Home  

Hole that swallows babies - hjow kids are spirited away

Hole that swallows babies
-how kids are spirited away
CHANDREYEE GHOSE AND SANJOY CHATTOPADHYAYA
When a child is born roughly every two seconds, some babies of unfortunate mothers will leak out of the system and go on the market for adoption at a price.
Manwara Seth, of Canning, has filed a petition in Calcutta High Court claiming her child was stolen from a government hospital in South 24-Parganas and sold to a childless couple. The couple insisted that they had paid Seth’s family for the child, who is now seven.
Public prosecutor Asimesh Goswami said: “A DNA test has been ordered to decide who his future guardian will be.”
The Telegraph exposé in Saturday’s paper had revealed how a baby-selling network operates with the connivance of nursing homes, mostly in Calcutta’s suburbs, and doctors, audaciously turning an illegal transaction legal.
Government hospitals are as leaky. A health officer at one revealed that in two cases over the past four-five months, he had received information about abandoned babies but they were gone before he could take them to a children’s home.
On a third occasion, he was informed about a baby being abandoned, but when he went to get it, the baby was missing, only to reappear miraculously when he raised a hue and cry.
Unwanted babies can be made to elude the official network at many points. The first is where the baby is found or rescued. Under the rules, a rescued baby has to be presented before the state government’s Child Welfare Committee — there is one in each district —within 24 hours of its being found. Only this committee has the authority to issue a fit-for-adoption certificate for a baby.
Whether a child is produced or not depends on the intentions of the finder. With nursing homes and hospitals not being too particular about sticking to the law, the committee has no way of sniffing out who is spiriting away babies where.
Abandoned babies are rescued by Childline, an NGO that has the government’s support, and by police, and produced before the committee. Mothers who want to surrender their babies have to go directly before the committee. This is on paper.
The Calcutta committee recently asked a hospital for an explanation why a four-month-old baby was handed over directly to a couple.
“The couple had approached the court, arguing that since the child was ill and needed special care, they could not go to the committee first and delay the whole process,” said Amita Sen, the chairperson of the Calcutta committee.
In Calcutta, there may not be full compliance with the rule of taking the baby before the welfare committee, but the situation is better than in the districts. Indrani Sinha, a member of the South 24-Parganas committee, said: “Abandoned babies are rarely presented before the committee. One or two a month, maybe.”
They are handed directly to parents wishing to adopt and, since the process takes place outside official supervision, a range of unwanted results for the baby becomes possible.
Till last year, the committee’s existence went unheeded by the system though its pivotal role as the custodian of abandoned and surrendered babies was worked into law in 2006. Sen said: “Most agencies would not bring the babies before the committee.”
The acronym-laden layers of the adoption structure, a creation of government guidelines and Supreme Court directions, worked the way they felt best until 2009. Neither the Central Adoption Resource Agency, which is the mother body for adoption in the country, nor the Bengal social welfare department, its state-level representative, did anything beyond the odd half-hearted attempt to straighten out the system.
One example of their reluctance to act relates to an adoption monopoly that grew under a lawyer named Anil Bhuniya, who was allowed for two decades till 2009 to approve, scrutinise as well as, allegedly, hand babies over to adoptive parents. Bhuniya denied that he was ever involved in the last activity.
Apart from once writing a letter objecting to Bhuniya’s role in approval as well as scrutiny, the central agency did nothing. The social welfare ministry even helped Bhuniya establish control over the system.
The Telegraph sent a questionnaire to the central agency seeking to clear doubts about how the adoption system works and about overlapping laws, of which there are three. After sitting on it for two weeks and several reminders, it sent this helpful reply: “You have asked so many questions. Please see CARA (the agency)’s website… for more details.”
It did reveal, though, that a probe is under way against one of Bhuniya’s two organisations. It does not reveal that for years it — and the state social welfare department — had failed to set up in Bengal a second approval mechanism, known as the adoption co-ordinating agency, to smash Bhuniya’s hold.
In another example of inaction, the government, in Delhi in this case, has increased the dependence of adoption agencies on donations from adoptive parents. The agencies are supposed to receive substantial budgetary support from the Centre but are not getting it.
If the old system had a dark hole through which babies disappeared as they were handed directly to adoptive parents without official supervision, either with court registration of the adoption or without, the recast network with welfare committees in every district may not be working any better.
There are complaints that the committees act the same way as the older system did, handing over babies directly to adoptive parents, though this is the job of the adoption agencies that maintain a list of hopeful couples. The committees also put babies in temporary foster family care, instead of children’s homes or adoption agencies, till the fit-for-adoption certificate is issued.
An official of the Calcutta committee admitted placing abandoned babies in foster care. “A newborn needs a mother’s lap rather than a children’s home,” she said. At its best, this is the do-gooder guiding spirit — without regard for law or system or the future well-being of the child — in giving babies away for adoption.
A former social welfare official said on condition of anonymity that there were no records of how many children had been placed in foster care by the committees. Nor is there any knowledge if these children are later given away by the foster parents or kept by them.
If babies falling through the system without a clue is the most frightening feature, another is the lack of data beyond basic adoption figures. How many children are brought before each district committee, how many are abandoned, how many surrendered — the system is clueless.

