Home  

Over 2,000 Orphans Await Adoption in India, West Bengal Tops the List

More than 2,000 orphaned children are currently awaiting adoption across India, with West Bengal having the highest number among the states, according to data shared by the Women and Child Development Ministry. Minister of State for Women and Child Development, Savitri Thakur, presented the statistics recently, revealing that a total of 2,321 children are in the adoption pool nationwide.

Thakur noted that most Prospective Adoptive Parents (PAPs) prefer to adopt younger children, particularly those below six years of age and in normal health, through the designated CARINGS portal. “If there is availability of a lesser number of such children in the adoption pool, the waiting period for PAPs may be higher,” she stated in a written response.

Among the states, West Bengal has the highest number of children awaiting adoption at 309, followed by Maharashtra with 261, Odisha with 225, Bihar with 205, and Telangana with 197.

The minister also provided insights into child nutrition and welfare. She stated that as per the projected population, India had approximately 13.75 crore children up to the age of five in 2021. However, only 7.49 crore children in this age group were enrolled in Anganwadis and registered on the Poshan Tracker as of February 2025.

Further, out of the 7.25 crore children measured for growth parameters like height and weight, alarming figures were recorded. About 39.09 per cent were found to be stunted, 16.60 per cent were underweight, and 5.35 per cent were wasted, indicating severe malnutrition concerns among young children in the country.

NOVA - Co Paulus - Meiling (Youtube)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDzajxnRquohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDzajxnRquo

I heard it. Actually quite interesting that his own two kids come from the same orphanage…

 Von: 
Gesendet: Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 00:00
An: Arun Dohle
Betreff: NOVA tv tonight

At this moment Co Poulus in NOVA - Co Poulus says a nightmare for adoption parents and Meiling but what about adoptees...he even says that what they do is in the interest of the child.

 Because it has to do with the adoption channel. He pin points on the procedure which they follow. Because of that Meiling should not be blamed. But former director Zef Hendriks stated that in 1990 the Dutch Ministry of Justice and even Meiling was informed by the Dutch Agency Wereldkinderen. But Co Poulus still denies any responsibility and knowledge about the whole situation.

Opinion: Or should we stop adopting altogether? (Hoksbergen - no)

https://www.topics.nl/opinie-of-moeten-we-maar-helemaal-stoppen-met-adoptie-a17221107vk/b0475b3cb93b8b4f86e8775799b9470f435e0dfa439f81787a0cefac3e22d8a8/?context=zoek/?query=Adoptie&referrerUserId=fada8eeaca184a46babdb0855ef66e3a

After an adoption stop of a year, adoptions from abroad will soon be resumed, under stricter conditions. But wouldn't it have been wiser to stop intercountry adoptions altogether?

Last week, Minister Franc Weerwind for Legal Protection presented a proposal on how to proceed with the intercountry adoption system, which had previously been fiercely criticized by the Joustra Committee, after which the then Minister Dekker promptly suspended all adoptions.

The 'polder solution' that is now before us is that adoption will continue, but that four intermediary agencies will be reduced to one foundation, which the government can monitor more closely. Weerwind itself wonders how the required substantial investment relates to the decreasing number of adoptions, sometimes under a hundred children each year. The question is: wouldn't it be wiser to stop altogether?

Inez Teurlings, on behalf of the Interlandelijk Adoptees Foundation (SIG) and self-adopted:

E-Mail Regarding Hoksbergen Chennai

Betreff: my first meeting with Hoksbergen and Mary Rukmani´s case

I met Hoksbergen at the YWCA Chennai- run by Sarah Chanda- close friend of sister theresa.

First thing he said to me…” oh..i head you are so angry on the adoption system…and you have a right to”….my neck hairs were going up….i said yes..of course I m angry….he said I can help you…I know even people ( most likely SD Gokhale) who are very close to your indian family…I m going to Pune and I could possibly mediate…- I replied you can try- but I don´t think you have a chance….i felt he was playing a game- and I know no one can mediate in my case.- just no way….Later we went to his room with his friend/ companion and watched the documentary about my story…he then also showed me the annexed gpapers…and told me that his friend Andal asked him to search for that child….i read it…..read Christ Faith Home – ICCO ( german now defunct criminal agency) and Meiling partner…..i said give me a copy, he refused…I told him, that Andal´s Damodaran´s ( ICCW/ scrutiny agency)duty would have been to lodge a complaint and that he is now used to cover up a kidnapping case. We got in a sort of fight. I was really furios.- however maintained basic courtesy.

