Home  

Dark side of inter-racial adoption surfaces with arrivals of grown-up adoptees

10-10-2012 17:53
Dark side of inter-racial adoption surfaces with arrivals of grown-up adoptees

Washington State Senator Paull Shin, French digital economy minister Fleur Pellerin and French Senator Jean-Vincent Place. They all have something in common.

All three are Korean adoptees who have become successes in their adopted countries.

Behind the success stories of those people, however, are others who suffer emotional distress after being adopted by foreign parents.

Adoptees' rights activists say many of the children sent for inter-racial adoption suffer racial and other social discrimination, constantly longing for their biological parents and homeland.

In the United States, a country where adoptees must undergo a separate procedure to obtain citizenship, more than a few adoptees never become naturalized, partly due to indifference from their adoptive parents.

According to South Korea's health and welfare ministry and an activist group devoted to Korean adoptees' human rights, there are 23,000 Korean adoptees in the U.S. whose citizenship status the groups do not know.

The figure represents about 20 percent of some 110,000 adoptees sent to America over the past 60 years since the 1950-53 Korean War.

A majority of those 23,000, in fact, appear to have obtained U.S. nationality but the true figure remains unknown due to local adoption agencies' poor management of post-adoption information.

"Most of the unconfirmed cases may be caused by the agencies' failure to inform the government of information on adoptees' acquisition of U.S. nationality," said Rev. Kim Do-hyun of the activist group KoRoot. "But several thousand of them are still believed to be living without any nationality."

In recent years, a sizable number of adoptees have been deported to Korea after being convicted of criminal charges while living overseas without becoming citizens of the country in which they live.

"As far as I know, there are more than 100,000 adoptees who voluntarily returned or were deported to South Korea while living without nationality," Kim said. "But the actual number may be larger than this when the number of people who live in South Korea without telling others they were deported, for fear of possible disadvantages, is counted."

The returnees are often unwelcome in Korean society, also.

Except for those with professional skills or fluency in the Korean language, most face language and cultural barriers.

Some return to locate their biological parents and find their true Korean identity only to discover that all the personal information they thought they knew about themselves was fabricated to facilitate their adoption.

Michael Kang, 36, was a victim of such so-called "child laundering."

The young man, whose original Korean name is Kang Yong-mun, returned to South Korea in 2006, nearly 23 years after being sent for adoption to the U.S.

After his return, Kang discovered he has two different family registries, including the original with the names of his actual Korean family members. The second family registry, forged by a local agency that matched children with families wanting to adopt, described him as an orphan although his parents were alive, in order to bypass the U.S. adoption rule that only orphans can be adopted without parental approval.

Kang was one of the lucky ones, as he eventually located and met his Korean parents, back here in South Korea.

"After comparing two registries -- one from my biological father and the other discovered by my friend -- I came to know that the documents used for (my) adoption were fabricated," Kang said. "I felt that the Korean adoption system is corrupt and I was abandoned," he said, recalling that discovery with anger.

Kang said his first adoption failed due to ill-treatment by his adoptive parents and he underwent repeated adoptions and dissolutions.
"It was like I had lived someone else's life," he said.

Child laundering was so common among local adoption agencies in the past that South Korea became notorious as one of the world's largest exporters of "orphans." A new law that came into effect in August of this year requires the birth certificate of the child be included in the documents required for any adoption.

The total number of Korean-born children adopted to foreign parents reached 164,000 as of this year. Holt Children's Services Inc., a Seoul-based adoption agency, said the number of children available for adoption has halved since the law went into effect.

Adoption agencies argue they had no other way but to fabricate facts and circumstances about the children they sought to place in order to provide them with new homes, because in many cases the children were living in orphanages and the agencies could not meet the biological parents to obtain consent.

Kang is far from the only victim of such child laundering. Jane Jeong Trenka, 40, was represented as an orphan by a local adoption agency although her mother and twin sister were alive. She was adopted by an American couple six months after her birth.

Personal records of almost all adoptees were fabricated in this way, Jeong said. After seeing fabricated documents on them while growing up, children are shocked to know that they were abandoned by their biological parents, she said, adding this constitutes violence against humans.