Vietnam adoption procedures treat children as 'commodities'

Vietnam adoption procedures treat children as 'commodities'
October 31, 2010 8:00 PM EDT
The disclosure emerged in internal US State Department documents which reveal a network of people, from adoption agency representatives, orphanage directors, hospital administrators right through to government officials and local police, were profiting by paying for children, as well as coercing and defrauding natural parents into giving up their children for adoption. 

The documents, from 2007 and 2008, show in some cases, children were simply stolen from their families to sell them to unsuspecting American couples. Throughout hundreds of pages of material, US officials – including the country's ambassador to Vietnam, Michael W Michalak, and Assistant Secretary of State Maura Harty – express their growing concerns over adoption practices in Vietnam. 

Following these concerns, which included evidence of "baby farming" and "baby selling", the USA eventually decided not to renew its bilateral agreement with Vietnam in September 2008. 

Ireland followed suit in May of 2009. 

It is understood the Irish Embassy in Vietnam had also expressed "serious concerns" as to adoption practices in the country. 

The US documents also show US adoption agencies' contracts with provincial authorities for "humanitarian donations" was putting pressure on the adoption system to meet the growing need to provide children for adoption. Ireland has adopted more than 600 children from the south-east Asian country between 2002 and 2008. 

The new Adoption Act, which comes into force today, will finally complete Ireland's ratification of the Hague Convention on inter-country adoption. 

Irish people approved to adopt from abroad will only be able to adopt children from a Hague Convention country or from a country with which Ireland has a bilateral agreement. However, anybody who has a declaration of suitability to adopt before the November 1 will be allowed to proceed with a non-Hague country.

Adoption Act will provide more partner countries

The Irish Times - Saturday, October 30, 2010
Adoption Act will provide more partner countries
Pat and Nora Butler: "Vietnam is going to ratify the Hague Convention next year, so we are hopeful."

Micheál Martin's daughter dies in LondonGlut of housing is laid at door of local authoritiesProtestant women happier with church than Catholics'Grave concerns' expressed for health of deported childReorganisation of chronic illness treatment aims to save 450 livesFour-year plan to be tackled at Monday meetingJAMIE SMYTH, Social Affairs Correspondent

THE GOVERNMENT has moved to ease the concerns of people in the process of adopting children from abroad promising a new adoption regime will provide more partner countries for them to adopt from.

It has also been claimed that the long and stressful assessment process that couples must undergo before they are allowed to adopt children should also speed up under the new regime due to begin onMonday.

Minister for Children Barry Andrews said yesterday the Adoption Act 2010, which enters into force on Monday, would open the doors to a host of new countries for Irish couples hoping to adopt abroad.

By ratifying the Hague Convention on inter-country adoptions, Irish couples could theoretically adopt from 83 countries such as Britain, Mexico and the Philippines, he said.

