Home  

Grande campagne de lutte contre l’abandon et en faveur de l’adoption à la télévision roumaine

09 août 2011

Grande campagne de lutte contre l’abandon et en faveur de l’adoption à la télévision roumaine

 

Photo : © Thomas Coëx / AFP

 

Une grande campagne de sensibilisation s’est déroulée cet été sur la chaîne de télévision roumaine ProTV. Elle dénonce la situation des 40 000 enfants abandonnés en Roumanie.

Selon la chaîne, un bébé est abandonné à la maternité toutes les 6 heures dans le pays. Ils y restent parfois même jusqu’à un an avant d’être orientés chez des assistantes maternelles. Plusieurs documentaires montrent le quotidien des enfants institutionnalisés, des plus jeunes aux plus âgés, parlent de leur profond désir d’avoir une famille à eux, et tentent d’expliquer les raisons de l’abandon liées à la pauvreté et aux mentalités.

La campagne dénonce aussi l’extrême lenteur et l’inefficacité des procédures d’adoption nationale : avant de déclarer un enfant légalement abandonné et donc adoptable, trois décisions de justice distinctes doivent être prononcées. D’autre part, les parents naturels qui ont abandonné leur enfant restent impliqués dans le processus d’adoption et peuvent s’y opposer jusqu’à l’aboutissement. Une autre complexité du système est le fait qu’avant d’être déclaré adoptable, toutes les possibilités de réintégration de l’enfant dans sa famille naturelle, jusqu’au 4ème degré, doivent être étudiées. Oncles et tantes, grands-parents, grands-oncles et tantes et tous les cousins sont rencontrés et doivent déclarer ne pas s’opposer à l’adoption de l’enfant, ce qui peut représenter jusqu’à 50 personnes !

Alors que les besoins justifieraient un tribunal pour les mineurs et les familles par département, il n’en existe qu’un seul en Roumanie, situé dans la ville de Brasov, compétent pour résoudre ces questions, ce qui peut retarder le jugement jusqu’à deux ans. Plus l’enfant grandit et plus les dégâts de la vie en institution se font sentir, tandis que ses chances d’être adopté diminuent.


Bannière de la campagne " Moi aussi je veux des parents à moi "
 

Dans le cadre de cette campagne, une pétition demandant au gouvernement de changer les lois régissant l’adoption a été lancée sur internet et a déjà collecté plus de 75 200 signatures.

Le Docteur Bogdan Simion, directeur de SERA Romania* et président de la FONPC (Fédération des ONG pour l’enfant) a été interviewé dans le cadre de cette campagne.

*SERA (Solidarités Enfants Roumains Abandonnés) est un programme de l’association CARE.

> Découvrez le site internet de ProTV et l'intégralité de la campagne (en roumain) : http://stirileprotv.ro/campanii/vreau-si-eu-parintii-mei 

> Voir la pétition : http://vreausieuparintiimei.stirileprotv.ro/

Traduction du texte de la pétition :
"Nous voulons en Roumanie une loi sur les adoptions juste et efficace 
- Nous voulons qu’un enfant, dès lors que l’abandon par ses parents est établi, puisse être adopté d’urgence par des personnes qui ont le désir et la capacité de l’élever, qu’elles soient roumaines ou étrangères
- Nous voulons un tribunal compétent pour résoudre les questions liées à l’enfance dans chaque département du pays
- Nous voulons que les institutions, privées ou d’état, qui s’occupent des questions relatives aux enfants abandonnés par leurs parents, mettent au premier plan l’enfant, son développement harmonieux, ainsi que son équilibre émotionnel et psychologique
- Nous voulons la transparence et la simplification maximale du processus d’adoption, au bénéfice de l’enfant adoptable et des parents adoptifs
- Nous voulons qu’aucun enfant ayant la possibilité de grandir dans une vraie famille, ne reste dans un centre de placement. "

Cambodia reopens adoptions by Americans

Cambodia reopens adoptions by Americans

Published: Oct. 30, 2012 at 9:14 AM

Discussion SOS Gambia - luxerious

sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: gerryd ()
Datum: 29 oktober 2008 14:08

Hallo,

Volgens mij is er in de buurt van Serrakunda een SOS kinderdorp. Weet iemand van jullie waar de mensen daar de meeste behoefte aan hebben? Dank alvast. (of zijn er betere "doelen" waar we iets kunnen afgeven?)

*Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: nelart ()
Datum: 29 oktober 2008 14:22

Het lig eraan wat je mee wil nemen en of het niet beter is om hier zelf wat mensen mee blij te maken ? 
Verder kun je ook onderstaande mogelijkheid eens bekijken ! 





Kijk op Gambia Start-pagina bij kleindochters en hulp organisaties ! 

Hier vind je alle Stichtingen en organisaties die er in Gambia zijn ! 

Ik zelf denk dat het beter is om hieuit te kiezen wan SOS is van Unicef en het Lilianefonds zitten er ook bij in, ze zullen zelf genoeg middelen hebben om van alles te doen! 

Ook wij hebben een Stichting in Gambia en doen vooral veel om kinderen ut de sloppenwijken te helpen en andere noodzakelijke dingen zoals opknappen ziekehuisje, medische spullen meenemen, families van rijst voorzien enzv. 
op de hulppagina vind je ook onze stichting sharanie 
of mail me eventjes voor info !

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: awa ()
Datum: 29 oktober 2008 14:28

Sos kinderdorp draait al heel goed. Zier er goed uit, hebben goede middelen!
Ik denk dat er andere organisaties of families zijn die harder hulp nodig hebben.

Wat heb je voor soort hulp te bieden?

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: gerryd ()
Datum: 29 oktober 2008 15:04

ohooooo hoop niet dat ik te hoge verwachtingen heb gewekt (verwekt ;-)? We zitten gewoon te denken aan kleren enzo...

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: nelart ()
Datum: 29 oktober 2008 15:43



Gerry,

Mail me eventjes want ik weet hier wel mensen voor die dit heel hard nodig hebben !

Ons bestuur gaat met je mee om af te geven !

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: imagine ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 10:07

een dikke toyota of lexus is altijd welkom hoor, het valt op dat steeds meer ngo s zich verplaatsen met heel luxueuze wagens, die trouwens voor gewone mensen in nederland niet te betalen zijn, is gewoon een vaststelling , vroeg me trouwens af waar ze dit geld vandaan halen om die dingen te kopen

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: musa ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 11:01

mijn pleegdochter heeft er 3 jaar de high school gedaan ik heb me 3 jaar verbaasd over de luxe van sos
het is echt een op zich staand dorp in Gambia maar wel een rijk en lux dorp
moet wel zeggen de school was erg streng maar we heel goed
op een na de beste high school in kombo 
maar om nou te zeggen ik ga daar hulp goederen naar toe brengen ??
nee echt niet nodig
ga 5 km van het toristen gebeuren weg en deel maar uit
succes

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: nelart ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 19:24



Ja, Arke doet niet meoilijk maar dan moet je Transavia hebben !!

Kijk maar eens bij mijn eerdere postings !

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: annet ()
Datum: 01 november 2008 00:00

Kijk eens op www.thegambianwelfarefund.nl
Groet
Annette

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: nelart ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 10:27



Jan waar staat NGO voor !

Ik weet wel wat je hiermee zeggen wilt want zo denk ik er ook over !

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: imagine ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 13:21

ngo niet gouvernementele organisatie, daar zitten ook alle hulpverlenende organisaties bij
even rechtzetting , ik bedoelde niet specifiek sos, maar in het algemeen hulporganisaties, er zitten er altijd een paar goeie bij ook

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: Mariëtte ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 13:33

Wat ik goed vind van het SOS kinderdorp dat ze geen vrijwilligers aannemen om de boel daar te komen draaien. Ze investeren in lokale mensen die daar komen werken. Dan heb je ook geen probleem dat de vrijwilligers na zoveel tijd weer opstappen. 

Als vrijwilliger die investeert in een land mag je het trouwens goed hebben. 
Waarom niet? Moeten ze ook op een houtje bijten? 

Kleding kun je op de tweedehandsmark voor een habbekrats kopen, hoef je niet mee te nemen. 
Je zit in Nederland aan een max van 20 kg die je vanuit Schiphol mee mag nemen. Vanuit Belgie mag je 40 kg meenemen.

