Home  

Reopening of adoptions in Romania? The issue is addressed in Petitions Committee

Google translation:

Date: 08-03-10

Reopening of adoptions in Romania? The issue is addressed in

Petitions Committee

A first step to ensuring a family for abandoned children

African Blog: ADOPTION IN KENYA

ADOPTION IN KENYA

Kenya is a country with over 2.4 million orphans, whom majority of them have no hope for tomorrow even though it’s hard to control the children being born and abortions being illegal, the rise of abandonment is great and something needs to be done. These country of 80% Christians as it is claimed but it shows the decay in morals. Adoption doesn’t seem like an option in this country at the same time the stigma of adoption still haunts those who want to adopt and most of the adoptive parents have been so traumatized with the process that barely talk about it. From my research in this country it’s easier to start a Children home than to adopt because one hustles and resources wasted and time wasting that one can die or become bankruptcy or lose your job with court mentions and some intimidating judges, the adoptive parents whether local or international they are not willing for that victimizing experience again. That’s why about 90 parents in 2007 came together to form the adoptive parents of Kenya even though we have met several time most parents what things done in secret; for they to stigmatized with adoption process and in the fight for orphans, adoptive parents contribute to this stigma, for they don’t really advocate for adoption and this group have really been slow to advocacy, but within the committee one can note the complacency of their responsibility and lots of board meetings that bear no fruit but looking to me us the problem I being the chairman, its easier how people forget that the Constitution is the guide it’s a problem in this country people easily forget the objective and defend their interest more than others, while they violate and I don’t know why in this country orphans tends to enrich people in the name of charity. The most annoying thing is that how can stigmatize parents lead stigmatized parents or how can stigmatized parents advocate for orphans, it’s a circle of confusion in the adoption world. I think the issue of ethnicity tends to affect most things in this country, us if one tribe seem to work effectively with their own than another tribe where suspicions tends to dominate the whole meetings, , what people think of others its what they are but the question is, is it about the welfare of the children or ourselves? So for the adoptive parents to be more effective they must come out of their cocoons of stigma and talk about adoption as the best thing that ever happened to them. The world is a small place while the adoptive parents hide there secret it will be revealed by time Another issue that really affects adoption in Kenya is the African culture, which different societies have upheld, to this time and that is every married woman must give birth, and those who don’t give birth are really victimized because of their state and ridiculed and even driven off with the in laws. Most people have not fully embraced adoption because of the out come of those children, there is this myth that those abandoned children can turn out to be worst due to their immoral parents this perception has put fear on most people who want to adopt. Another very disappointing issue is that of wealth because in this country adoption is regarded for the wealthy couples because they only can afford the finances to pay the lawyers and the lawyers seem to make money out of these and so affects the normal average couples who really want a child, the perception that the adopters have money still is strong in this country, from most domestic parents it’s a burden for life is full of financial complications. Another factor is the wealthy Europeans who come to adopt in this country and pay well the lawyers and their firms, them to have contributed to hurt domestic adoption I believe they don’t mostly understand there negative impact on the local adoption if they did they would have allowed Africans to solve there problems despite a child having a better life abroad they can still have a better life in Africa that’s what I believe , no matter how many Europeans adopt the local adoptions should be prioritized for domestic adoption is a problem and remains huge. I don’t know how true this is but it’s said that the Europeans who adopt in this country, most of them are returned back the money spent in Africa. If it’s true then that’s why the adoption agencies prefer more the Europeans than their own. Is this reasonable whereby one European couple can adopt a child in Kenya and spend over a million shillings and the process of adoption takes over three months and deny more than twenty locals an opportunity who could have taken over twenty orphans into there homes, because they cant afford that money for the legal process its truly absurd and at the same time these Children homes can only take in a certain percentage of children the rest remain on the streets and their populations is growing and our streets are a dangerous place to walk when darkness fall. If nothing is done we might have orphans uniting to fight institutions because they have nothing to gain or loose, and that’s very serious in these century to get terrorist is easier than twenty years ago. While other charitable institution have selected a few and made them their own children, to look like private property, no one knows what is going on in this institutions that has always raised many an answered questions even though they seem to be protecting this children, this have been a thought that these children’s are atypical and abused that destroys self esteem in this orphans. The environment we subject the child affects creates emotional disturbance and this produce physiological changes this always concerns with problems of morals. One would not that those who have charitable institution tend to have excess wealth that sometimes raises questions, while the children in those intuitions seem to be struggling with life. There is nothing wrong having the necessary money but a lavish life and the institutions are not well managed I think that’s a big problem but if you live in these country people tend not to empower the poor that fear makes people be more rulers than leaders. From my personal analysis of most charitable institutions in my country those managed by Europeans are the best, because you will never hear weird scandals that are going on in our media. Another area that these institutions have not been effective is in sensitizing the community around them about orphans, that’s why most orphan children think they were a mistake and feel rejected and integrating in the community becomes an issue. It’s very important not to overlook the work of these charitable institutions they have done a superb work and they really need compliments because Kenyans have not taken the issues of vulnerable children as the Kenyan problem and the mistakes of our fellow country men but the wickedness of women forgetting that men have contributed to this. The actual record of charitable institutions in this country I have no idea but one thing I know there many and the secrecy of this institutions have bred dishonesty in this institutions. In this country I only know four adoption agencies that am sure, this is where the whole circus is; even though they help there have been silent rivalry between this agencies; some agencies tend to do well than others and it seem it’s a kind of who acquires more client from abroad and these agencies seem to like affiliating with abroad agencies more because of the rewarding ignorant clients than encouraging domestic adoption. And this donor funding that seem to flow in this agencies tend to raise questions, another thing is very interesting is that it seems every agencies have their own lawyers, while others run the whole show from the institution to the agency to the law firm. Because of few adoption agencies and few lawyers who practice family law, the adoptive parents are held hostage by them; the adopter has no choice but to pay the high fee. And because the bureaucratic nature of the adoption system in this country, them in the system they all are good friends to each other and they have been there for long, no matter your complain to the children services they take long to respond and they can even sue you if you raise some complicated issues. The adoption agencies mostly destroy information’s of parents who have given up there children for adoptions with collaborations with the children homes so that the child in my opinion may never trace back where he came from, and they tell the adopting parents to tell the adopted child the truth, if the child should know the truth then it should be the whole truth without fear of its repercussions. Another thing to note is that lawyers seem to work with these agencies through the social workers and it seems there issues that they collaborate with them, then they are given some cash, so the question arises why do that social worker only want the adoptive parents to go to only that specific law firm and not others. And why the courts through the agencies do only appoints the some specific social workers as the Litem. I visited two agencies for the first time in my country, and because I walked in, in simplicity and I sat at the reception waiting to see those in charge, its amazing when few Europeans came in they got kind of attention more than me their country men and I was sent to see someone who can’t help me who was subordinate and in the other place I was under interrogation. I think the problem in Africa is Africans themselves. Orphans are African problem of this century; the Africans should take responsibility and the Europeans should help Africans first solve there problem than creating another problem in Africa which makes the Africans look idiots, those international adoption agencies should help the natives adopt more and more, and those Affiliations with the local adoption agencies who don’t advocate for local adoption they should severe there partnership. And they should help the Africans adoptive parents do the advocacy for adoptions in all societies

s

US Embassy Ethiopia letter to Agencies - extra requirements

a penny sa...

Joined on 07-19-2009

Atlanta, GA

318 Posts

6,208 Points

The forgotten children of Romania

The orphanages were overcrowded and filthy, the living conditions unworthy. beginning of

The orphanages were overcrowded and filthy, the living conditions unworthy. At the beginning of the 1990s, Romanian children were redeemed through adoptions - so it seemed. But what actually became of them is uncertain. The fear: Many could have fallen into the hands of human traffickers.

BUCHAREST. When twins Zoe and Mikaela Radford were left by their birth parents in a maternity ward in the small Romanian town of Puciosa in 1991, they were only a few days old. They were adopted and moved to Canada with their foster parents - it is said. Little Jonathan Yourtee was probably taken to a hospital in Constanta by his parents. In 1991 he was taken over by a family from the United States. Later, the new parents also adopted Jonathan's brother Matthew. In 1995 he left home, the destination is unknown.

Reporters from the Romanian newspaper "Romania Libera" tried in vain to find out what became of Zoe and Mikaela, Jonathan and Matthew. They are just four of thousands of cases, of whom nobody knows how they ended up growing up and where exactly they live. Today they would have to be young adults - Romania's forgotten children who disappeared from the country's overcrowded orphanages after the collapse of communism over 20 years ago. At that time, trading in children became an international business.

Anyone could "pick up" a child in Romania if they wanted to. Without a lot of bureaucracy and long waiting times, as is usually the case with adoptions. However, as soon as the children left the Romanian border, their tracks were lost. Quite a few, it is feared, could have fallen into the hands of human traffickers and been forced into prostitution.

