Home  

Bappi verjaardag » Reisverhalen » antoni-in-bangl…

Bappi verjaardag

18 feb. 2009 ???????? vanuit Bangladesh 1.134 keer bekeken

Hoera ineens gratis internet

op de luchthaven van Dhaka, maar ik moet wel snel zijn want na plm 5 minuten stop de PC weer

gisteravond de verjaardag gevierd van de kok en één van de bewonders van Asha Nir.

Das "SterniPark" -Imperium

Das "SterniPark" -Imperium

SANDRA SCHÄFER

Kein anderer Kita-Betreiber hat in den vergangenen zwei Jahren durch Immobilienkäufe so viel von sich reden gemacht wie "SterniPark". Der Träger erwarb vier Stadtvillen in bester Lage, an der Reventlowstraße, Wrangelstraße und Rothenbaumchaussee. Die Investitionskosten werden auf vier Millionen Euro geschätzt. Und immer gab es Auseinandersetzungen mit Nachbarn, die die Kita verhindern wollten. Doch warum kauft "SterniPark" teure Immobilien? Und warum stößt "SterniPark" oft auf Proteste? Eine Analyse:

Warum hat "SterniPark" immer Ärger mit den Nachbarn? ",SterniPark` will immer mit dem Kopf durch die Wand", sagen Kritiker aus der Kita-Szene. Sie werfen dem Träger vor, er prüfe vor dem Kauf einer Immobilie viel zu wenig, ob sie sich für eine Kita eigne und sich in die Nachbarschaft einfüge. Andere Träger sehen eher vom Kauf einer Immobilie ab, wenn sich Probleme abzeichnen.

Warum kauft fast nur "SterniPark" neue Immobilien? "SterniPark" will expandieren und setzt dabei auf Immobilienkäufe. Der stadteigene Kita-Träger "Vereinigung" (170 Kitas) schafft ebenfalls neue Kita-Plätze, setzt dabei aber auf Erweiterung bestehender Kitas. So wurde etwa die Vereinigungs-Kita an der Wrangelstraße aufgestockt und hat nun 220 Plätze. Erweiterungen bergen weniger Konfliktpotenzial. Allerdings hat SterniPark kaum Möglichkeiten zu erweitern.

Adoption from Kazakhstan to the Netherlands

 

February 15, 2009
Adoption from Kazakhstan to the Netherlands

Category: Column, Conveniently travel - Lammert @ 11:10
The last time I receive many requests for information or to Dutch assistance in adopting children from Kazakhstan to the Netherlands. I think this discussion of the forum, Kazakhstan has contributed. This is me by name as someone who would have good information to help.
I always leave these questions unanswered.

International adoption is one of the most significant actions that can be done in the life of a young child. A child is thereby permanently out of sight and the culture of his biological parents met. This process is not reversible. Television shows like Vanished show that this process is unfortunately a part of the children in permanent damage.
 
In order to provide sufficient safeguards to the child for adoption Netherlands regulated by treaties between countries, and through adoption of professional organizations. Between the Netherlands and Kazakhstan are not tolerated where adoption is regulated, nor are organizations with experience in the Netherlands adoption of adoption from Kazakhstan. In Belgium the situation is different and adoption from Kazakhstan is a relatively normal phenomenon.

Adoption scandal has prompted only minor changes

 http://www.sltrib.com/ci_11700836
 
 
Adoption scandal has prompted only minor changes
Focus on Children » Defendants in the case likely to get probation.
By Pamela Manson
The Salt Lake Tribune

Salt Lake Tribune
Posted:02/14/2009 06:00:00 AM MST

A federal indictment accusing a Wellsville agency and its workers of tricking parents in Samoa into giving up their children marked a rare prosecution in the international adoption industry.
But the use of trickery, coercion or kidnapping in foreign countries to place children with American families is far from unusual, according to advocates with watchdog groups who say the Focus on Children case bolsters their calls for reform.
"There's no real consequences now," David Smolin, a law professor in Alabama and the parent of an internationally adopted child, said of agencies and adoption facilitators accused of wrongdoing.
To stem abuses, Smolin and others are pushing for national adoption laws to replace a patchwork of state laws; limiting the amount of money involved in the adoption of foreign children to prevent human trafficking; and making U.S. agencies responsible for the actions of their overseas contractors. They also want more prosecutions and harsher punishment for offenders.
Kimberly Kennedy, a board member of Parents for Ethical Adoption Reform (PEAR), is urging U.S. District Judge David Sam to impose significant sentences when defendants in the FOC case are sentenced later this month. Under plea deals, the U.S. Attorney's Office is recommending probation.
"What this agency did in Samoa will have long lasting effects for families and children," Kennedy, the California parent of internationally adopted children, wrote to the judge.
A 2007 federal indictment accused the defendants of coercing and tricking parents in Samoa into placing their children for adoption, then falsely claiming that the children were orphans. Five defendants have pleaded guilty to misdemeanor counts.
Barbara McArtney, an attorney in Grand Island, N.Y., who runs an accredited adoption agency and serves on PEAR's board, said prosecutions of U.S. adoption agencies are rare.
One of the few prosecutions similar to FOC's was the case of Lauryn Galindo, who was accused of falsifying immigration documents to make it appear that Cambodian children placed for adoption through her agency were abandoned.
In fact, prosecutors alleged, some of the children were bought from their parents for small amounts of money and Galindo, in turn, charged adoptive parents in the United States large fees. She pleaded guilty to several charges, including visa fraud and money laundering, and was sentenced in 2004 to 18 months in prison.
Many nations, including the United States, have signed on to the Hague Convention on International Adoptions, an agreement among the participants to follow certain procedures. However, enforcement can be difficult and some countries, such as Samoa, are not parties to the agreement.
"No one is watching on a federal level," said Joni Fixel, a Michigan lawyer who has represented prospective adoptive parents in lawsuits against adoption agencies. "We need another department in the Department of Homeland Security to make sure these types of cases don't happen. We don't want to become a haven for children being illegally adopted."
In addition, American adoption agencies are regulated by states. PEAR board member David Kruchkow said if a problem arises with an international adoption, states generally say they have no authority over the case.
That, in turn, leads to federal prosecutions for misdemeanor visa violations, said Kruchkow, a Florida high-school science teacher.
Kruchkow said he and his wife were victimized when they adopted a little girl from Mexico, a Hague Convention country, in the late 1990s. They later learned that a Mexican lawyer and two consultants in New York, where the Kruchkows lived at the time, had forged their daughter's paperwork.
Both McArtney and Smolin believe capping fees connected to adoptions could curb many problems. The amount paid to facilitators and lawyers overseas for identifying children for adoption and completing their country's paperwork can be multiple times the average annual income of the country, according to Smolin, who teaches at Samford University in Birmingham, Ala., and has written extensively about international adoption.
Smolin also proposes making American agencies legally responsible for the actions of their foreign partners, saying many U.S. placement agencies have a "see-no-evil, hear-no-evil" attitude toward how adoptees are obtained overseas.
Federal prosecutors charged two Samoan citizens who helped Focus on Children locate children for adoption -- Tagaloa Ieti and Julie Tuiletufuga -- but the government has so far been unable to extradite them.
The criminal case against FOC doesn't address the status of the Samoan children who were placed for adoption. However, Tom DiFilipo, president and CEO of the Joint Council on International Children's Services, an association of adoption and child advocacy groups in Alexandria, Va., said because the children are U.S. citizens, it is very unlikely they would be sent back to Samoa.
But they may be back in contact with their birth families. The plea agreements require the defendants to pay into a fund to facilitate communication between both sets of parents.
Smolin likes the idea. He and his wife, Desiree, adopted two adolescent girls from India whose birth mother, they later learned, had been told her children would be temporarily placed in a boarding school.
The couple were able to eventually track down the mother and take the girls to visit her. But keeping the girls in touch with their mother has been costly, Smolin said.
"If they get the (FOC) trust fund together, the children ought to go back a few weeks every year," he said.
pmanson@...
Lisa Rosetta contributed to this article.
The Focus on Children case
Five agency operators and employees will be sentenced on Feb. 19 and 25 for misdemeanor offenses involving the adoptions of Samoan children.
In January, Focus on Children principals Karen and Scott Banks; Dan Wakefield, who located Samoan children for adoption; and caseworkers Coleen Bartlett and Karalee Thornock pleaded guilty to counts of aiding and abetting the improper entry of an alien for putting false information on immigration forms.
Their plea agreements have a recommendation for probation, but U.S. District Judge David Sam could impose up to six months on each count and a $5,000 fine.
Focus on Children, which arranged adoptions of children from a number of foreign countries, ceased business in Utah in the summer 2007.
The prosecution halted all international adoptions in Samoa. Earlier this month, Attorney General Ming C. Leung Wai said overseas adoptions are allowed only if the application certifies the child does not have a family or suitable person to provide care and no other suitable arrangements can be made in Samoa.

Handel in kinderen keihard aanpakken

13 februari 2009 - Handel in kinderen keihard aanpakken

CDA-kamerlid Marleen de Pater is bezorgd over het gemak waarmee een kind via internet kan worden gekocht. Ze heeft minister Hirsch Ballin (Justitie, CDA) gevraagd de wetgeving aan te scherpen. Volgens De Pater zijn er te weinig juridische instrumenten om het kopen van een baby via internet tegen te gaan. In de Tweede Kamer werd over dit onderwerp gedebatteerd naar aanleiding van de ophef, drie maanden geleden, rond de aankoop van een baby uit België door een Nederlands echtpaar. Een Gents paar van 22 en 24 jaar wilde om financiële redenen het tweede kind afstaan. Via internet vonden ze een Nederlands echtpaar dat de baby in juli direct na de geboorte kwam ophalen. Het kind werd bij de burgerlijke stand ingeschreven onder de naam van de nieuwe Nederlandse vader.

‘Ik respecteer het als ouders een kinderwens hebben. Maar het kopen van een kind mogen we onder geen beding toestaan. Een kind is geen koopwaar’, aldus De Pater. De handel in baby’s moet dan ook keihard worden aangepakt. ‘Je ontneemt een kind zijn identiteit en ieder mens heeft het recht om te weten waar hij vandaan komt.’ De Pater wil dat illegale opneming van kinderen in een gezin kan worden aangeduid als ‘kinderhandel’. Volgens het Wetboek van Strafrecht is hiervan pas sprake als uitbuiting aan de orde is. Het CDA heeft ervoor gepleit om aan het wetsartikel toe te voegen dat het niet in alle gevallen om uitbuiting hoeft te gaan.

Geschreven door: frans
Geplaatst op: 16-2-2009
Aantal keer bekeken: 72

'Sorry, I can't disclose the identity of Haynes's mum'

'Sorry, I can't disclose the identity of Haynes's mum'

9/2/2009
Mayura Janwalkar / DNA

Mumbai: Twenty-one years after 85-year-old Clarice D’souza gave away Jennifer Haynes, 28, in adoption to US national George Hancox, she filed an affidavit in the Bombay high court, stating that she could not disclose the identity of her biological mother.

Haynes was deported to India owing to incomplete adoption formalities at the time of her adoption in 1989.

Haynes, who was separated from her American husband and two children — aged six and five — as a result of her abrupt deportation, had alleged various malpractices under the guise of foreign adoptions and sought action against the Americans for International Aid and Adoption that processed her adoption.

Refuting allegations made by Haynes, D’souza, a trustee of the now defunct Kuanyin Charitable Trust from where Haynes was adopted, has stated that many children are adopted by US nationals and they settle and adapt well.

D’souza has stated that Haynes allegations are baseless and her petition in court is not maintainable, as she has not exhausted the remedies available to her.

An exasperated Haynes said: “More than anything else, I want to go back to my children. But now that I am here in India I want to know something about myself, my family, my mother. I don’t want to go back to the US empty-handed.”

But D’souza’s affidavit suggests she will have to remain clueless about her parents. The 85-year-old said that revealing her mother’s identity would be a breach of confidentiality her mother was promised at the time of surrendering her child. She also states that it is now over 20 years since the documents were submitted to the court and she does not have them anymore. Haynes’s advocate Pradeep Havnur has sought two weeks time from the court to file a reply.

Copil de 4 ani, trimis inapoi la cersit in Italia de justitia romana

Copil de 4 ani, trimis inapoi la cersit in Italia de justitia romana

7 februarie, 10:43

ZIUA foto

Un copil de numai patru ani, pus sa cerseasca de propria familie in Italia, starneste un adevarat scandal diplomatic intre autoritatile romane si cele italiene. Totul a pornit dupa ce Tribunalul de Roma a decis ca baiatul sa fie trimis in Romania si sa fie ingrijit de un asistent maternal, dar justitia de la noi a hotarat ca acesta sa fie incredintat mamei naturale, inapoi in Italia, transmite RealitateaTV.

Insusi ministrul de Externe italian, Franco Frattini s-a aratat extrem de ingrijorat de cazul copilului si le cere autoritatilor de la Bucuresti sa ia masuri.

No Adoption in France for Algerian/Moroccan Children

No Adoption in France for Algerian/Moroccan Children

by Gilles Cuniberti on February 6, 2009

Children from Algeria or Morocco may not be adopted in France. This is because under French law, the law of the child controls the issue of whether adoption is possible at all. Thus, children from countries where adoption is unknown are unadoptable. As there is no adoption in Islam, children from countries such as Algeria and Morocco may not be adopted.

The rule is not new. It is the result of a statutory intervention of 2001, which has amended the Civil Code.

Article 370-3 of the Civil Code now provides:

State sees no loopholes in adoption

State sees no loopholes in adoption

POST REPORT

KATHMANDU, FEB 06 -

The government and representatives of organisations working for children have said that the survey report, which claims to have found loopholes in the adoption process, is far from truth.

They have urged the Hague Conference on Private International Law, which prepared the report, to substantiate its claims.

Blog: Continuing efforts to bring our children home (gray area)

Continuing efforts to bring our children home

February 5th, 2010

There have been monumental efforts by many to bring our children home from Foyer de Sion. This effort continues and it looks like additional children will be flown to Miami this weekend to awaiting families. The exact number is still undetermined but we anxiously await notice of which children will be coming home.

In the interim we invite you to read the following articles:

Utah Hospital Task Force: http://www.ldsmag.com/churchupdate/100205life.html