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: Binta ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 18:44

Zelf heb ik gedurende een flink aantal jaren een meisje uit Gambia gesponsord (SOS Kinderdorp) en ik weet dat praktisch 99 % van d ekinderen een sponsor hebben...
Ik ben er mee gestopt omdat de bedragen absurd hoog werden en ook omdat ik ontdekte dat zijzelf zelfs door TWEE personen gesponsord werd...
Daarbij ging ik telkens bij haar op bezoek en werd ze steeds maar ontevredener,ze ging steeds meer en meer vragen.
Ik kon voor dit geld meer doen voor mijn eigen familie....
grtjs,
Binta

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: awa ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 18:44

Als je het van te voren aangeeft bij Arke Fly krijg je korting op je babage, als je meldt dat het voor hulpgoederen is. En ik had laatst weer het geluk dat ik weer 21 kilo extra GRATIS mocht meenemen.

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: Sally ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 19:08

Dat is niet altijd zo hoor, ligt er denk ik aan wie je voor je hebt. Ik had het ook aangegeven, maar ze gaven van tevoren aan dat het alleen kon als je een bewijs van een officiele stichting zou hebben.
Wel kreeg ik toen bij de incheck balie paar kilos gratis erbij en een paar moest ik er betalen.

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: nelart ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 19:29



Mariette

In april 2009 gaan 3 vrijwillgers via mijn Stichting werken en onderzoek doen in het SOS dorp naar de kinderen met een trauma van sextoerisme ! Dus klopt niet helemaal wat je zegt !!


SOS

Ik vroef een tijdje gelden aan onze secretaris in Gambia wat hij van het SO vond en wat ze eigenlijk nu precies deden voor de bevolking !

Helemaal niets zie hij !
Sinds 1994 hebben ze al niets meer voor Gambia gedaan !
Het laatste wat ze deden was na een hevie regenval was er allemaal blubber van d heoing afgekomen en had drikwater bassins verontreingd en mensen dtieven hieraan. Unicef heeft toen nieuwe Bassins geplaatst en dit was het laatste volgens hem.
Hij had er GEEN hoge pet van op !

Triest vind ik dit !
En dan maar dikke autos rijden daar met wit leren bekleding !

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: Mariëtte ()
Datum: 30 oktober 2008 23:50

Hoi Nel: 
dat heb ik altijd begrepen: Dat je er niet als vrijwilliger kunt werken, omdat ze alleen lokale mensen aannemen. Ik had er weleens naar geïnformeerd. 
Om als vrijwilliger in zuid afrika te werken bij aids wezen vroegen/ vragen ze maar liefst 950 euro per maand.... om daar te mogen werken. Daar kwam ik vorig jaar achter. 

Het andere uiterste: dat vrijwilligers het goed hebben dan doel ik eigenlijk op blanke vrijwilligers die daar rondrijden in grote auto's: wie weet hoeveel zieke mensen ze daarin al vervoerd hebben naar een ziekenhuis en ook nog eens de behandeling uit eigen zak betaald hebben. 
Ze moeten natuurlijk niet het geld van de stichting in de witte leren bekleding van hun auto steken, maar als ze zelf die auto gekocht hebben of krijgen... waarom niet?

Re: sos kinderdorp

Gepost door: nelart ()
Datum: 01 november 2008 15:15



Of op: www.sharanie.nl

Ga naar: •DiscussielijstZoekenLog in
Sorry, alleen geregistreerde gebruikers mogen berichten plaatsen in dit forum.

Indians join Slovaks in protesting against UK child snatchers

Indians join Slovaks in protesting against UK child snatchers

Protesters outside the British Embassy in BratislavaPicture: THEDAILY.SK

By Christopher Booker

27/10/2012

The behaviour of our 'child protection' system is a growing international scandalConcerned by my reporting on how our “child protection” system has gone off the rails, one of my readers, David Phipps of Witney, wrote about it to his MP, David Cameron. As Mr Phipps records on his Witterings of Witney blog, the PM replied that he was aware of my articles but that they give “a very misleading picture” of our care system. I may occasionally single out a case where “a wrong decision” was taken, but he wanted to assure his disbelieving constituent that such mistakes are “exceptionally rare”.Among those rather better informed, and far less complacent, about what our social workers and courts get up to than Mr Cameron are a growing number of shocked foreign observers.

