Home  

18-mth-old kidnapped & sold for Rs 50,000, rescued

Parents of Missing Children Arrested for Prostitution

Parents of Missing Children Arrested for Prostitution
By staff reporter Zhao Hejuan and Shangguan Jiaoming 06.28.2011 19:50

Yang Libing and Zhou Yinghe have been arrested on charges of prostitution by local authorities

(Beijing) – Yang Libing and Zhou Yinghe, two leading petitioners from a child-trafficking case in Hunan Province, were arrested on June 22 for prostitution, witnesses said.

The two will be under police custody for 15 days as part of the standard penalty for prostitution, according to local authorities.

At the time of their arrest, Yang and Zhou were with a group of parents that were also seeking to petition a child-trafficking case in Shaoyang, Hunan Province.

Yang's younger brother told Caixin that his brother was being framed. "Shaoyang police have not been prosecuting prostitution cases recently. How could my brother be arrested for that reason? Someone wants to restrict his activities," he said.

An investigative report by Caixin in May detailed a child-trafficking system run by local family planning officials. Yang's daughter was abducted by authorities in 2005 after they were unable to pay a 6,000 yuan fine, based on fabricated regulations by local family planning authorities.

Hunan provincial government already sent a team to investigate the child-trafficking case following Caixin report and the investigation result is yet to be released.

 

Romania: allo stadio 40.000 bambini abbandonati

<<indietro

Romania: allo stadio 40.000 bambini abbandonati

Migliaia di bambini abbandonati entrano uno ad uno nello stadio, l’ultimo però non trova posto. Sullo sfondo, nel frattempo, un contatore rivela il numero dei bambini presenti, più di 40.000. Poi, il messaggio finale, un appello fatto dalla voce di un bambino: “Voglio anch’io i miei genitori”.

E’ questo lo spot che da alcuni giorni viene trasmesso dall’emittente nazionale rumena ProTV, che ha avviato una vera e propria campagna di sensibilizzazione per attirare l’attenzione sul fenomeno estremamente grave dell’abbandono infantile e sulla difficile legislazione che non facilita e non incoraggia l’adozione dei bambini abbandonati. 

Lo spot televisivo in onda in questi giorni ha colpito per la sua forza e per come descrive in modo efficace un problema, quello dell’abbandono, che da anni affligge la Romania. Ogni 6 ore, un bambino è abbandonato, ogni anno vengono abbandonati almeno 1.300 minori e solo la metà di questi trova una famiglia, il resto è costretto a vivere in orfanotrofi.

La campagna avviata ha suscitato forti reazioni tra gli spettatori di Pro Tv, i quali non sono rimasti indifferenti al dramma dei circa 40.000 bambini abbandonati del paese ed hanno firmato su www.stirileprotv.ro la petizione con la quale chiedono una legge corretta ed efficiente delle adozioni in Romania.

Nella petizione viene inoltre specificato e sostenuto il fatto che un bambino, appena abbandonato dai genitori, debba avere la possibilità di essere accolto da quelli che vogliono e possono farlo, indifferentemente dal fatto se siano cittadini rumeni o stranieri.

Tra gli obiettivi anche sensibilizzare le autorità per poter avere una semplificazione della procedura adottiva, per poter togliere i bambini dai centri di accoglienza, per poter creare dei Tribunali per i Minorenni in tutti i judet (regioni) della Romania, per rivalutare le adozioni internazionali, portando all’attenzione pubblica i modelli promossi da altri paesi che danno bambini in adozione internazionale.

Condividi su:

L'adoption internationale : une priorité qu'on veut nous imposer


 
     
  L'adoption internationale : une priorité qu'on veut nous imposer


Haïti: Cet article est dédié à tous les parents haïtiens qui jusqu'à ce jour gardent l'espoir de retrouver leurs enfants séparés d'eux à la suite du tremblement de terre du 12 janvier 2010.
Quelques jours après le tremblement de terre de 2010, un journaliste étranger écrivait : l'adoption internationale n'est pas une aide humanitaire. Suite au tremblement de terre, en effet, l'adoption internationale a dominé l'actualité internationale ; aujourd'hui encore elle semble être le thème central de ceux-là qui prétendent oeuvrer pour la protection et le bien-être des enfants.