The Hague Convention safeguards the fundamental rights of children in inter-country adoptions, in both their country of birth and the country of adoption. Further safeguards aim to prevent the abduction, sale and trafficking of children for adoption.

Many couples going through the assessment process with the Health Service Executive are concerned because the Authority will not authorise new Russian adoptions because it has not ratified the Hague Convention.

Russia currently supplies the largest number of adopted children to Irish couples. In 2008, 117 Irish couples adopted a child from Russia and 1,229 have been adopted from Russia since 1991.

Several parents of adopted children from Russia, or who are going through the adoption assessment process, told The Irish Times they fear there could be long delays to new countries coming on stream under the new adoption regime.

“I fear that people who get declarations to adopt after November 1st will face delays as the new adoption system beds down. The structures may take a few years to get into place,” said one parent

Mr Andrews said the Adoption Board had worked very hard to issue “declarations of eligibility and suitability to adopt” to ensure very few people would “get caught out” in the transition period.

Any couple who is provided with a declaration from the board is still allowed to proceed with an adoption from non-Haguecompliant countries such as Russia for a maximum period of three years.

Mr Andrews said the new Adoption Authority, which will be appointed on Monday, would also move very quickly to agree the necessary administrative agreements with Hague compliant states to facilitate adoptions for couples.

“These administrative agreements are different from the type of bilateral agreements we have negotiated between countries to facilitate adoptions. They are far less complex,” said Mr Andrews.

He said he was also willing to travel to Moscow to try to agree a new bilateral adoption agreement with Russia.

Mr Andrews said the Act provided for the appointment of accredited agencies to do assessments that were previously undertaken by the HSE. This would “speed things up” for couples, although it would take a while for the transfer to take place, he said.

Mr Andrews said he acknowledged the pain that the closure of certain countries – Vietnam, Guatemala and Ethiopia – to Irish couples seeking to adopt abroad had caused in the past. He said he was trying to resolve the situation for 20 couples seeking adoptions in Vietnam when all adoptions to Ireland were halted in June 2009.

The Adoption Board will be formally dissolved on Monday and replaced with a new Adoption Authority. Child law expert Geoffrey Shannon will remain on as chairman of the authority. The authority will see the appointment of a psychologist, a social worker and a GP to its board as decreed under the Adoption Act.

COUPLE STUCK IN LIMBO


Pat and Nora Butler have been trying to adopt a child from Vietnam for the past 5½ years. A decision by the Government to suspend adoptions from Vietnam last year has left them, and 19 other Irish couples, stuck in limbo. Here Nora tells their story

I was 38 years old when we started on the adoption process with the authorities. I am 42 years old now, but I still have no family, says Nora Butler.

It is the length of time that it is taking that is the biggest problem, and your age does catch up with you. Our lives have been on hold during this whole stressful adoption process. We kept putting holidays off, thinking that we’d be travelling to Vietnam to pick up our baby. But it just hasn’t happened.

We had an unhappy experience with several IVF programmes, which turned out to be unsuccessful. This took five years, so all-in-all we’ve been trying to start a family for a decade. Time is our biggest enemy, because the likelihood of being allowed to adopt a second child reduces as you get older.

It took about two years before the process properly began after our application. Our social worker started our assessment and we took our pre-adoption course.

The country that you choose to adopt from is a very personal issue for each couple. We undertook research and chose Vietnam because we thought it would be safer, as the guidelines were well established.

Adopting from Vietnam costs about €7,000, while other countries can be much more expensive than that.

We got our “declarations of eligibility and suitability to adopt” after about three years. We then went to Helping Hands Adoption Mediation Agency, which mediates with the Vietnamese government.

However, the bilateral agreement between Ireland and Vietnam lapsed in June 2009. A few months later, a report came out on Vietnamese adoptions, which was negative towards adoptions from abroad.

About 79 Irish couples already had referrals of Vietnamese children and they were able to proceed with the adoptions.

But 20 couples who were still awaiting referrals of children, including us, were not allowed by the Government to proceed due to the findings of the report.