Later I met Sarah Chandon and her friend…talked with her about the adoption issues. There for the first time in my life I received subtile death threats, that Chennai is such a dangerous place and that people get just killed or other terrible things. Clear advise was given to me to not dig into this adoption mess.

Arun Dohle

'Adoptie in India goed geregeld'

'Adoptie in India goed geregeld'

Gepubliceerd: woensdag 23 mei 2007 16:38
Update: woensdag 23 mei 2007 16:48

De kans dat er wat mis is met de adoptie van een kind uit India, is heel klein. Dat zegt directeur Ina Hut van Wereldkinderen in een reactie op de adoptie van een kind uit India door een Nederlands paar. Het jongetje zou ontvoerd zijn.  

Wereldkinderen en Meiling, die de omstreden adoptie verzorgde, regelen enkele tientallen Nederlandse adopties van Indiase kinderen per jaar.  

De Indiase wet schrijft voor dat een moeder die haar kind ter adoptie aanbiedt bedenktijd krijgt. Daarna moet het kind eerst aan drie Indiase families worden aangeboden voordat het in aanmerking komt voor adoptie door buitenlanders.   Wereldkinderen en Meiling zijn aangesloten bij Euradopt, een Europees samenwerkingsverband van adoptieorganisaties die dezelfde ethische regels hanteren.  

Als het waar is dat een door Nederlanders geadopteerd Indiaas kind is gestolen van zijn eigen ouders, zoals uit een reportage van Netwerk zou blijken, is Wereldkinderen heel benieuwd hoe dat mogelijk is, zegt Hut.
Professor René Hoksbergen, deskundige op het gebied van adoptie, sluit echter niet uit dat het ter adoptie aanbieden van ontvoerde kinderen in India vaker voorkomt.

Minister stelt onderzoek in

 

 

India wil adoptiekind terug

Book Hoksbergen - Hoksbergen convinces Els Wunnink to work for BIA

Rough translation – Book Hoksbergen – Page 82 – 83

Beginning 1975 follows the adoption channel India. At that time already 30 children had come via private channels from Bombay (Mumbai), Pune and Madras (Chennai) to the Netherland. Already in the sixties children left India, especially to the US. This went all rather easy, as India only regulated adoptions somewhat in 1984. Negative publicity, in 1982, about the death of an adopted child on its way to its adoptive parents, was probably the reason for this (Apparao, 1997).

WK board member Rene Hoksbergen goes to Mumbai, end 1974, to convince a private mediator, Els Wunnink, that it is much better and safer to mediate through an adoption agency. And also to use the arrange the placements through the order of the central waiting list of the Dutch Ministry of Justice.

After the visiting of 15 children’s homes in five far apart cities in India and after long talks, Els decides to do all further mediations via WK. In 1976 already many more children are coming from India than before. . Els Wunnink lives in such a big apartment that she can take care of the adoptable children there before they go to the Netherlands. Many years she has 5, 6 children in her house, for whom she cares together with some Indian women. In 1976 Els hires social worker Sulu Kalro, who works up till now for WK. Through her children’s home Bal Anand in Mumbay some 1500 children came to our country. Els Wunnink moves in 1977 to Indonesia and will be active for WK until 1981. She opens in Jakarta the children’s home ‘Pondok Palangi’ hut regenboog, which develops into a small centre for medical help to children.

The other India channel is being managed by the family Van der Mark. This mediator has himself adopted end of the sixties a girl from India, possibly the first adopted child from India. After pressuring from WK, this couple ends begin 1975 their private contacts with some children’s homes in Pune, and Indian city of aprox 2 million inhabitants at that time, and hands them over to WK.

Hoksbergen agrees with Roelie Post on conflict Hague/UNCRC

Roelie Post

A word of caution.

The Hague Adoption Convention is pro-adoption biased.

And conflicts with the UN Convention on the Rights of the child.

HAC was created because UNCRC renders intercountry adoption as good as impossible (art 21b).