"Adoption internationale", un thème prioritaire également pour de nombreux pays « amis ». Au cours de la visite éclair en Haïti d'Alain Juppé, le ministre français des Affaires étrangères, pour assister à l'investiture du président Michel Martelly, le ministre français a pris le temps de visiter un orphelinat et la Fondation Solidarité Internationale, engagée dans l'adoption internationale. De plus, selon des sources autorisées, le ministre Juppé aurait soulevé la question de l'adoption internationale lors de son entretien privé avec le président Martelly (qui a dû peut-être paraître fort surpris du choix d'un tel sujet, compte tenu des grands problèmes auxquels sont confrontées actuellement les familles haïtiennes). 

Il faut donc se demander pourquoi ce focus sur l'adoption internationale, alors que selon l'UNICEF « 1,2 millions d'enfants étaient déjà considérés comme étant extrêmement vulnérables avant le tremblement de terre. Un an plus tard, les enfants d'Haïti sont encore au bord du précipice » ( voir « Un an après - Des secours à la reconstruction : un long parcours », Janvier 2011 UNICEF Haïti).

Pour répondre à cette question, il faut remonter à 2010. Le 20 Janvier 2010, l'ex-Premier ministre Bellerive, sur la demande de certaines organisations de droits humains, adopte une mesure d'urgence selon laquelle le Premier ministre est le seul habilité à autoriser le départ d'enfants haïtiens du territoire national et que dans ces cas, il doire s'agir d'enfants pour lesquels le processus d'adoption avait été déjà engagé et approuvé, ce, de concert avec les ambassades concernées. Cette mesure, conforme aux principes de droits humains, visait à assurer que la priorité dans cette situation de catastrophes soit donnée aux efforts visant la réunification des enfants avec leurs parents ou les membres de leur famille, à éviter toutes tentatives prématurées ou irrégulières de sortir un enfant de son pays. Malgré cette mesure, des enfants haïtiens ont continué à sortir du pays au vu et au su de tous. Pourtant, bien que foulée aux pieds dès les premiers jours, cette mesure gêne.

Nombreux sont ceux (étrangers pour la plupart) qui ne veulent que rouvrir l'adoption internationale avec tout ce qu'elle comporte d'illégalité, c'est-à-dire, la traite d'enfants, la vente d'enfants, le trafic d'organes, la prostitution infantile, la pédophilie, etc. Et pour cela, les pressions et les pièges « diplomatiques » s'intensifient, particulièrement à la veille de la tournée du président Martelly en Europe à la fin du mois de juin.

L'enfant a le droit de grandir dans un milieu familial et l'Etat a pour obligation de donner une famille permanente à l'enfant pour lequel une famille appropriée ne peut être trouvée dans son pays d'origine. Cependant, l'adoption internationale telle que pratiquée en Haïti n'est pas toujours un moyen visant à assurer à l'enfant dans une situation de vulnérabilité un environnement familial au contraire, l'adoption internationale, et plus souvent qu'on ne le suppose, est un mécanisme utilisé par beaucoup pour s'enrichir sans aucune considération pour la situation de l'enfant ou pour exercer toutes sortes de violence sur l'enfant. Les anecdotes relatives à la vente d'enfants, vente d'organes, aux primes d'assurances sont nombreuses. Vrai ou faux ! Comme dit le proverbe il n'y a pas de fumée sans feu.

D'un côté, il y a les crèches. Selon l'UNICEF des 700 centres d'enfants actuellement répertoriés, seulement 300 sont accrédités. Les crèches sont des institutions hébergeant des enfants en bas âge et dont le seul but est de les donner en adoption internationale. Généralement ces crèches sont liées à des organismes étrangers d'adoption, se chargent de chercher des enfants et des parents adoptifs étrangers, le plus souvent sans autre considération que monétaire. Il s'agit là d'un commerce extrêmement lucratif. 80 à 90% sont des adoptions individuelles, c'est-à-dire une relation directe entre les propriétaires de crèches et les parents adoptifs étrangers. En plus des rémunérations (et mensualités) payées par les parents adoptifs, les crèches recevaient des subventions via des ONGs et ONGIs (certaines d'entre elles allant jusqu'à prendre en charge des mères adolescentes). 