Foster care: It’s time to think out of the box

Foster care: It’s time to think out of the box

Being blind followers of the West, even in matters of child care, may lead us down a dark alley, writes Suranya Aiyar

In sharp contrast to Western conventions for reportage of children, the pictures and names of Abhigyan and Aishwarya were freely used in our media in articles about their escapade with foster care in Norway. But that was not necessarily a bad thing for the ill-starred Bhattacharyas.

The images of little Aishwarya driving away from New Delhi airport showing her unmistakeable resemblance to her mother Sagarika, made an eloquent proclamation of where she came from and whom she ought to be with. The footage of the radiant smiles of the mother and grandmother, when they were finally able to meet the children in India were a testament, if any was needed, to their great joy at their return. Watching them, we smiled with them and felt their happiness. Admittedly, some of us did not smile, and rather felt our impatience at the media over-kill. Nevertheless, such public empathy for the family as was generated by the free media access to them was of no small value to the Bhattacharyas. In the situation in which the Bhattacharyas found themselves, cornered by a widely respected and powerful bureaucracy that was deeply invested in justifying its drastic action, the impersonality of faceless and nameless reporting was perhaps the opposite of what they needed. The mother certainly gained something in having out there the images of her holding Aishwarya in her lap and pushing Abhigyan’s hair off his forehead in an everyday mom-like gesture, belying the extreme allegations about her mental and parenting competence.

As with journalistic convention, so with child care: the West doesn’t have all the answers and racism is not its only failing. It was interesting how much public support in India for the Bhattacharyas thinned out when the Norwegian Child Welfare Service (CWS) produced reasons other than their racist evaluation (and it was racist) of Sagarika Bhattacharya and her child rearing practices to justify their actions. It is almost as if the Indian imagination cannot go beyond racism when opposing the West. It is the obverse of the standard Western response to objections from our part of the world to its actions: “these are people of immense pride”.

Why Child Welfare Committees need to be overhauled

Why Child Welfare Committees need to be overhauled


New Delhi:  On an average two babies are abandoned daily in Delhi. If they are found in time they end up in the care of Child Welfare Committees (CWC). Given a new study done by the Delhi Legal Services Authority (DLSA) found that among the issues plaguing CWCs include a lack of infrastructure, poor record maintenance, callous attitude of members and violation of rules; questions are being raised about the quality of care these institutions can provide.
CWCs are quasi judicial bodies responsible for conducting inquiries required to rehabilitate children, monitoring the functioning of children homes and declaring children legally free for adoption. Out of 463 CWCs in the country, seven are located in the national capital and each committee deals with 800 to 1200 cases annually.
The DLSA reports suggests that these committees are not equipped to handle cases of ‘extremely vulnerable children who have to be dealt with great care and sensitivity’.
To begin with, the study notes, CWC members are not trained to make decisions in the best interest of children. No training and orientation has been imparted to the chairperson or members of CWCs as mandated by law.
One of the consequences of lack of training is the callous attitude of Committee members while restoring the child to those who approach them claiming to be parents.
“While restoring child to a family, committee members verify documents in a casual manner and in some cases, the child is handed over to the claimant without checking his or her identity,” the study notes.
To substantiate its observation that CWCs have abdicated their responsibility while returning a child, DLSA cites the case of a baby found in a cradle at Palna and produced before the CWC. The next day, the baby girl was released to a woman named Bhagwati, who claimed to be her maternal grandmother. The release was made without any verification or investigation by the police.
In another instance, where a girl who had eloped voiced fears of going back to her family, the DLSA report notes that the CWC seemed to have sent her back to the family without passing any orders for follow up action to ensure the safety of the girl.
Similarly, no efforts are made in the case of missing children who run away from their homes repeatedly, to find out what the problem is, and if the child is in need of protection. The CWCs are fully empowered to keep children from a troubled home for a short while in a children’s home/ boarding school with a proper care plan, to ensure the safety and welfare of the child.
Not surprised by the findings of DLSA report, child rights experts say that there is a case for the overhaul of CWCs and make their functioning independent from the government.
“These bodies have been reduced to administrative structures. We should make changes in the selection criteria of committee members and insist on their training,” says Bharti Ali, co- director of Delhi based NGO, Haq centre for child rights. Haq’s study of CWCs also highlighted similar anomalies.
Anant Asthana, lawyer, who specialises in child rights, says, “Quality of functioning of CWCs depend on the knowledge, skills, capacity of its members and chairpersons, among several other factors. With a composition which changes every three years, the quality is bound to suffer.”
“We should liberate CWCs from ad hoc decisions, restore their independence from direct government control and put in place a system of training and monitoring, as is the case with lower judiciary,” he added.
The recent spurt of sexual abuse cases in child care institutions is also linked to the poor functioning of CWCs. More than 29,000 children live in 638 child care institution (meant for short and long stays) or children homes registered under the Juvenile Justice Act 2000 (JJ Act), says the data with the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development. According to JJ Act, the inspection committee for such institutions should consist of representatives from the state government, voluntary organizations, medical experts and CWC members.
But the CWCs do not conduct regular visits, citing work pressure, and do not maintain records of the inspections carried out.
“The absence of such regular inspections have resulted in the conditions prevailing in the children homes as was found in Apna Ghar,” said the report, referring to the children’s shelter in Haryana which grabbed national headlines in June this year after inmates complained of sexual abuse.
In several cases, CWCs keep extending the child’s stay in a CCI for months based only on the presentations made by the representatives of that CCI. In case a child is not produced before the CWC on a given date, chances are that the committee would not make a note.
“The CWCs do not maintain proper files and the order sheets (so called) are placed haphazardly so much so that the first orders passed upon the production of the child before the CWC are not traceable in many cases. CWCs have no clue as to the number of children who are to be produced before them on a particular date. Nor do they have any information as to whether or not a child who was to be produced on a specified date has in fact been produced,” observes DLSA.