She called for a government role in scrutinizing adoption agencies and ensuring they provide correct personal information on adoptees.

Rev. Kim said adoption had long been considered a good deed of finding new homes for lonely children but that the unnerving truth has surfaced with the return of adult adoptees to the country.

"The nation should make efforts to create an environment in which unmarried mothers are encouraged to raise their own children rather than encouraging them to choose adoption, which separates children from their birth parents," Kim said. (Yonhap)

Argos - statement Wereldkinderen

Argos
9 oktober 2012

In het radioprogramma Argos werd gesproken over het rapport Fruits of Ethiopia uit 2009. Wereldkinderen zou de uitkomsten van dit rapport onder de pet hebben gehouden en individuele ouders niet hebben geïnformeerd. Dat is pertinent onjuist.

Naar aanleiding van aanhoudende signalen uit Ethiopië over de betrouwbaarheid van de procedures heeft Wereldkinderen haar verantwoordelijkheid genomen en onderzoek gedaan naar de achtergronden van negentien willekeurige dossiers. Dat heeft geresulteerd in het rapport Fruits of Ethiopia. In sommige gevallen bleek de achtergrondinformatie van kinderen anders dan in het dossier vermeld. Om die reden is in 2009 besloten alle procedures in Ethiopië stil te leggen. Alle betrokken adoptieouders zijn daarover geïnformeerd.

Tegelijkertijd is Wereldkinderen gestart met het verifiëren van de resultaten omdat aan sommige resultaten uit het rapport werd getwijfeld. Adoptiegezinnen van onderzochte dossiers waar afwijkende achtergrondinformatie bevestigd kon worden zijn persoonlijk geïnformeerd. Van een viertal dossiers hebben we de gegevens uit het rapport niet kunnen verifiëren.

Het rapport is naar het Ministerie van Veiligheid & Justitie gestuurd en Wereldkinderen heeft het Ministerie vanaf het begin volledig geïnformeerd over de stappen die zijn gezet. Naar aanleiding van dit rapport is in november 2009 een uitgebreid werkbezoek afgelegd aan Ethiopië waarbij ook het Ministerie vertegenwoordigd was. Ethiopië heeft daarop besloten de procedures op een aantal vitale punten aan te scherpen. De uitkomst van dit werkbezoek heeft aan de basis gelegen van een uitgebreide reactie van de Minister van Justitie aan de kamer, gedateerd 16 februari 2010. Hij concludeerde daarin dat er geen reden was om de bestaande adoptierelatie met Ethiopië te heroverwegen.

De belangrijkste conclusies uit het rapport heeft Wereldkinderen openbaar gemaakt op haar website en via de media. Het volledige rapport bevat privacygevoelige informatie. Informatie over individuele families en kinderen was en is eenvoudig te herleiden. Om die reden en omdat er onjuistheden in het rapport stonden, heeft Wereldkinderen het volledige rapport niet openbaar gemaakt. De onderzoeker heeft, tegen gemaakte afspraken in, gemeend dit wel te moeten doen op een buitenlandse site. Wereldkinderen heeft de onderzoeker gesommeerd dit te staken in het belang van de privacy van individuele kinderen en hun ouders.

Wereldkinderen heeft altijd het voortouw genomen in kwaliteitsverbetering ten aanzien van adoptieprocedures of haar projecten in de landen van herkomst. Het belang en de rechten van het individuele kind zijn de uitgangspunten. Wereldkinderen hoopt binnenkort de adoptieprocedure in Ethiopië weer te kunnen starten. We zijn blij dat wij voor kinderen die, zoals in het voorbeeld van Argos door hun moeder zonder enige zorg op straat worden achtergelaten, gezinnen in Nederland hebben die hen een liefdevol thuis willen bieden. De kwaliteit van de procedures staat voorop en daar zal door Wereldkinderen strikt op worden toegezien.