We are just waiting now. The Minister for Children has told us he is trying to get the adoptions through and is awaiting a response from the Vietnamese government.

Our biggest problem is the lack of communication from the Government. We know a lot of people who are finding it very difficult to keep going. It is a very personal issue for the couples involved. We know there isn’t a hope in hell of our adoption going forward this year, but I think next year it will come through for us. Vietnam is going to ratify the Hague Convention next year, so we are hopeful.

Our hearts are set on Vietnam now. If we had switched country we may have had a child by now but we see a good happy culture and a good attitude to Irish people adopting from the country.

Babies for sale

Saturday , October 30 , 2010 |

Babies for sale

The Telegraph exposé: Newborn and legal papers, all for Rs 2.5 lakh

CHANDREYEE GHOSE AND SANJOY CHATTOPADHYAYA

A baby can be bought for Rs 2.5 lakh in Calcutta for adoption through an illegal process that in the end yields legal papers, two Telegraph journalists have found.

„Da muss man die Notbremse ziehen“

"You have to pull the emergency brake"

Youth offices are pushing 11 to 17-year-olds off to foreign projects. Education is promised to children in the most remote regions of the world, but some problem kids end up being cheap labor. Hard-to-control organizations benefit from it.

The promise sounds really good: "Living without consumption - just but warm". Thus, the prospectus of the Protestant Martinswerk Dorlar for its "measure in Transylvania".

In "suitable Romanian family circumstances," German problem children could "go back in time" with a "fully functional interpersonal network."

The 14-year-old Marcel from the Ruhr area is now at the behest of his youth office since last year in that "wholesome world", which will allow him later "in Germany a new start". The office had sent the divorce child with stress symptoms in school and family in a Romanian village.

Romania Adozioni Internazionali: passi in avanti verso la riforma della legge.

Romania International Adoptions: steps towards reform of the law.
Important steps are being made in Romania for the affirmation and defense of the right of children to "receive the care necessary for their well being and thus their right to live and grow up in a family including the taking international law by 2001 in this country is effectively denied.

And 25 October to submit a proposal to amend the current Romanian law regulating adoptions and thus international adoptions.

What has been done is the last step of the work of the Romanian Association Catharsis in collaboration with the Districts to protect children from all over Romania, some authorized institutions including Italian and Friends AIBI adoption.

The bill was drafted to the Commission for Human Rights of the Romanian Parliament will be the case because a new law later this year.

In the first week of November the Association Catharsis, led by President Nitrogen Popescu, must be present for the third time in front of this committee because the law can then vetted by the Romanian Parliament and groped approval.

==================

Romania Adozioni Internazionali: passi in avanti verso la riforma della legge.

Passi importanti si stanno compiendo in Romania per l’affermazione e la difesa del diritto dei minori a “ricevere le cure necessarie al loro benessere” e quindi al loro diritto a vivere e crescere in una famiglia anche tramite l’adozione internazionale, diritto che dal 2001 in questa nazione è di fatto negato. 

È del 25 ottobre scorso la presentazione di una proposta di modifica dell’attuale legge rumena che regolamenta le adozioni e quindi anche le adozioni internazionali.

Quello che è stato fatto è l’ultimo passo del lavoro compiuto dell’Associazione rumena Catharsis in collaborazione con i Distretti per la protezione dell’infanzia di tutta la Romania, alcuni enti autorizzati italiani tra cui AiBi e Amici dell’Adozione.

La proposta di legge elaborata  è stata presentata alla Commissione per i diritti umani del parlamento rumeno perché possa essere così approvata una nuova legge entro la fine dell’anno.

Nella prima settimana di novembre l’Associazione Catharsis, guidata dal Presidente Azota Popescu, dovrà presentarsi per la terza volta di fronte alla suddetta commissione perchè la legge poi possa passare al vaglio del Parlamento rumeno e tentare l’approvazione.

Adoption project a community affair

Published - Thursday, October 28, 2010 
POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (No comments posted.) 