HAS PRESIDENT JAMMEH SACRIFICED SOS BABY ADOPTED BY THE FIRST LADY AS A RITUAL?

HAS PRESIDENT JAMMEH SACRIFICED SOS BABY ADOPTED BY THE FIRST LADY AS A RITUAL?

HAS PRESIDENT JAMMEH SACRIFICED SOS BABY ADOPTED BY THE FIRST LADY AS A RITUAL?
 
A newly born Gambian baby, who was dumped by her mum immediately after labor, and was “adopted” by Gambia’s First Lady Zeinab Suma Jammeh back in 2000, has disappeared—amid speculations that the dictator might have allegedly sacrificed the girl as a ritual. The baby was being taken care of by a foster parent at the Bakoteh Children’s village, where the First Lady offered to adopt the baby as her parent. At the time, her daughter baby Mariam Jammeh needed a company, and she thought that the best way to keep her child entertained was to become a foster parent.
Zeinab left the State House under the company of  Fatou Jahoumpa Ceesay, Nyimasata Sanneh Bojang, and a handful of her protocol staff to the Children’s village to ask the SOS management to help allow her adopt the abandoned new born baby. Management agreed, and she later showed up with a pregnant goat, bag of rice, cooking oil and Cola-nut to christen the baby.
The SOS staff, including the foster parents at the SOS  threw a party for the child. The baby was named after the President’s wife Zeinab Souma Jammeh. The goat that was brought by Zeinab died, when a heavy storm hit the SOS village, a source said.
Fatou Jahoumpa Ceesay, and Nyimasata Sanneh Bojang played a crucial role towards the baby’s adoption. Nyimasata used to work with the SOS as a Social case worker prior to joining the Jammeh regime. She was very familiar with the SOS.
The First Lady came to pick up the child a month after the naming ceremony. She told the girl’s foster parent that she was going to take her to the State House to keep her daughter accompany. This tells you that Jammeh has no family in the Gambia to interact with his daughter. They had to adopt an abandoned child to keep baby Mariam accompany. There is nothing wrong with Zeinab adopting an abandoned kid, but the circumstances surrounding the child adoption raises a red flag. There was no legal paperwork signed to account for the adopted child.
For eleven solid years, the SOS adopted child is nowhere to be seen around Zeinab’s kids. The baby was last seen by the SOS management when Zeinab, FJC and Nyimasata Sanneh Bojang came to adopt her.
Concerned parties approached the Freedom Newspaper asking for help to locate the adopted SOS girl. The parties concerned said they were present when the First Lady was accompanied by Fatou Jahoumpa Ceesay, and Nyimasata Sanneh Bojang asking the SOS Management for the baby to be adopted by Zeinab.
During our investigations, we interviewed numerous sources within the Jammeh State House. One insider said he was aware of the child adoption. The insider said after adopting the child, the First Lady decided to give the baby to her aunty one Hadija. Hadija raised Zeinab when she was poor child.  She has not been blessed with a child in her lifetime, the insider said.
According to the State House insider, the baby was never hosted at the State House, contrary to Zeinab’s initial impression that she was going to raise her with Mariam. The baby was staying with Hadija at a property within the Greater Banjul Area, the insider tells the Freedom Newspaper. He said Hadija will occasionally bring the baby to the State House to interact with baby Mariam.
“The baby later stopped coming to the State House. I don’t know where she is right now. I don’t know whether she is alive, or has been sacrificed by the President,” the insider said.
“ I do know for a fact that the President worships idols. He has “Jalangs” in Kanilai. One Faye Bojang has been assigned by Jammeh to pour alcohol on the “Jalangs” on every Thursday and Friday. This has been a routine practice. Even whereas the President is away, Faye Bojang must pour alcohol on the Jallangs. The President worships idols,” the source said.
 