D'un autre côté, les orphelinats, ou des milliers d'enfants-vivent des situations abusives. Selon des estimations, près de 50 000 enfants sont placés en institutions; de ce nombre, à peu près 20 000 sont orphelins de père ou de mère ; les autres n'y sont qu'en raison de pauvreté. Suite au séisme de 2010, les orphelinats sont devenus l'une des activités les plus lucratives après les ONGs nationales et internationales.
Les illégalités dans les procédures d'adoption sont pourtant connues de tous. Il s'agit de véritables réseaux criminels dédiés à la traite d'enfants et à des adoptions irrégulières. Ces réseaux, opérant à travers les crèches et les orphelinats, s'approvisionnent en enfants en utilisant souvent la menace, la fraude ou le mensonge, convainquant ainsi les parents biologiques à donner leurs enfants en adoption. Ces réseaux, experts dans la fabrication de faux documents, de fausses mères, de déclarations d'abandon ou de consentement frauduleux, collaborent également avec des avocats et des juges de paix.

A la racine de ces réseaux se trouvent les responsables (ou du moins) des propriétaires de crèches et d'orphelinats vivant de ce commerce et opérant le plus souvent avec la complicité de certains fonctionnaires de l'IBESR. 

Plus de 2 400 enfants ont laissé Haïti depuis le tremblement de terre (plus du double du nombre d'adoption autorisée en 2009). Ce chiffre (bien que partiel) en lui-même constitue la preuve de l'illégalité de ces procédures d'adoption. Des billets gratuits ont été offerts à travers le net à ceux-là qui accepteraient de se rendre en Haïti pour ramener des enfants ; comme on ramène des « patates ».  Continuer >
 
     
Le Nouvelliste en Haiti - Nouvelles d'Haiti: actualités politique, nationale, économique, société, culture, sport. Haitian news: Politics, economy, society, culture and entertainment, sports.
Le Nouvelliste en Haiti - Nouvelles d'Haiti: actualités politique, nationale, économique, société, culture, sport. Haitian news: Politics, economy, society, culture and entertainment, sports.
Le Nouvelliste en Haiti - Nouvelles d'Haiti: actualités politique, nationale, économique, société, culture, sport. Haitian news: Politics, economy, society, culture and entertainment, sports. Le Nouvelliste en Haiti - Nouvelles d'Haiti: actualités politique, nationale, économique, société, culture, sport. Haitian news: Politics, economy, society, culture and entertainment, sports. Le Nouvelliste en Haiti - Nouvelles d'Haiti: actualités politique, nationale, économique, société, culture, sport. Haitian news: Politics, economy, society, culture and entertainment, sports.
  Comment avec des institutions jusqu'à ce jour affaiblies par la catastrophe de janvier 2010 (des ministères, les tribunaux, les services d'Etat civil) a-t-on pu garantir la légalité de ces procédures, s'assurer de l'identité des enfants et de leur adoptabilité, vérifier le consentement des parents, etc. Ce n'est donc pas surprenant que plusieurs cas de traite d'enfants sous le couvert d'adoption internationale irrégulière aient été identifiés à divers points de la frontière entre Haïti et la République Dominicaine et dans certains aéroports, particulièrement l'aéroport Guy Mallary. Le souvenir des 33 Américains arrêtés à la frontière est toujours bien frais; à ce souvenir vient s'ajouter le cas récent des pédophiles allemands. 

Il ne fait aucun doute que l'aide humanitaire, comme ce fut le cas dans d'autres pays, a emmené avec elle les prédateurs et les vautours de l'urgence dont le seul objectif est de profiter des situations de chaos pour exercer leurs méfaits ; leur proie de prédilection: les enfants. Alors que la situation de l'irrégularité des adoptions internationales était déjà inquiétante suite au contrôle plus serré des adoptions dans certains pays dont le Guatemala, depuis le tremblement de terre, Haïti attire tous les dossiers frauduleux. Le tremblement de terre est venu en effet mettre à nu des situations d'illégalité, des réseaux de traite et de vente d'enfants, le plus souvent sous le couvert d'adoptions internationales.


Certaines ambassades ont clairement exprimé leur doute quant aux procédures d'adoption postséisme. Cependant, d'autres s'intéressent de plus en plus à l'adoption internationale. Ces dernières, dont celle de France et du Canada s'apprêtent d'ailleurs à célébrer une réunion dite « Réunion du Groupe de Montréal » du 22 au -24 Juin prochain à l'Hôtel Le Plaza à Port-au-Prince. Cette réunion fait suite à une réunion du même type célébrée l'année dernière à Montréal. Le thème central de cette réunion: « l'adoption internationale »; le but: rouvrir la vanne de l'adoption internationale, faire « plaisir » à leurs ressortissants et s'assurer de leur vote. 