Adoption project a community affair

A couple years ago when Kelli and Jeff Prodzinski of West Salem decided they wanted to adopt a child, they discovered it was a far costlier proposition than they could comfortably handle on their own — the child they are poised to adopt next month is going to cost them at least $30,000.

“Although we know people who’ve adopted, they’re far wealthier than we are,” Kelli said. 
All four Prodzinkis — from left, Janessa, Kianna, Jeff and Kelly — are hoping to travel to Florida later this month to add a new member to their West Salem family. 
Photo by Michael Martin

On the other hand, the Prodzinskis have always known they were going to add to their family. They have two daughters now. Kianna is 16 and attends Coulee Christian School, while Janessa is 10 and is being home-schooled by Kelli.

While researching adoptions on the Internet, the Prodzinkis came across the idea of fundraising to finance an adoption. “At first, I thought it was ludicrous,” admitted Kelli.

In time, however, she and Jeff, who works in information technology at Mathy Construction, have embraced the process wholeheartedly. They say it’s taught them so much about the goodness of their neighbors, their fellow parishioners at First Free Evangelical Church in Onalaska and many people they’ve never even met.

“I really think that, if I had to do it over again and knew what I know now, if someone just wrote us a check for $30,000, I think I’d turn it down,” Kelli said.

Even so, Kelly confesses the adoption process has been extremely exhausting. There were background checks and fingerprinting, followed by months and months of waiting. Their adoption request was miscoded and adoption officials mistakenly believed they were looking for a girl child (they were open to either gender).

Kelli and Jeff checked with various organizations before forming a connection with a woman with Catholic Charities in La Crosse. From there, they found an agency in Florida called Chosen Child that helps families adopt children that are difficult to place.

“One reason we picked them was that we were told they had a quick turnover — if you adopt a baby from China it can take three or four years,” Jeff said.

They were eventually chosen as a potential adoptive family by an African American woman from Florida who has a due date of Nov. 29. The woman already has a 15-month-old and didn’t think she’d be able to take care of another child. The father, a Haitian, had stated that he had no interest in raising the child.

The fact that their child will have a darker skin color is not an issue. The Prodzinskis have a brother-in-law who is African American and another from Saudi Arabia. “Our family is a real melting pot,” Kelli said.

Their adopted child will have a family with different shades of skin, Jeff added.

After they learned the adoption was in the works, the Prodzinskis raised funds in various ways, including a rummage sale at Coulee Christian this summer that pulled in more than $5,000. There was a very successful fundraiser at Burracho’s restaurant in Onalaska this past Monday and a “barn dance” at Concordia Hall in La Crosse last weekend that drew several hundred people and raised more than $3,000.

“That was fantastic!” Kelli said of the Concordia fundraiser. “And the fundraiser at Burrachos wasn’t even our idea. We stopped in to ask them about donating some gift cards and they suggested it themselves.”

One of the conditions of the adoption is that all the costs be paid 30 days ahead of time. According to Kelli, that will mean the family may have to dip into savings or use credit cards. They will get a large adoption credit on their income tax, but they won’t see that benefit until next spring.

The Prodzinskis emphasized that they have received plenty of support — both financial and spiritual — from their fellow church members at the First Free Church.

“They’ve gone through the blood, sweat and tears just as much as we have,” Kelli said. “They’ve spent countless hours and sleepless nights, but they’ll come up to us and say ‘Thank you for letting us be a part of this.’ They also say, ‘We are blessed to help you do something that is bigger than ourselves.’”

Their could well be more stress ahead, since a mother always has the option to change her mind at the last moment. Kelli and Jeff have come to terms with that possibility and plan to be there at the time of birth anyway.

They plan on booking airline tickets and considering that the due date is right around Thanksgiving and they won’t know ahead of time the exact date, that is going to be another expensive proposition.

“They’re going to call us when she goes into labor,” Kelli said. “All four of us are going to go down — it’s a family thing. If it doesn’t work out, then we’ll all grieve together. She (the birth mother) did send us a picture of her son, so that is a good sign, but you just never know.”