10 Reasons To Adopt From Bulgaria

10 Reasons To Adopt From Bulgaria

10/22/2012

Michele L. Jackson, J.D.

During my time in the Bulgarian orphanages and working in Bulgaria, I was able to observe many benefits in the Bulgarian adoption process. While Bulgaria has not seen the popularity of international adoption like Russian adoptions and Ukrainian adoptions, I find that it has numerous benefits that are often overlooked.

Top 10 benefits to adopting from Bulgaria:

France delays debate on gay marriage and adoption, amid mounting opposition

France delays debate on gay
marriage and adoption, amid mounting opposition





PARIS — France is delaying debate on a draft law
authorizing gay marriage, as the government grapples with increasingly vocal
opposition to the idea.


The legalization of same-sex marriages and adoption was one of the most
contentious points in Socialist President Francois Hollande’s election manifesto
earlier this year.













Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault first named Oct. 31 as the date when
government ministers would present the law, insisting there would be no
backtracking.


But his office said Friday that this date has been pushed back to Nov. 7. And
the debate in parliament is now expected to last until January.


On Thursday, France’s Chief Rabbi Gilles Bernheim joined other religious
leaders in opposing the plans, while more than 1,200 French mayors and their
deputies have signed a petition protesting them.


Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Malawi: Law Fails to Protect Children

Malawi: Law Fails to Protect ChildrenBy Charity Chimungu Phiri, 16 October 2012

Blantyre — Patrick Martin, 14, and his brother Mayeso, 15, are safely home for the moment with their mother and other siblings in Kasonya village, Phalombe District in southern Malawi, after they and 12 other children were rescued from being trafficked to neighbouring Mozambique last month by their father.

Every farming season, people from Phalombe District are taken to the southern African country of Mozambique to earn their families enough money to buy a bicycle - which is considered a luxury in a country were 65 percent of its 16 million people live below the poverty line.

The story of these children is one of many familiar occurrences in Malawi at the moment, as government statistics indicate that at least 1.4 million children are involved in child labour and 20 percent of them are being trafficked domestically and internationally for the sex industry and illegal adoption.

But the future safety of these boys remains uncertain, and they may be forced into child labour again, as out of date laws in the country mean that their father will get off with merely a slap on the wrist for his crime. The country has no human trafficking law, and while there is a provision against child trafficking in Section 79 of the Child Care Protection and Justice Act, it is not being correctly implemented.

Their father, James Martin, 31, will be released from Mulanje prison after a mere 18 months. He, together with James Banda, 23; Daniel Thumpwa, 21; and Dickson Kambewa, 37, was charged for engaging children under the age of 18 in child labour.

The were charged under the Employment Act, and not on child trafficking according to Section 79 of the Child Care Protection and Justice Act.

The Child Care Protection and Justice Act, which became a law in December 2011, stipulates that a trafficker should serve a maximum sentence of life imprisonment when they are caught trafficking children under the age of 16.

Maxwell Matewere, the executive director of the non-governmental organisation Eye of the Child, which prioritises the fight against child trafficking, told IPS that the country's laws are making it difficult for organisations and the police to work to their fullest in the fight against the practice.

"The problem now is that magistrates are not using the Child Care and Protection Justice Act to pass sentences mainly because it is not mandatory and also depends on mitigating factors such as at what level of engagement was a child rescued and his age.

"Furthermore, in Malawi we do not have a law on human trafficking so when offenders are caught by the police and charged with human trafficking the charge is changed in court because there is no such law," he said.

"A Zambian man who was arrested for trafficking children from Dedza (in Malawi's Central Region) to work in maize farms in Zambia, was released after he paid a fine," he said.

Matewere added that the current Child Protection and Justice Act is quite limited in a number of ways.

"The law only provides for the definition of child trafficking as an offence punishable by life imprisonment; however, it does not give any mechanism as to how victims could be identified and cared for. It also is silent on other pressing factors like the definition of recruitment, and on what would happen to an NGO (for example an orphanage that engages in illegal adoption) or a bus company that is involved in transferring of children," he said.

Matewere said unless the government has the political will to deal with the root factors of the problem, which he identifies as poverty, unemployment, lack of education and lack of national identification, more children will continue to be trafficked.

Deputy national police spokesman Kelvin Maigwa told IPS that between January and August this year, 43 cases of child trafficking were reported, of which the numbers were equal between male and female children.

"The reason why these children are being taken away from their homes is because their masters are looking for cheap labour so they get the children to work in tea and tobacco estates and pay them peanuts because they know they can't complain. The girls are mainly brought to work in prostitution in bars and taverns where they are used to woo customers and sometimes to cut beer packets, they are also employed in domestic work as nannies or housekeepers in cities and towns," he said.

Herbert Bimphi, chairman of the parliamentary social welfare committee and Democratic Progressive Party member of parliament for Ntchisi North, told IPS that in the absence of a law on human trafficking the courts will continue passing sentences that are not in line with what is actually happening.

"But the information that I have is that the Law Commission has drafted the Trafficking Persons' Bill and that now it is at the Ministry of Justice and Home Affairs. The minister responsible will then bring it to the House so that we can scrutinise it then call on other experts to look at it again if it is well-written, then we will debate on it and then formally adopt it," he said.

Minister of Gender and Child Welfare Anita Kalinde told IPS that the Trafficking Persons Bill is being finalised, but that there are other laws on protection of children, which have adequate provisions.

"What needs to be done however is the popularisation of the laws through community education of the legal provisions; and translating of the Act into local languages so that people can demand their rights," she said.

Kalinde did acknowledge, however, that the sentences being passed on offenders are not satisfactory "considering the fact that the trafficked child's future has been ruined. I would have preferred stiffer penalties."

She further said the government has put in place several mechanisms to help reduce poverty among families who are at risk of engaging in trafficking and child labour.

Kalinde singled out the agriculture subsidy, where the poorest families buy farm inputs at reduced prices, thereby enabling them to produce enough for their families.

However, Maigwa told IPS that the country's laws could be luring the offenders to commit the crime again.

"In general, some of our laws are outdated and weak...they are not in line with the current situation. At the time when they were being formulated they were strong but now for example if you ask an offender to pay a K200 fine (equivalent to a dollar) for assaulting someone for example, no one can fail to do that so they go and offend again."

Phalombe District police spokesman Augustus Nkhwazi told IPS that traffickers are illegally crossing into Mozambique easily because no Malawian police officers are stationed at the border post.

"When these people are entering that country they are perceived to be the children's parents or guardians because people from the two countries have established trade relationships as well as intermarriages. As such there is movement on these borders every day," said Nkhwazi.

Nkhwazi further said the practice is more common now in his district due to poverty and lack of enough farmland and also the willingness by parents to engage in the practice.

Maigwa is however optimistic that the times are changing with the engagement of the Police Force's Child Protection Officer in every district over five years ago.

"Each police station has a Community Policing Unit where we have the Child Protection Officer who basically engages the masses in civic education, teaching them on the tricks that child traffickers may use when they come to their homes, such as a promise of a better paying job or drastic economic changes for the children...so we believe people are becoming more knowledgeable of this crime than before," he said.

http://allafrica.com/stories/201210161406.html