Transcript interview Netwerk Geert-Jan Lassche - Hoksbergen


>From: @netwerk.tv>
>To: Geertjan Lassche <geertjan@hotmail.com>
>Subject: gesprek Hoksbergen
>Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:36:44 +0100
>
>Hoi Geertjan,
>
>Mijn batterij van mijn telefoon is op, dus ik ben even onbereikbaar.
>
>Zie onderstaand (tegenstrijdig) verhaal van Hoksbergen over MASOS en/of zie
>bijlage.
>
>
>Hoksbergen (gesproken 13/3/2007)
>
>Ik ken de organisatie MASOS. Via een contactpersoon van Wereldkinderen ben
>ik met Andal Tangavel, de directeur van MASOS, in contact gekomen.
>
>Twee jaar geleden (2005) was ik in India. Ik wilde langs Andal Tangavel
>gaan, belde voor een afspraak. Ik kreeg zijn zoon aan de telefoon die zei
>dat zijn vader problemen had. Andal Tangavel, directeur van MASOS, is (tien
>jaar geleden) opgepakt vanwege kidnapping.
>Ik heb geen contact meer met hem. Ik ben er ontstemd over. Mijn vertrouwen
>is beschaamd.
>Ik denk dat hij gewoon stom is geweest. Niet kwaadaardig stom. Het is een
>fatsoenlijke familie. Zij leefden simpel en eenvoudig. Hij is zelf
>waarschijnlijk ook beduveld.
>
>In het begin van de jaren negentig is de vergunning van MASOS ontnomen. Ik
>wist dat de vergunning ontnomen was. De reden van het intrekken van de
>vergunning was voor mij onduidelijk. Het had iets te maken met strengere
>regelgeving, over het aantal kinderen dat naar het buitenland ging en het
>geven van bepaalde zorg. Tangavel heeft nooit iets verteld over het
>intrekken van de vergunning. De vergunning bleef vijf, zes jaar
>ingetrokken.
>
>Eind jaren negentig, ik denk 1998, kreeg MASOS de tweede vergunning.
>Ik gaf Tangavel adviezen toen hij deze vergunning kreeg voor
>(internationale) adoptie. Bijvoorbeeld dat hij goed de adressen moest
>bewaren van de biologische ouders. Hoe hij de alleenstaande moeders moest
>bijstaan, moest omgaan met kinderen.
>
>Ik heb Wereldkinderen benaderd of zij wilde adopteren van MASOS. Zij hadden
>al een ander kanaal in India, en vonden de provincie te ver, had dus geen
>interesse. Ik heb ook contact opgenomen met Noorwegen en Zweden.
>
>Ik weet niet of er kinderen van MASOS naar MSS zijn gebracht. Of dat er
>kinderen van MASOS naar Nederland gingen. Dat kan zijn. De kans is niet zo
>groot dat dat gebeurde. Anders had Andal Tangavel dat gezegd. Of er
>kinderen
>naar andere tehuizen gingen? Ik weet niet naar welke tehuizen. 50% van de
>kinderen was voor binnenlandse adoptie, 50% voor buitenlandse adoptie.
>Buitenlandse adoptie, daar waren ze erg op, want daar verdiende ze meer op.
>
>Vijf, zes jaar (2002) geleden is de tweede vergunning van MASOS ontnomen.
>Door verkeerde praktijken. In een bepaald geval was de herkomst van een
>kind
>onduidelijk. Ik weet daar niet veel van.
>
>Andal Tangavel is advocaat, een notabele, een handige vent. Hij had toen
>nog
>niets met adoptie te maken. Het was een idealistische man.
>Hij had een flink stuk land buiten Madras. Hij wilde daarmee geld
>verdienen.
>Hij had verschillende projecten. Indiase vrouwen maakte tapijten. Daarna
>had
>hij een bananenplantage. Daar is hij mee gestopt. Ik vond dat zonde. Zijn
>vrouw is onderwijzeres.
>
>In de jaren zeventig ben ik bij de plaatsing van een zonneboiler op het
>MASOS-gebouw geweest, dat was een project van Wereldkinderen.
>
>
>Mijn bezwaren tegen Meiling:
>
>- het voornaamste doel van Meiling is het zoeken van kinderen bij ouders,
>i.p.v. andersom
>- de kinderen die geplaatst werden waren ouder
>- ik hoorde het verhaal van Tjebbe Strubbe, schandalig natuurlijk
>- als er al klachten waren, dan was het over Meiling (deze klachten heb ik
>nooit genoteerd)
>- Meiling is een vrijwilligersorganisatie
>- de voorzitter van Meiling is een autoritaire flapdrol
>- bekijk RondomTien van ?97/?98
>- Ministerie van Justitie trok de vergunning niet in omdat de klachten over
>Meiling niet duidelijk en eenduidig genoeg waren
>- onduidelijke financiën
>
>Wereldkinderen heeft mij ooit eens gevraagd om naar twee kinderen te kijken
>in die regio (waar Meiling nu zit). Om te kijken of ze in aanmerking konden
>komen voor adoptie. De oudste kon niet meer. Het kind was zwaar gestoord.
>De
>jongste van twee kon nog wel in aanmerking komen voor adoptie. Zo?n
>kindertehuis wil die kinderen gewoon kwijt.
>Ik was dan ook verbaasd dat Meiling in die regio in India zat. Ik dacht:
>klopt dat wel? Zijn ze wel deskundig?
>
>
>Sazas Bhaskar (saras1955@yahoo.com) woont in Chennai en promoveert bij mij
>op adoptie.
>
>In Madras gaf ik lezingen over adoptie en ontwikkelingen van jonge
>kinderen.
>
>Ik ben bevriend met mrs. Andal Damodaran. Zij is de president van ICCW,
>Indian Child Center Welfare. Als ik in India ben, ben ik een VIP.
>
>In januari 1975  kwam ik de eerste keer terug uit India. Mijn vrouw en ik
>zijn daarna projecthulp begonnen. Het was in die tijd een andere sfeer. Ik
>had een container vol met spullen uit India. Die verkochten we vanuit ons
>huis. De opbrengst ging naar Wereldkinderen. De Wereldkinderen-winkel is
>gestart door mij.
>
>
 