The appalling situation of Romania’s institutionalized children: From Ceausescu to today

The appalling situation of Romania’s institutionalized children: From Ceausescu to today
By Diana Toma
23 May 2012
In 1990 the feature pages of US and European newspapers and magazines were full of photos depicting the appalling conditions prevailing for orphaned and disabled children in Romania. The many articles devoted to this theme denounced the conditions in children’s homes in the country and predicted, or at least hoped for, improvements with the introduction of a free-market system.
Recent figures reveal that, in the wake of the latest economic crisis, the slight improvements in care of children, often carried out by private charitable agencies during recent years, are being reversed.
In Romania, cases of the inhumane treatment of children left abandoned in hospitals or simply thrown in the trash by their own parents are becoming increasingly frequent. The latest UNICEF study places Romania first among European countries regarding the abandonment of children. The number of children abandoned by their parents grew last year. Statistics show that almost 950 children were abandoned in maternity hospitals, an increase of 180 compared to 2010. Poverty, with all that comes with it—unemployment, decline in real incomes, decrease in purchasing power, lack of adequate housing, etc.—is a major cause of child desertion in the country.

Are you researching Serbian adoption - IFS

Saturday, October 6, 2012





Are you researching Serbian
adoption?





In the last six weeks I have
received several emails about four Serbian children who have been listed on the
Rainbow Kids
website.
Here's one listing in particular.


Although it doesn't say "Serbia" on it, if
you contact the agency International Family Services they will tell you the child is
in Serbia.

Photo listings of Serbia's waiting children is a violation of
Serbian law. It doesn't matter if you or I agree with the law, the fact is it's
not allowed.

These children are said to be "healthy", without any
identified special needs, with birth dates putting them at *just* over 12 months
old.  If you inquire about the children you'll be told they have all been
matched with families.  (healthy infants go fast, you know!)

You are
welcome to verify what I'm about to tell you by contacting the Serbian ministry
directly. Serbia ONLY allows children with special needs to be adopted
internationally.

What you will also get is IFS's information on their
country programs and fees. I think you will find this information quite
interesting. I know the Serbian Ministry of Labor and Social Policy adoption
unit along with officials at the US Embassy in Belgrade will find it interesting
as well.

Here is IFS's description of their program. I will break it into
chunks and insert my comments.



"SERBIA ADOPTION
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

International Family
Services is excited to offer an international adoption program through the
country of
Serbia
.

One trip
is required, for approximately 16 days (in Belgrade), approximately 4-6
months after your completed paperwork is in Serbia. Adoptions through this
program are expected to be less costly than an adoption through Russia. The
staff in Serbia speak English and will be with you to help you through the
process."
This is very interesting. When doing a
Serbian adoption, through the Ministry of Labor and Social policy as you're
supposed to be, most families travel within a matter of WEEKS after their
paperwork is submitted in Serbia. With Asher I traveled within two weeks. Axel
was almost a month but only because that's the date we CHOSE.


"Un-related children can be adopted at the same
time."
This is absolutely untrue. Two
unrelated children cannot be adopted from Serbia at the same time. Serbia only
allows the adoption of one child at a time except in the case of sibling
groups.

This is one of my favorite parts, read it very carefully and see
if you can find the discrepancies. Oh wait, I'll highlight them for
you!:



At this time the IFS/partner Serbia adoption program is
going to be available to healthy, married couples only, but could change later.
Both parents go to meet the child but only one needs to stay for 3 weeks, while
the other can return home. The
parents must be at least 18 years older than the child, but no more than 45
years older than the adopted child.
Adoptive parents
must be 25-45 years old.
Ok wait a minute. The
parents must be at least 18 years older than the child, but the parents must
also be at least 25 years old. Let me think: 25 - 18  = 7. That would mean the
youngest child you could get out of Serbia is 7 years old???? How can that BE
when they've just listed four 12 month old children???????