The forgotten children of Romania

The orphanages were overcrowded and filthy, the living conditions unworthy. beginning of

The orphanages were overcrowded and filthy, the living conditions unworthy. At the beginning of the 1990s, Romanian children were redeemed through adoptions - so it seemed. But what actually became of them is uncertain. The fear: Many could have fallen into the hands of human traffickers.

By Andreea Pocotila

and Dan Alexe

BUCHAREST. When twins Zoe and Mikaela Radford were left by their birth parents in a maternity ward in the small Romanian town of Puciosa in 1991, they were only a few days old. They were adopted and moved to Canada with their foster parents - it is said. Little Jonathan Yourtee was probably taken to a hospital in Constanta by his parents. In 1991 he was taken over by a family from the United States. Later, the new parents also adopted Jonathan's brother Matthew. In 1995 he left home, the destination is unknown.

Russian officials call for suspension of adoptions to U.S. parents after death of Dillsburg-area boy

Russian officials call for suspension of adoptions to U.S. parents after death of Dillsburg-area boy

By LARA BRENCKLE, The Patriot-News

March 05, 2010, 12:00AM

Provided by ITAR-TASS News Service

Nathaniel Craver and his twin sister pose in this undated photograph.

Change in Processing Timeline for Adoption Cases

Change in Processing Timeline for Adoption Cases

March 5, 2010

The Department of State shares families’ concerns about recent media reports alleging direct recruitment of children from birth parents by adoption service providers or their employees. In response to these reports, the U.S. Embassy in Addis Ababa has implemented some changes to adoption visa processing. Adoptive parents should be aware that an I-604 (Determination on Child for Adoption, sometimes referred to as “orphan investigation”) must be completed in connection with every I-600 application. Depending on the circumstances of the case, this investigation may take up to several weeks or even months to complete. Therefore, adoptive parents should not plan to travel to Ethiopia until they have confirmed with their adoption agency that their visa interview appointment has been confirmed.

Adoption agencies submit case paperwork to the U.S. Embassy for review before the Embassy schedules the immigrant visa appointment. In some cases the I-604 determination could take several weeks or more from the time a case is submitted to the U.S. Embassy to the scheduling of a visa interview appointment. We understand that in such cases this will result in a longer period before parents are able to bring their adopted children to the U.S. However, this additional scrutiny is required to ensure that the adoption is legal under both U.S. and Ethiopian law. The U.S. Embassy will work with adoptive parents and their adoption agency to ensure that each case is processed in the most expeditious manner possible in accordance laws and regulations. Families should continue to work through their agency to schedule immigrant visa appointments and answer questions regarding pending cases.

If families have concerns about their adoption, we ask that they share this information with the Embassy, particularly if it involves possible fraud or misconduct specific to your child’s case. The Embassy takes all allegations of fraud or misconduct seriously.

INDIA - MC nuns struggle to give babies for adoption

INDIA - MC nuns struggle to give babies for adoption

Published Date: March 5, 2010

Missionaries of Charity nuns and volunteers at a home for ‘unwanted’ children

RAIPUR, India (UCAN) — A bureaucratic tangle is delaying attempts by Missionaries of Charity (MC) nuns to give orphan babies up for adoption.

On Aug. 31, 2009, the Chhattisgarh state government allowed the nuns to give babies up for adoption, listing the nun’s center as a licensed agency for promoting domestic adoption.

Caution About Pursuing an Adoption in Nepal

Adoption Alert

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Bureau of Consular Affairs

Office of Children’s Issues

Caution About Pursuing an Adoption in Nepal

Future of the Ethiopia–Australian Intercountry Adoption Program

Future of the Ethiopia–Australian Intercountry Adoption Program

The Attorney-General, the Hon Robert McClelland MP, has decided to lift the suspension of the Ethiopia–Australia intercountry adoption program. The program will recommence accepting new referrals of children in need of intercountry adoption and matching these children with prospective adoptive parents as at 6 April 2010.

The Ethiopia–Australia program was suspended in November 2009 due to concerns that Australia could no longer conduct intercountry adoptions in Ethiopia in a manner consistent with its obligations under the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in respect of Intercountry Adoption.

In January 2010 an Australian delegation travelled to Ethiopia to discuss the current suspension with the Ethiopian Government and to investigate options for the future of the program. The delegation obtained additional information about the requirement for Australia to provide development assistance and how this might be done in a manner consistent with the Hague Convention. The visit also provided the Department with an enhanced understanding of the practical challenges facing the program.

Information gathered during the delegation visit was incorporated into the Department’s formal review of the program, which has been underway since June 2009. The Department received over 400 submissions about the program, which were also considered in the review process.