Asked whether all the paperwork, waiting, stress and uncertainty has been worth it, the Prodzinskis had a one-word answer: “Absolutely!”

They both talk about how the community response has reinforced their faith in human nature. Jeff recalled a moment during the rummage sale at Coulee Christian when it began to rain (sale items were displayed in the parking lot): “Everyone rushed to pick things up and help us get them inside, even though they didn’t have to do that. You realize that people genuinely want to do good.”

Kelli said that she’d been contacted by two women she had never met before. Both had lost their babies during childbirth. “They said ‘We just wanted you to have these items,’” she recalled.

“We’re going to make a scrapbook for the baby some day so he or she can see how the whole community was behind this,” Jeff said.

“We’d also like to inspire other to know this is doable,” Kelli said. She said she’s already been approached by people wanting to know how to do what the Prodzinskis have done.

“There’s one other thing,” Kelli said. “We’re hoping and praying we’ll be able to somehow minister and help the birth mother. We don’t know yet how we’ll be able to do that, but we hope to find a way.”

Dezv?luire ?oc! Acesta este copilul pe care Adina Barbu l-a abandonat în maternitate la 17 ani!

Dezv?luire ?oc! Acesta este copilul pe care Adina Barbu l-a abandonat în maternitate la 17 ani!

Posted on 28 October 2010 by Clauditza

O informa?ie ?oc a fost dezv?luit? în aceast? sear?! Adina Barbua adus pe lume un b?ie?el, pe care l-a abandonat în maternitate în 1999, când avea doar 17 ani.
De?i a spus c? nu a fost niciodat? îns?rcinat? ?i c? poate demonstra oricând acest lucru cu un examen ginecologic, se pare c? Adina a min?it!

Jurnali?tii de la Libertatea au aflat c? bruneta a adus pe lume , la Bra?ov, un b?ie?el, la 1 septembrie 1999, care a fost adoptat în 2000 de o arhitect? greac?. Într-un facsimil se vede foarte clar c? numele Adina Vasilica Ciuciu apare ca fiind mama natural? a copilului în actul de adop?ie.

În certificatul de na?tere, bruneta nu a trecut numele tat?lui b?ie?elului, nedorind s? îi dezv?luie identitatea b?rbatului cu care a r?mas gravid?.

Pân? s? fie adoptat, copilul a fost în grija unui asistent maternal.

Copilul tr?ie?te acum cu mama sa în Grecia, dar identitatea lor a fost protejat?. Purt?torul de cuvânt al Direc?iei pentru Protec?ia Copilului Bra?ov, Radu Mailat, a confirmat informa?ia ?i a f?cut public dosarul de adop?ie.

Într-o edi?ie a emisiunii “R?i da buni” de la Antena 2, un fost iubit al Adinei a f?cut public? aceast? informa?ie bomb? . B?rbatul a dezv?luit la momentul respectiv c? a avut un copil cu tân?ra din Bra?ov ?i a ajutat-o s? plece din maternitate, abandonând bebelu?ul. Adina Vasilica Ciuciu a negat atuncil, spunând c? totul este o inven?ie.

Adina Barbu d? în judecat? publica?ia care a publicat ?tirea!

Adina Barbu a intervenit în emisiunea lui Dan Capatos ?i a spus c? îl va ac?iona în instan?? pe autorul materialului. Informa?ia bomb? a ap?rut exact de ziua Adinei, când împline?te 28 de ani.

“Sunt abera?ii! Nu are nicio leg?tur? cu mine, nu în?eleg cum se poate ca numele meu s? apar? într-un act oficial! M? duc la ginecolog, fac teste ADN, nu am nicio problem? s? dovedesc c? nimic nu este adev?rat! Nu se poate s? mi se pun? în cârc? a?a ceva! Îi dau în judecat?!”, a spus ea, la “Un show p?c?tos”.