Ok, here is
more, most of which is copied directly from the US State Department website:

Prospective adoptive parents will
be disqualified from adopting if they have been diagnosed with mental disorders
or infectious diseases. Adoptive parents with other serious health conditions
must demonstrate to the Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Policy their
ability to raise the child. In most cases, Serbia will allow Americans to adopt only children with
physical or mental disabilities that are most effectively treated in the United
States. Children between the ages of two months and 18 years are eligible for
adoption. Please note that a child must be under the age of 16 in order to
qualify for a U.S. immigrant visa.

Did
you just read what I read???? IFS is claiming they have healthy children they're
willing to help you adopt, and yet in their own email they said Serbia will only
allow parents to adopt children who have physical or mental disabilities who are
better able to get help in the U.S. The only 'healthy' children coming out are
siblings to those already begin adopted who have special needs.
And more

A foreign citizen may adopt a child in Serbia only after
the child has been registered for adoption for at least one year and no domestic
adopters have been found.
If prospective adoptive parents have
located a child prior to their arrival in Serbia, the whole process may be
finished within four weeks.
Ok, let me explain this
to you. A child must be on the domestic registry for one full year before they
are able to able to be added to the international registry and must have been
rejected by at least three domestic (Serbian) families before they can be added
to the international registry. Do the math...you're not going to get a "healthy"
12 or 14 month old child out of the country legally.


For all
the information they copied directly from the Department of State website, they
forgot to include this (which I have taken directly from the Department of State
website!)


Currently there are no adoption agencies operating
in Serbia.  Prospective adoptive parents must work directly with the Ministry of
Labor, Employment and Social Policy
In a recent
email from the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy I was told there is
only one agency who has made an attempt to get approval to conduct adoptions

in Serbia but they have not yet moved forward to conduct any adoptions.
International Family Services was not on this list of ONE.

Now
lets talk about money, shall we? I find this to be quite
interesting.

Here is what I paid during Axel's adoption in December 2010
with the corrupt facilitator who is now facing an upcoming trial for several
counts of criminal activity:

Hometudy App. Fee: $150
Background check:
$210
Fingerprints: $50
Birth certificates: $150
USCIS fingerprints:
$830
Homestudy: $2400
Passport: $123
Apostille: $50
Reece's Rainbow
commitment fee: $210
About A Child agency Fee: $2000
FEDex:
$100
Translation Fee: $900
Airfare: $1700
Ticket Change Fee:
$463
Facilitation Fee: $6500
Hotel: $1028
Visa/passport:
$500
Medical: $100
Food/expenses: $1000
Total: $18,529

Exactly one year later,
December 2011, the corrupt facilitator no longer in the picture, I completed
Asher's adoption. This was working directly with the Serbian ministry as people
were supposed to have been doing (this adoption I needed only to update my home
study not start from scratch).

Homestudy update: $1900
Airfare TO:
$500
Translation: $750
Medical: $100
Birth certificate:
$60
Passport: $100
Visa: $404
USCIS: $720
Airfare Home: (1 adult, 1
child) $1000
Lodging (25 euro/night x 20 nights): $670
Transportation and
daily per diem (15 euro/day x 20 days) $600
Food/Misc: $400
Total:
$7,194


Now, let me show you the fees that International Family
Services has quoted for their Serbian adoption program:










The adoption fees
for each child are:

$4,950 Agency
fee

$22,000 Foreign Fee
paid out as follows:

$10,000 Due at time of match
with a child
$7,000 Dossier
Fee
Due With Completed
Dossier (without I 171H)
Can
retain $1,000 of this fee to carry with you to Serbia
$5,000Due when travel date
is
scheduled

Did you add that up??? 



$26,950
This does not include your
homestudy, USCIS or other expenses required to become paper ready to
adopt.


So add in the fees according to where you
live. Home studies are more expensive is some parts of the country that others.
USCIS has recently been reduced. Also add your airfare and travel expenses. The
actual cost is significantly more than $26,950.



As I have always said, please feel free to
contact me privately and I will give you the contact information for the Serbian
ministry, where you can always verify whatever I have said and ask your own
questions. Although I usually respond to people right away, please know that
sometimes emails coming off this site sometimes go to my spam mailbox. I try to
scan it at least once a week so but don't always catch them.