Suite au tremblement de terre, la France a fait évacuer plus de 1 000 enfants haïtiens. Pour certains Français, la décision du gouvernement français était "logique et raisonnable". Aussi les 21 et 23 décembre 2010, à la veille de la Noël, des centaines d'enfants ont-ils quitté leur pays dans deux avions affrétés « pour évacuation urgente » à cause du choléra. Ces enfants ne faisaient l'objet que d'un consentement des soi-disant parents et d'une autorisation de l'IBESR. Parmi les enfants arrivés en France, près d'une centaine se trouvent dans une situation juridique floue, vu qu'ils n'ont pas de jugement d'adoption mais un simple apparentement (voir Imbroglio juridique pour les enfants haïtiens adoptés - 31 March 2011).

« Quelques jours après le tremblement de terre, décrète un « Humanitarian Parole Policy », à la faveur de cette politique, des centaines d'enfants haïtiens « orphelins » ou séparés de leurs parents à cause du tremblement de terre ont été « évacués ». Certains se retrouvent aujourd'hui dans les « foster care », abandonnés par les parents adoptifs ». 

L'Hollande, quant à elle, suite au séisme, a décidé « qu'en raison de la situation inquiétante en Haïti, d'admettre les enfants sans qu'ils disposent de documents de voyage en règle. Le gouvernement hollandais décide alors que les enfants seront rapatriés d'abord, et l'approbation des autorités haïtiennes viendra après. (Voir déclaration du ministre de la justice hollandais Hirsch Ballin).

Comme l'a dit un observateur. « C'est la pauvreté qui transforme les enfants en cheptel adoptable pas les familles occidentales riches en mal d'enfants. »

Ce qui étonne, c'est que tous ces pays ont ratifié la « Convention de la Haye sur la protection des Enfants et la Coopération en matière d'adoption Internationale » ; laquelle convention considère l'adoption internationale comme une mesure de dernier recours, et oblige les Etats parties à adopter toutes les mesures visant à maintenir l'enfant dans sa famille d'origine, à envisager l'adoption nationale, et a s'assurer que les parents adoptifs soient réellement aptes à adopter un enfant.

« Il faut en finir avec le marché aux enfants haïtiens, et avec leur pieuse importation » ; ces mots d'un observateur illustrent bien la problématique de l'adoption internationale. 

Il est temps que ceux-là qui prétendent s'intéresser à la situation de l'enfant haïtien se penchent sur les vrais problèmes de l'enfance : l'assistance aux familles nécessiteuses, l'accès à l'éducation et à la santé pour tous les enfants. Rouvrir l'adoption internationale sans mettre des balises solides, c'est livrer des milliers d'enfants à la merci de groupes prédateurs.

La construction de l'Etat de droit passe par la chasse à ces organisations criminelles, et la lutte contre l'impunité devant les crimes perpétrés contre les enfants haïtiens. L'Etat de droit exige des investigations sérieuses visant à démasquer les réseaux de traite et de vente d'enfants, les procédures d'adoption bidon, les individus et les institutions dont le seul but est de s'enrichir aux dépens des petits haïtiens. L'Etat de droit exige également que l'adoption, tant nationale qu'internationale, puisse enfin répondre à sa vraie vocation : celle d'offrir aux enfants abandonnés ou orphelins un environnement familial permanent, chaleureux et sain. 

Pour arriver à cet état de fait, il faut (Que peut faire le président Martelly ?): 
1) Décréter un moratoire (i.e. suspension provisoire) ferme sur les adoptions internationales, particulièrement les adoptions d'enfants haïtiens par les étrangers, jusqu'à la ratification par Haïti de la Convention de la Haye sur la protection de l'enfant et la coopération en matière d'adoption internationale ;
2) Reformer et épurer l'Institut du Bien-être Social ;
3) Mettre l'action publique en mouvement contre les avocats, juges, propriétaires de crèches et d'orphelinats, fonctionnaires de l'Etat et tous ceux engagés dans la fabrication de faux documents, la vente d'enfants, la traite d'enfants ;
4) Mettre sur pied une commission spéciale ayant pour mission 
a. Entreprendre des investigations afin de retracer/retrouver les nombreux enfants perdus pendant le tremblement de terre ;
b. Revoir les adoptions internationales autorisées depuis le 12 janvier 2010
c. Adopter un plan de placement familial pour les enfants et adolescents qui croupissent dans les crèches et orphelinats pour le simple fait que leurs parents n'ont pas les moyens de s'occuper d'eux.
d. Entreprendre des investigations sérieuses sur les irrégularités et les illégalités dans les procédures d'adoption, l'existence et le fonctionnement de ces crèches, orphelinats et maisons d'enfants;
5) Adopter une loi sur l'adoption répondant aux critères et standards internationaux
6) S'assurer qu'Haïti ratifie la Convention de la Haye sur la protection des enfants et l'adoption internationale

Haiti Presidential Decree to Tighten International Adoptions

Haiti Presidential Decree to Tighten International Adoptions

PRESIDENT MICHEL MARTELLY [FILE]

PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti - President Michel Martelly will issue a decree to make law the adoption of Haitian children subject to institutional processes.

The law had begun forming during the Preval administration and has passed a vote in the Chamber of Deputies but is awaiting passage in the Senate.

As the nation is awaiting the ratification of a prime minister, the vote in the Senate is postponed. The President, believing no time can be wasted on the matter, will enact the decree in the meantime.

"While waiting for a vote on this law, a delay I hope will be as short as possible, I intend to issue a presidential decree making it obligatory for adoption applications to go through authorized organisms, as the Hague Convention outlines," Martelly was quoted.

The measure will effectively ban private adoptions, the President concluded.

Babies just another commodity

Babies just another commodity

9:55 am In rural Nepal, where the going rate for a healthy orphan is US$6000 ($7449), about 600 children are missing.

They were taken by agents who came to the villages promising parents they would educate the children and give them a better life in the capital, sometimes for a steep fee. The children never returned.

Between 2001 and 2007, hundreds of Nepali children with living parents were falsely listed as orphans and adopted by high-paying Western couples a world away.

One widow, according to the child protection charity Terre des Hommes, was unable to feed her seven children and sent them to an urban "child centre", where three were quickly adopted without her consent by rich Westerners.

Another, Sunita, was told by sneering authorities she would never see her child again. She doused herself in kerosene and struck a match.

Tens of thousands of babies, toddlers and young children are now adopted across international borders every year, according to Unicef.

The Nepali adoption industry is part of a broader child-trafficking trend which saw some "orphans" from the rural provinces of Humla and Jumla sold to circuses.

Western prospective parents, however, are the preferred revenue stream. Adoption brought US$2 million a year into the country before 2007, when the programme was suspended pending an inquiry that uncovered many cases of abduction and improper financial gain.

Nepal is not the only country where international conventions on the rights of children have been breached as unscrupulous middlemen trade toddlers like livestock to desperate Western couples.

The process is simple: parents in Europe and America contact an adoption agency in the country of their choice, either privately or via a home agency.

Money changes hands, and their papers and the papers of the child are checked, the latter being easy to falsify. More money changes hands, and the child goes home with new parents.

Many of these adoptions are legitimate, beneficial and bring nothing but joy to the new parents and hope to the child. But there is another side. The possibilities for corruption and backhand profit are immense, because the emotional stakes are so high.

"When people want something so very much, like a baby, the amount of money they are prepared to throw at it can be limitless," said Andy Elvin of Children and Families Across Borders.

"In some countries, those amounts of money on offer mean that people do things they wouldn't otherwise do, and that's the problem."

According to Terre des Hommes, there is now, in many cases, "an industry around adoption in which profit, rather than the best interests of the child, takes centre stage".

The business is a seller's market, because there are far fewer orphans in need of adoption than Western prospective parents wishing to adopt.

Although many children adopted in this way do enjoy loving, stable homes with their new families, the number of truly "adoptable children" in overseas orphanages is smaller than the number of prospective parents.

Even in the aftermath of wars and natural disasters, those without a single relative to provide proper care is insufficient to meet the demand for exotic orphans.

After the tsunami in Japan, many Westerners inquired as to when and how they would be able to adopt a tsunami orphan, only to be told any child left parentless would be rehoused with extended family.

There is sometimes a distinct missionary element to this charity.

Christian lobby groups exhort congregations to demonstrate their faith by adopting foreign orphans from countries that know neither Jesus nor Walmart. Networks exist to help individual ministries organise funds to pay the orphanages and middlemen who supply the babies.

Last year, 10 Southern Baptists "obeyed God's calling" by smuggling 33 Haitian children - most solicited from living parents - across the Dominican border to await adoption by American believers.

All were jailed for a time but Christian adoption lobbies in the United States are putting increasing political pressure on organisations such as Unicef to ratify their agenda rather than raising ethical issues about the human rights of the children involved.

There are more mundane reasons why Western couples might wish to adopt overseas rather than be matched with one of the tens of thousands of children in need of adoption at home (many of whom do not match, in age or background, the ideal child some would-be parents want).

One Ukrainian tourist website boasts that "Ukraine has very few restrictions" and adds that unlike many countries, which seek to eliminate unfairness with rigorous matching systems, "prospective parents have the chance to choose the child they wish to adopt".

"Ukrainian children are typically family-oriented, caring, make attachments easily," enthuses the site, as if it were selling a new breed of house pet. "They look to their new parents with adoration."

Elvin, of Children and Families Across Borders, said: "There is an almost inexhaustible demand for very young children to adopt. People looking to adopt are generally looking to adopt children under the age of 3, and preferably under the age of 1. That's your essential problem.

"In America, which is the biggest importer, if you like, there are 23,000 children in the foster system waiting for adoption, but most of them will be aged 5 to 16. There's a very rich, powerful and well-resourced inter-country adoption lobby in the US."

The leading supplier of babies for adoption is China, which sent 5078 children abroad in 2009. It used to be Vietnam, then Guatemala (at one point one in every 100 babies there was sent for adoption to the US). Ethiopia, which until recently, was sending 50 children daily out of the country, announced a clampdown in March. No one knows where the agencies and parents will turn next.

Infant income

* In 2009, the last year for which reliable figures are available, the top five adopting countries took in 24,839 children from overseas.

* Half of these, 12,753, went to the US, with Italy taking 3964, Spain and France around 3000 each, and Canada 2122.

* China, the leading source of babies for adoption, sent 5078 children abroad in 2009.

* Russia sent 4039 and 4564 came from Ethiopia, one of a range of countries which, through lax regulation, had a vogue as a ready source of babies.

- INDEPENDENT

Spain probes 849 cases of alleged baby trafficking

Spain probes 849 cases of alleged baby trafficking

 

Published: Friday, Jun. 17, 2011 - 12:40 pm
Last Modified: Friday, Jun. 17, 2011 - 1:41 pm

Spanish prosecutors are investigating 849 cases of newborn children stolen from their mothers and sold to other families for profit, the country's attorney general said Friday.

Candido Conde-Pumpido said 162 cases had already been referred for trial and only 38 have been dropped for a lack of evidence.

It is well documented that babies were taken from women who had supported the defeated Republican side after Spain's 1936-39 civil war. However, some of the baby trafficking cases are as recent as the mid-1990s.

"A great many Spaniards" had been affected by the scandal, which took place "over a prolonged period of time," Conde-Pumpido said at a news conference.

His office was alerted to the cases by ANADIR, an association of people searching for lost children or parents.

Enrique Vila, a lawyer representing ANADIR, said what had begun as a politically motivated punishment for Republican sympathizers eventually became a purely moneymaking scheme that persisted illegally well past Spain's return to democracy in 1978.

Investigating magistrate Baltasar Garzon has calculated there could have been 30,000 baby thefts in Spain in the wake of the civil war.

Vila has argued that there was more or less a nationwide network behind it, involving doctors, nurses, midwives, nuns and intermediaries that would find children for couples that wanted them. Mothers were told that their babies were stillborn.

"It is not possible to attribute this to a single organization," said Conde-Pumpido, speaking in the eastern city of Valencia following a meeting with prosecutors general from Spain's 17 autonomous regions.



Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/17/3708944/spain-probes-849-cases-of-alleged.html#ixzz1PdcnFskG

Romanian Senate Approves Law Allowing International Adoption By Romanian Citizens

Romanian Senate Approves Law Allowing International Adoption By Romanian Citizens

Romania's Senate on Tuesday adopted a law allowing a Romanian citizen residing abroad to adopt Romanian children.

Romanian Senate Approves Law Allowing International Adoption By Romanian Citizens

The Romanian citizen residing abroad can adopt the child only two years after the adoption procedure has been started, to allow the child to be adopted domestically or by a relative up to the fourth degree who lives abroad.

The law amends Law 273/2004 on adoption. It must now be approved by the Chamber of Deputies.

Ambassador post blocked as US adoptive families fight for release of Vietnamese orphans

Ambassador post blocked as US adoptive families fight for release of Vietnamese orphans

By: Margie Mason, The Associated Press

06/15/2011 4:17 AM | Comments: 0

In this June 3, 2011 photo, Marsha Sailors holds up a photo of herself and three-year-old Vietnamese girl, Claire, whom she and her husband are hoping to adopt in the room they prepared for the child in their Kansas City, Mo. home. Three birthdays have since passed, but the child has never slept in the room or worn the clothes hanging in the closet. After nine trips to see the girl Sailors and her husband named Claire, the couple are no longer even allowed to visit her. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

HANOI, Vietnam - Marsha Sailors painted the nursery pink and green at her Missouri home, put up princess pictures and built a crib for her new little girl. They hadn't yet met, but she already was in love with the smiling 6-month-old in a photo sent from Vietnam.

Three birthdays have since passed, but the child has never slept in the room or worn the clothes hanging in the closet.

Sailors and her husband visited the girl they named Claire a combined nine times in unsuccessful attempts to bring her home, and now are barred from any further contact.

Instead, Claire remains stuck inside a decaying Vietnamese orphanage along with 15 other kids who also have American families waiting to adopt them. Their cases went into bureaucratic limbo in 2008 when Washington suspended its adoption agreement with Vietnam over broad suspicions of fraud and baby selling.

"I just can't spend a lot of time in her room because it's just so sad," said Sailors, from Kansas City, who celebrated the past two Christmases at the orphanage in southern Bac Lieu province with her husband Chuck before authorities barred the visits in January.

"We're just longing to bring her home because otherwise her future ... I can't go very far down that road before my heart starts to break," she said.

Most of the adoptions already in the pipeline went forward under exceptions to the 2008 moratorium, but paperwork problems delayed the Bac Lieu cases. Vietnam now says it hopes to join the international Hague Convention on adoptions in October and that the pending cases must start over under those tighter rules, which bar prospective parents from even seeing the children until everything is finalized.

Some families blame the U.S. State Department for the hold up, arguing it has pressured Vietnam so hard to impose stricter regulations that their cases ended up getting stuck. They're now hoping for exemptions and have gained some leverage: Two U.S. senators have blocked President Barack Obama's pick for the new U.S. ambassador to Vietnam over the issue.

"If the Department of State can get a killer out of Pakistan, I think they can manage to get 16 unwanted orphans out of Vietnam," said Matthew Long of Merritt Island, Fla., referring to the U.S. mission that killed Osama bin Laden. He is waiting for the release of 4-year-old Ava. "They just need some help finding that will."

The orphanage is a two-room former prison deep in Vietnam's Mekong Delta. Couples had rotated visits there before January, each time taking food, milk, clothes and toys for the children who otherwise receive very little.

They brought video cameras to capture the moments and document the changes every parent yearns to see. With no shared language, they communicated using hugs and kisses.

Since then, photos sent by other visitors reveal that the children have lost weight.

Three Florida families have enlisted the help of Sen. Marco Rubio, who a placed hold on the ambassador nominee after Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar lifted a similar block. Rubio has concerns over the State Department's handling of the "long-delayed adoptions," said his spokesman Alex Burgos.

In 2007, 828 babies went home with American families, including actress Angelina Jolie's adoption of a 3-year-old boy. That was up from 163 the year before.

Washington ended the joint agreement in September 2008 after a spike in the number of abandoned babies, raising concerns about whether the children truly were voluntarily given up by their birth parents as U.S. law requires.

Months earlier, the U.S. Embassy in Vietnam reported evidence of fraud, bribery, kidnapping and outright baby-selling for adoptions that can cost more than $20,000. Washington had previously halted an agreement in 2003 over similar concerns, and resumed it three years later after safeguards were supposedly put in place.

After the 2008 suspension, most of the 534 cases already being processed were resolved and the children were allowed to leave. But officials put the brakes on Bac Lieu cases because irregularities were uncovered, including wrong birth mothers' names on paperwork, according to Keith Wallace, director of Families Thru International Adoption, the Indiana agency brokering the adoptions.

He said they reinvestigated most of the cases and fired a staffer who had taken "short cuts."

In one case, a baby who already was matched with an American family was returned to its birth mother because her financial situation had improved after she married, he said. In other cases, the agency obtained DNA samples and new paperwork from birth mothers stating they knowingly gave up their babies, Wallace added.

"Nobody doubts that these kids are orphans. Nobody," said Kelly Ensslin, a North Carolina lawyer representing two families. In 2008, she spent 10 weeks in Vietnam fighting to get her own adopted daughter out.

"It's full of so much drama, and it's sadly on the backs of these kids," she said.

Alison Dilworth, adoptions division head at the U.S. Office of Children's Issues, said Washington has pressed Vietnam's Communist government to release the children, but that officials there have refused to provide information on why they rejected the cases.

"We've made it very, very clear that we want them to move forward on these cases, and I can understand why the parents are absolutely frustrated," Dilworth said.

She denied that Washington's push for Vietnam to join the Hague Convention was to blame for the hold up, saying the adoption agency may have raised false hopes that these cases were still moving forward.

"I think they told a lot of their clients that it was the big, bad U.S. government that was stopping things, when in reality, we've never had a chance to even take a look at these cases," she said by phone from Washington.

Vietnam prohibited The Associated Press from travelling to the orphanage, and adoption officials in Bac Lieu province declined to comment.

In a written response to questions from the AP, Vietnam's Adoptions Department said all 16 cases are ineligible for processing under the old system and will go forward under the new Hague rules expected to be adopted Oct. 1. The toddlers will first be put up for adoption within Vietnam. If no one comes forward, they can then be paired with foreign families. A process that will take months, at best, if the American families are re-matched with the children.

But Marsha Sailors vows to never give up the fight. She said Claire, whose Vietnamese name is Yen, made a clear connection early on, telling mommy she loved her in her native tongue the first time they met.

She is desperate not to let the child she considers her own to be abandoned for a second time in her short life.

"I realize she doesn't yet understand fully the love between a mother and child, but to me, this interaction, at her own initiative, tells me that she understands the bond that we have," Sailors said. "And she knows that she is ours."

Couples sue adoption agency for "bait, switch" scheme

Couples sue adoption agency for "bait, switch" scheme

PHILADELPHIA | Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:05pm EDT

(Reuters) - Five couples claim an international adoption agency that promised each a baby from Guatemala scammed them in a "bait and switch" scheme and are suing under a federal law more often used against mobsters and drug dealers.

The lawsuit against Main Street Adoption Services, based in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, was filed under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) statute.

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of five couples from Illinois, Minnesota and Louisiana, accuses the agency and three individuals of conspiring with one another "for the illegal purpose of committing fraudulent adoptions through a bait and switch scheme, an adoption scheme that offered illusory promises."

The prospective parents in 2007-2008 spent up to $25,000 each for adoptions that have not yet been completed, and may never be, the lawsuit said. The couples suffered humiliation, outrage, indignation, sleepless nights, and severe emotional distress, court documents said.

Neither the defendants nor their lawyer could be reached for comment on Wednesday. A lawyer for the couples declined comment.

In each case, the promise was that a young child was awaiting the couple in Guatemala. But in each case, things went wrong, even after the couples had traveled to Guatemala to meet the children.

In one such case, in 2007, a couple was assured that they would be meeting their new daughter, Madeline, at a hotel in Guatemala. By that point, they had paid $12,500.

Nobody showed up at the hotel with the child, and they received a call from the agency saying the birth mother had reclaimed Madeline 11 days before they arrived in Guatemala, the lawsuit said. They were "heartbroken, devastated and appalled," according to court papers.

The couple then quickly fell in love with a second child, the suit claimed. But eventually, that adoption also fell through. By then the couple had paid over $25,000.

The suit demands the adoption agency pay each couple triple the amount of their losses as well as cover court costs and damages of more than $75,000.

(Editing by Barbara Goldberg and Peter Bohan)