Sursa:Cancan.ro

Keep International Adoption an Option

Keep International Adoption an Option
By Katie Prigel Sharp
I just read an article titled Ethiopian Adoptions Rise, Bucking Global Trend. The article discusses changes in international adoptions from a global perspective and highlights the fact that although many children are currently being adopted from Ethiopia, most other countries that used to allow international adoptions have either shut down or have dramatically slowed in international placements.
I worked at an international adoption agency during the time Romania shut down in 2003. Our small agency had been active in placing children from Romania for many years and the founder, Deb Murphy Scheumann opened and operated a baby house (or orphanage) in Botosani, Romania. The operation of the baby house was truly a labor of love and the agency spent a great deal of time and money helping not only children who did not have families to care for them, but also the larger community of Botosani through their role in bringing the Medical Missions Foundation to the area.
To be clear, the vast majority of folks working in international adoption (myself included) believe that ideally children should stay in their family of origin and/or country of origin whenever possible, but that when those two options are not possible, international adoption is preferable to growing up without a permanent family.
This was the case with the children served by the baby home founded by Deb. There was no one to care for them in Romania, but there were families here in the US who were in the process to adopt them when Romania stopped international adoptions, leaving these families and children in limbo.

Children Living in Deb's Hosue
Fast forward… The adoption agency closed and years later these same children remain in Romania and furthermore, still do not have permanent families. Many folks here in the US who had attempted to adopt them, had adopted other children internationally or who had been involved in the Medical Mission work have not forgotten them and do the best they can for these children. In spite of tremendous financial and other difficulties, the baby house remains open and is now known as Deb’s House. It is now managed by United Aid Foundation and many individuals are committed to doing the best they can for these children through supporting them and keeping them together as a “family” until they reach the age of 18.
I am in awe of the love, commitment and tireless work these individuals and organizations put into Deb’s House and are investing in these children. It is inspiring and amazing. But, it is still not optimal for these children. These kids are some of the “lucky ones” and yet they are not growing up in a loving, permanent family. No matter how wonderful Deb’s House is, it is not the same as a permanent forever family.
Romania is not the only country. There are children in Guatemala, Vietnam and most recently, Nepal who have loving families waiting for them across the world, but due to the closure of international adoptions will instead grow up with no family at all and most will not even have the love, concern and support of groups like Deb’s House or United Aid Foundation.
Are there problems with international adoption? Sure. Is it the best case scenario? No. We wish that no child would ever suffer abuse, neglect and that all parents would be able to provide loving, stable homes for their children. But, that is not reality and when others in the child’s community or country cannot provide a family for a child, they should not be denied the chance to have family through international adoption.
It’s not just about policy. It’s not just about principles or politics. It’s about individual children like these little ones–the majority of which do not have anyone speaking for them or supporting them.