3 comments:
















  1. This is a good post, but your math is
    wrong. They are breaking out the $22,000 by explaining when each part is due. So
    it's really $22,000 + $4950 (from how I am reading it) which still seems
    incredibly high. Agencies like About a Child advertise a Serbia program too. I
    can't find their fees readily on their site, so I have no clue, but hopefully
    they are more competitive than this! It doesn't surprise me that people
    advertise children with SN as without them...but it's definitely not
    ethical!

    ReplyDelete







  2. The general message is well taken. Just 2
    comments on the math:

    1. If a parent is at least 25 years old and at
    least 18 years older than the child, that does not imply a minimum child's age
    of 7.
    (x>25) - (y>18) could be anything at all. For example, if
    x=26,y=26, then x-y = 0. Or, if x=40, y=22, then x-y=18

    2. In the
    breakdown of IFS's fees, you counted the $22K twice. They list $4950 agency fee
    and $22K country fees, and then break down the $22K. That is an explanation, not
    additional fees! So the total is only (!) $26,950. Still outrageously more than
    what the actual costs are.

    Sorry to be pedantic, but I am a math
    teacher....

    You don't have to print this, but I do suggest you update the
    post to avoid damaging your credibility.

    ReplyDelete







  3. Thank you both for correcting my math.
    You're right, I had read the statement of fees incorrectly, which I have
    corrected. Jennifer, my first adoption was through About A Child. I paid them
    $2000. It was a 100% unnecessary $2000 that was literally wasted. I prepared my
    own dossier (with the exception of the homestudy, the dossier took me only days
    to put together) and sent everything myself. I emailed directly with the
    facilitator. I kept asking AAC what that $2000 was for and was told "a receipt
    when you're done." I'll leave it at that. It is not necessary to use an adoption
    agency to adopt from Serbia. You need to use a licensed agency to do your
    homestudy and that's it.

Toute L'Histoire: Les Mazarin de l'Elysée

Toute L'Histoire:  Les Mazarin de l'Elysée

La chaîne Toute L'Histoire propose ce soir un reportage très vivant sur les éminences grises que sont les conseillers spéciaux de l'Élysée

Tags :

Par Charles Jaigu lefigaro.fr/ mise en ligne Bertrand Guyard Publié le 09/06/2011 à 10:50

De Combret: Legea adop?iilor din România nu respect? conven?iile

- Civil Society in Mass Media -


BCN Chapters - Netherlands

BCN Chapters

Over the last few years, the Better Care Network has observed a growing
global need and interest for regional and country-level networking, workshops
and capacity development trainings, best practice forums, and development
platforms for information exchange. The development of regional and
country-level initiatives will help ensure that advocacy, policy, and program
development around alternative care is culturally relevant and viable within
each national and local context. In response, BCN is taking a more active
convening role around promotion of country chapters and regional
initiatives.

Continue to watch this space for more information!

BCN Netherlands Chapter

The first national chapter of the Better Care Network was launched in the
Netherlands in November 2007. BCN Netherlands (BCNN) was formed by international
nongovernmental organizations and donors in the Netherlands with the aim of
raising awareness about appropriate forms of alternative care among the Dutch
groups and organizations. The chapter is coordinated by a part-time coordinator,
Ms. Bep van Sloten, who can be reached at info@bettercarenetwork.nl. To learn
more about BCNN, click here visit their website—which is in Dutch.

The accreditation of foreign organizations for adoption Kyrgyzstan citizens

The accreditation of foreign organizations for adoption Kyrgyzstan citizens
canceled in the republic

26/07-2012 08:56, Bishkek –
24.kg news agency

The accreditation of foreign organizations for adoption Kyrgyzstan citizens
was canceled in the republic. The Ministry of Social Development informs.

Reportedly, the order for cancellation of previous decisions on the
accreditation of foreign organizations for Kyrgyzstan children adoption was
canceled. According to officials, the decision was taken “in order to eliminate
violations and, in response to the protest of the Prosecutor General”.

The order states: to terminate the force of accreditation certificates for
international adoption of children without parental care of the following
foreign organizations: