terrible that the problems surrounding adoption would be used for that. Adopted children in particular deserve extra protection and care. '

Adoption scandals in the past have prompted Romania to stop intercountry adoptions. Attempts would now be made to force Romania to reopen its borders to adoptions. Rumors about establishing a European adoption policy have been around for some time. Kooiman: 'I recently asked a number of critical questions about this, but they have not yet been answered. But today's revelation goes even further than what I suspected. ”

The SP is not in favor of stimulating intercountry adoptions at a European level, because the starting point must be that children can grow up in their original environment as much as possible. Adoption from abroad is also a vulnerable process. Kooiman: 'If it is true that the European Commission is manipulating research results, we have a problem. Not only because it is unacceptable that studies are being adapted so that Europe can take more power. But mainly because these are vulnerable children. The best interests of the child must come first, not the interests of the European Commission. '

Kooiman has put written questions to the State Secretary of Foreign Affairs and the State Secretary of Justice about adoption. Dennis de Jong has asked the Commission for clarification.

.

INVESTIGATE ABUSE OF POWER EUROPEAN COMMISSION

SP Member of Parliament Nine Kooiman and SP MEP Dennis de Jong want clarification about the message that the European Commission is trying to draw more power over the heads of adopted children. A quality Romanian newspaper revealed today that the European Commission has been pressuring researchers to conclude that there is a need for a European Adoption Agency when the underlying research does not support that conclusion. Kooiman: 'We are all aware of the European Commission's desire for more resources and more power, but I would find it terrible that the problems surrounding adoption are used for this. Adopted children in particular deserve extra protection and care.'

Past adoption scandals have prompted Romania to stop intercountry adoptions. Now, efforts would be made to force Romania to reopen its borders to adoptions. The rumors about establishing a European adoption policy have been around for some time. Kooiman: 'I recently asked a number of critical questions about this, but they have not yet been answered. But today's revelation goes even further than I suspected.'

The SP is not in favor of promoting intercountry adoptions in Europe, because the basic principle must be that children can grow up in their original environment as much as possible. Moreover, adoption from abroad is a vulnerable process. Kooiman: 'If it is true that the European Commission manipulates research results, we have a problem. Not only because it is unacceptable that investigations are modified so that Europe can take more power. But especially because it concerns vulnerable children. The best interests of the child must come first, not the interests of the European Commission.'

Kooiman has put written questions to the State Secretary for Foreign Affairs and the State Secretary for Justice, who deals with adoption. Dennis de Jong has asked the Commission for clarification.

.

U.S. hopes to finalize talks on child adoption with Russia this week

U.S. hopes to finalize talks on child adoption with Russia this week

01 Dec 2010  

The United States hopes to finalize an agreement on child adoptions with Russia this week and sign it in the nearest future, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of State said.“Officials have met four times in both Washington and Moscow to negotiate this agreement that provides greater safeguards for children and families in the adoption process between the two countries, and we will anticipate that these talks tomorrow will be – with officials on both sides – reviewing the final text so that there can be a signing in the near future,” Assistant Secretary Philip Crowley told.
Russia and the United States are holding the fifth round of talks on drafting a child adoption agreement in Washington on December 1-3. The U.S. official also added that the United States hopes to conclude the process during this round of talks with Russia “but the formal agreement will not be signed.”

Source: RIA Novosti

WikiLeaks runs first confidential cable wire from Romania on adoption cases

WikiLeaks runs first confidential cable wire from Romania on adoption cases


WikiLeaks has published the first confidential document sent from the US Embassy in Bucharest to the US. The document, sent in 2006 by the then US Ambassador to Bucharest Nicholas Taubman refers to adoption cases. “On April 5, Embassy received by mail a letter from Theodora Bertzi, Secretary of State for the Government of Romania,s (GOR) Romanian Office for Adoptions (ROA), dated March 29 and including the final report of the GOR Working Group established in June 2005 to audit pending petitions by foreign families to adopt Romanian orphans and abandoned children,” writes the document. “‘The report shows that none of the 1,092 children identified in the pending petitions will be available for inter-country adoption, ostensibly for the following reasons,” the document goes on, further mentioning the reasons.

The Working Group had been expected to issue its report by the end of March, and Bertzi had announced publicly in December 2005 that none of the cases would be approved for inter-country adoption. However, the utterly non-transparent process of the Working Group and the opaque  quality of the report suggest some of the children may in fact remain in non-permanent situations in which their welfare is not being adequately protected. Post believes we should continue to press the GOR to open up the Working Group’s “conclusions” for a transparent, objective international review and to establish a legal framework that would allow inter-country adoption for appropriate pending  cases. We will provide Department with our updated recommendations soon,” ends the message.

Secret messages between the US Embassy in Romania and the US state were included in the 250,000 messages sent by American diplomats and recently revealed on WikiLeaks. The US Embassy in Bucharest sent around 775 secret messages to US, according to WikiLeaks. However, the US Embassy to Bucharest has recently said in a statement that by its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often raw information, preliminary and often incomplete, not an expression of policy, and nor does it always shape final policy decisions.

WikiLeaks is a not-for-profit media organization, a project of the Sunshine Press, founded by Julian Assange. “Our goal is to bring important news and information to the public. We provide an innovative, secure and anonymous way for sources to leak information to our journalists (our electronic drop box). One of our most important activities is to publish original source material alongside our news stories so readers and historians alike can see evidence of the truth,” writes the company.

editor@romania-insider.com

Related posts:

  1. Wednesday headlines: RCS & RDS launches TV station, Romania gets 2% of allotted EU funds, WikiLeaks paves way for Obama critics
  2. US Embassy to Bucharest responds to WikiLeaks messages: field reporting doesn’t always shape final policy decisions
  3. Messages sent from Romania, included in recent WikiLeaks documents
  4. Romania ranks fifth in top of spam source countries – Panda Security report
  5. Constitutional challenges no longer suspend lawsuits; future corruption cases unlocked