Séminaire sur l’Adoption Internationale Mali

La Direction Nationale de la Promotion de l’Enfant et de la Famille (DNPEF), autorité centrale malienne en matière d’adoption, a organisé en collaboration et avec l’appui de l’Ambassade de France au Mali, un séminaire de formation et de sensibilisation sur la thématique de l’Adoption du 26 au 28 Octobre 2010 au Centre International des Conférences de Bamako.
BMP - 236.3 ko
Ouverture du Séminaire
La cérémonie d’ouverture a été présidée par Madame MAIGA Sina DAMBA, Ministre de la Promotion de la Femme, de l’Enfant et de la Famille, Michel Reveyrand de Menthon, Ambassadeur de France, les représentants de l’UNICEF, du Parlement des Enfants et de la COMADE.
L’Ambassadeur de France a souligné dans son discours les avancées du Mali en matière d’adoption internationale, notamment par l’application de la Convention de la Haye, qui protège les enfants contre les dérives liées à l’adoption. Il a rappelé que l’adoption internationale devait être prise comme une mesure de protection de derniers recours, lorsque toutes les possibilités locales ont été étudiées.
Madame la Ministre, a évoqué quant à elle, l’importance de cette rencontre, première du genre au Mali, pour harmoniser les connaissances des différents acteurs sur ce thème. Ce Séminaire doit servir de base au forum sous-régional sur l’adoption que le Ministère souhaite organiser l’année prochaine après celui de Ouagadougou en 2009.
BMP - 257.9 ko
Public du Séminaire
Tous les maillons de la chaîne de la protection de l’enfance abandonnée ont répondu présent : Commissaires de police, Brigade des mœurs, Agents des directions régionales de la promotion de l’enfant, Personnels encadrant des orphelinats, juges pour enfants, Organismes agrées pour l’Adoption, Autorité centrale malienne, etc.
Des experts maliens comme le Dr SIMAGA, doyen du Séminaire ou M. Mamadou KEMA, membre du haut conseil islamique, sont intervenus sur le système de l’adoption traditionnelle et la kafala, adoption simple, reconnue par le droit islamique.
Mme Carlotta ALLOERO, expert du Service Social International (SSI/CIR), organisation internationale spécialiste des droits de l’enfant privé de famille, sise à Genève, est intervenue sur les principes de fonctionnement de la Convention de la Haye, le suivi post-adoption ou encore l’évolution du contexte mondial de l’adoption internationale. De nombreuses questions et débats ont suivi chaque intervention, enrichissant encore d’avantages ces journées.
Le chef de l’autorité centrale malienne pour l’adoption, le Dr Alou BARRY qui est intervenu sur le contexte malien de l’adoption, a constaté le manque d’information des acteurs sur ce sujet (ex :critères d’adoptabilité des enfants, procédures de l’adoption, application de la convention de la Haye au Mali…). Cet événement est selon ses dires « tombé à point nommé ».
Le séminaire a en effet permis de former la plus part des participants sur les différentes formes d’adoption au Mali et leurs implications sur l’enfant et la famille adoptive.
BMP - 296.9 ko
Carlotta ALLOERO - Dr BARRY - Marie JENNY
Tous les professionnels du secteur doivent avoir le souci du respect du dispositif de la Convention de la Haye, les intérêts des enfants adoptés et des familles adoptantes ne seront correctement pris en compte et bien défendus que dans la rigueur, l’éthique et la transparence.
Ces journées ont été l’occasion d’établir un premier bilan concerté sur l’application de la Convention de la Haye au Mali, entrée en vigueur en septembre 2006. Les forces de sa mise en œuvre mais aussi ses faiblesses ont été examinées durant les travaux en groupe.
De ces échanges, très constructifs, sont nées des recommandations en faveur des enfants privés de famille.
Recommandations sur le système de l’adoption au Mali établies à l’issue du Séminaire. Retour à la table des matières
- Promouvoir l’adoption filiation au niveau national (c’est-à-dire l’adoption d’un enfant malien par un couple malien devant un juge).
- Renforcer le suivi des structures d’Accueil et de Placement pour Enfant ;
- Créer des structures d’Accueil et de Placement au niveau des régions.
- Renforcer les capacités des acteurs sur la question à travers l’organisation de rencontres de ce genre,
- Renforcer la collaboration entre les services techniques qui interviennent dans le domaine de la protection de l’enfance,
- Intensifier les actions de prévention de l’abandon.
L’adoption nationale est très peu développée au Mali, en effet entre 2003 et 2009, 24 enfants ont été adoptés par des familles maliennes contre 600 par des familles européennes (France, Espagne, Italie, Allemagne…).
Le thème de l’Adoption, dans sa globalité est sensible, tantôt soumis à des tabous culturels et religieux, tantôt soumis aux interrogations et craintes de trafic et d’enlèvement. Une sensibilisation du grand public doit prendre le relais pour promouvoir l’adoption nationale d’une part et informer sur le système sécurisé de l’adoption internationale au Mali d’autre part.
L’Ambassadeur de France a invité l’ensemble des participants le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 pour la cérémonie de clôture à la Résidence. C’est dans ce contexte convivial que Michel Reveyrand de Menthon a tenu à féliciter la Direction Nationale de la promotion de l’Enfance et de la Famille pour l’organisation de cette rencontre et l’engagement de tous les participants en faveur du Droit de l’Enfant à une famille.
BMP - 270.2 ko
Cérémonie de clôture du séminaire à la Résidence de France