International views on fraudulent adoptions, how do we respond to this?
In May of this year, an additional hearing was held on intercountry adoption from Ethiopia in the Commission for Welfare, Public Health and Family of the Flemish Parliament. This hearing came after the testimony of Thereza De Wannemaeker who questioned her adoption from Ethiopia in 2009. Various testimonies from Ethiopian adoptive children and their parents followed, after which Flemish Parliament member Lorin Parys (N-VA) requested an additional hearing in the Flemish Parliament to hear the people involved.
During the hearing, then Flemish Minister for Welfare, Jo Vandeurzen (CD&V), promised to set up an expert panel to conduct in-depth research into past adoptions and to formulate policy recommendations. The former Flemish Government assembled this panel in July. Recently Christof Bex and Miranda N. Aerts, both adopted and familiar with the theme, were added to the panel. This happened after 23 adopters in an open letter to the current Flemish Minister for Welfare, Wouter Beke (CD&V), had criticized the fact that none of the adopted persons co-led the investigation. Soon the panel will meet for the first time to define the content and to determine a concrete work approach.
Unfortunately, malpractice within adoption remains a reality, despite the efforts being made worldwide to prevent it. In March 2016, ISS1 published "Responding to Illegal Adoptions: a professional handbook". This international publication was the first attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of possible remedial and prevention measures. Stakeholders and experts from various countries participated in the handbook and highlighted action points from a legal, psychosocial, social and political framework. In summary, at the end of the handbook, David M Smolin² formulated four perspectives and four recommendations that we present below.
Four perspectives for looking at adoption fraud