USAID financed Report on Intercountry Adoption (Ambrose/Coburn)

US report on Intercountry adoption, financed by USAID

Ambrose
Mary-Ann Coburn

BCN: New Reports on Children without Parental Care from Save the Children UK andEveryChild; Report to US Congress; Stocktaking R

From: Kathleen Riordan <kriordan@unicef.org>
To: bettercarenetwork@listserve.com
Sent: Tue, December 22, 2009 11:06:23 AM
Subject: [The Better Care Network] New Reports on Children without Parental Care from Save the Children UK andEveryChild; Report to US Congress; Stocktaking Report on Children and AIDS; jobpostings, conferences and much more...


To the Better Care Network:

Please note that the link to our homepage is currently being repaired.  In
the meanwhile, our entire site remains available and can be accessed at
http://www.crin.org/bcn.  We apologize for the inconvenience.

Visit our homepage for two new reports from BCN Steering Committee and
Advisory Group members, Save the Children UK and EveryChild.

http://www.crin.org/bcn 

- Research shows the number of children growing up without parental care is
growing most rapidly in less developed countries.  Without adult protection
children are more likely to die at an early age, are at greater risk of
malnutrition, violence and exploitation and more likely to miss out on
school. Despite this, preventing the loss of parental care is frequently
absent from international development and aid policies. A new report from
EveryChild, Missing: Children without Parental Care in International
Development Policy, urges governments, charities and donors to cease
funding the unregulated expansion of children’s homes in poor countries and
warns that failure to keep children in families, out of residential
institutions and off the streets, will be another barrier to the
achievement of the Millennium Development Goals.


- Keeping Children Out of Harmful Institutions explores why governments and
donors continue to prioritize institutional care, despite the breadth of
evidence on the harm it can cause to children.  The report argues for a
range of interventions to support children within their own families and
communities, and for family and community-based alternatives for those
children needing care outside of their own families. This report challenges
governments, UN agencies, donors, non-governmental organizations,
faith-based organizations and others associated with the use of
institutional care to review their own strategies and take urgent steps to
care for and protect some of the world’s most vulnerable children.


Both of these reports are available in our library and will be featured on
our homepage in the coming weeks.  Visit http://www.crin.org/bcn. 


Other Documents and News


- Peter Bell, former Co-Chair of JLICA, responds to the New York Times
article “Study Suggests Orphanages are Not So Bad” in a letter to the
newspaper’s editor.  Bell’s response underscores the crucial role families
play in ensuring strong developmental outcomes for children and highlights
how family strengthening measures, such as cash transfers, can be used to
limit separation and institutionalization.  To read Bell’s letter to the
editor, visit our news section via the link below.


http://crin.org/bcn/details_news.asp?ID=21478&themeID=1003&topicID=1023 


- The Fourth Stocktaking Report on Children and AIDS calls attention to
children and young people living in a world with HIV and AIDS. It comes
four years after the launch of Unite for Children, Unite against AIDS, an
initiative dedicated to putting children at the heart of the global AIDS
response. The Stocktaking Report, a joint effort of UNICEF, UNAIDS, WHO and
UNFPA, reflects on the progress thus far in meeting obligations to
children, and offers authoritative data, evidence and recommendations on
how to accelerate action at all levels with particular guidance on ensuring
international support for social protection approaches are both
child-sensitive and AIDS sensitive.


To read the entire report, visit:
http://crin.org/bcn/details.asp?id=21472&themeID=1004&topicID=1025 


- U.S. Government and Partners: Working Together on a Comprehensive,
Coordinated and Effective Response to Highly Vulnerable Children: Third
Annual Report to Congress on Public Law 109-95 is now available online.
Public Law 109-95, the Assistance for Orphans and Other Vulnerable Children
in Developing Countries Act of 2005 was signed into law to respond to the
global orphans and vulnerable children crisis.  The report provides global
estimates of the number of highly vulnerable children; a summary of United
States Government (USG) assistance programs for highly vulnerable children;
a summary of progress coordinating the response among USG agencies; key
strategic issues and opportunities; priorities for 2009–2010 and beyond;
and a summary of the results and achievements of USG assistance.

The entire report is available now at:
http://crin.org/bcn/details.asp?id=21473&themeID=1001&topicID=1006. 

- ReliefWeb reports that according to Save the Children’s new report
millions of children are unnecessarily at risk of the dangers of living in
institutions, including rape, exploitation, trafficking, beatings, torture,
and psychological harm.  To read the entire article, visit
http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/SKEA-7Y3EPF?OpenDocument 

Jobs and Conferences
- Save the Children International has decided to launch a global Child
Protection Initiative (CPI) which seeks to promote a greater strategic
approach to child protection globally. The project will lead and encourage
enhanced collaboration and develop a common human resource pool for child
protection and common approaches for understanding child protection
throughout the international community.  Qualified candidates are
encouraged to apply to the following posts before 17 January 2010:

Programme Manager, Child Protection Initiative, Save the Children:
http://www3.rb.se/jobb/cgi-shl/User_Applicants.exe?action=VIEW_SPECIFIC_JOB&jobId=277&publishLanguage=0 


Fundraising Manager, Child Protection Initiative, Save the Children:
http://www3.rb.se/jobb/cgi-shl/User_Applicants.exe?action=VIEW_SPECIFIC_JOB&obId=278&publishLanguage=0 


- Upcoming Deadline! For Our Children is urgently looking for a European
Trainer in the area of producing and implementing standards for the
protection of children in safe family environment.  To review the terms of
reference, visit http://www.detebg.org/?cat=48&news=588. 



- Call for Abstracts! The National Research Conference on Child and Family
Programs and Policy will focus exclusively on policy issues pertaining to
child and family well-being. The conference, to take place 21-23 July 2010,
will draw in researchers from many disciplines including family studies,
psychology, sociology, social work, public policy, political science,
economics, criminal justice, child development; practitioners from social
and human services; and policy/decision-makers who are concerned about
programming and policy to support child and family well-being.  For more
information on attending or submitting an abstract, visit:
http://www.nrccfpp.org/ 



General Information

- As of December 22, 2009, the listserve has 1912 participants who are
working on issues related to the care and support of vulnerable children
across Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and the Americas.

- The purpose of the listserve is to enable members to exchange information
on matters of mutual concern. If you would like to share a document, raise
a specific issue, or reach out in any other way to the Network, please send
the information to us at kriordan@unicef.org. In the interest of keeping
messages consolidated, we will manage announcements on the listserve and
send out a few messages each month.

- We would like to involve as many people as possible who are concerned
with better care issues in the Network.  Please advise anyone who would
like to be added to the listserve to send us a message at
kriordan@unicef.org with "listserve request" in the subject line.

Alternatively, visit the homepage of the Better Care Network web site, and
click on the upper right box where it says "click here to sign up for our
email announcements".

http://www.bettercarenetwork.org 

Best,

Ghazal Keshavarzian and Kathleen Riordan
Better Care Network Secretariat
__________________________
Kathleen Riordan
Assistant Coordinator
Better Care Network
UNICEF - Child Protection Section
3 UN Plaza - Room 735-1
New York, New York 10017

212.326.7104
kriordan@unicef.org

_______________________________________________
Bettercarenetwork mailing list
http://mailman.listserve.com/listmanager/listinfo/bettercarenetwork