Home  

Baptism Certificate Alone Won't Suffice Necessity Of A Valid Adoption By Christians: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court dismissed a Regular First Appeal preferred against the Decree and Judgment of the Principal Sub-Judge, Alappuzha.;


The Kerala High Court held that a Baptism Certificate alone would not suffice the necessity of a valid adoption by the Christians. 

The Court held thus in a Regular First Appeal preferred against the Decree and Judgment of the Principal Sub-Judge, Alappuzha.

A Single Bench of Justice A. Badharudeen observed, "Baptism certificate alone showing the name of adopted parents would not suffice the necessity of a valid adoption and long association of a member of the adopted family would not also confer status of adopted child on a person."

The Bench elucidated that there is no prohibition in Canon Law for having a valid adoption but there is no personal law in India applicable to Christians recognizing adoption.

A bulwark for unwed mothers

By holding the man liable for the upbringing of his offspring, begat through non-marital sex, the judge has created a more level playing field for single mothers, and relief for children. 

The woman, whose lover had fathered two children but refused to pay child support, must have felt vindicated when Justice C.S. Karnan ordered him to pay maintenance, in the Madras High Court.

By holding the man liable for the upbringing of his offspring, begat through non-marital sex, the judge has created a more level playing field for single mothers, and relief for children. After all, sex and reproduction is between two people and both should be held responsible for its consequences, regardless of the legal status of their relationship.

Many of us have grown up watching Amitabh Bachchan films in which the eternal mother Nirupa Roy was discarded by husband or lover. In one, she had to bring up two children, one who became a criminal and the other a police officer, both seeking justice from a society which gave so much power to a man, that he could produce children but play no part in their upbringing.

These films narrated the plight of many unwed mothers in India who became second class citizens simply because they had sex without marriage, with or without their consent, were loving and responsible enough not to abandon their children. They ended up economically and socially marginalised.

'Mij is iets vreselijks aangedaan': Ethiopische Betty doet aangifte tegen de overheid voor adoptiefraude

'Mij is iets vreselijks aangedaan': Ethiopische Betty doet aangifte tegen de overheid voor adoptiefraude

  1. 01-04-2024 07:00
  2. Binnenland
  3. Auteur: Eveline Rethmeier

'Mij is iets vreselijks aangedaan': Ethiopische Betty doet aangifte tegen de overheid voor adoptiefraude

Betty werd als jong meisje geadopteerd uit Ethiopië

Bron: EenVandaag

Trump’s Family-First Revolution: Dismantling Clinton-Era Child Welfare Apparatus

Behind the Scenes Observations of the Child Welfare Apparatus:

  1. Observation #1: Rigid Timelines Harm Families
    The ASFA clock doesn’t always reflect real-life complexities. FFPSA’s approach acknowledges that parents often need more time and resources to address systemic or personal challenges.
  2. Observation #2: Funding Decides Policy
    When the federal government pays solely for foster care placements, that’s exactly what states will use. By paying for in-home parenting support and counseling, FFPSA shifts the paradigm.
  3. Observation #3: Scrutiny Breeds Accountability
    As more eyes focus on CPS, prosecutors, and family courts, expect changes in how quickly agencies move to remove children. The question is whether that scrutiny will result in meaningful reform or superficial compliance.

By Samuel A. Lopez, USA Herald

[CALIFORNIA] – Samuel Lopez here, reporting for the USA Herald. I’ve seen firsthand how child protective policies can shape, uplift, or dismantle families in crisis. Today, I’m bringing you an in-depth legal analysis contrasting two major federal child welfare statutes: The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) of 1997, signed into law by former President Bill Clinton, and the Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA), signed by President Donald Trump on February 9, 2018.

In light of President Trump’s re-election and his stated commitment to keeping families intact, scrutiny of ASFA is intensifying. Many argue that ASFA is inconsistent with modern societal values, particularly regarding parental rights. Below, I’ll explain why critics say it must be abolished or radically reworked, and how FFPSA’s family-centered approach offers a compelling alternative.

Trump’s Family-First Revolution: Dismantling Clinton-Era Child Welfare Apparatus

Proposed Federal Mandate: Revisit and Reunify

I believe President Trump should issue an order requiring states to re-examine cases where parental rights were terminated under ASFA-driven mandates. If the underlying concerns can be resolved with targeted interventions, then reunification must be explored. This not only respects the constitutional rights of parents but also recognizes that children often fare better psychologically and emotionally when raised by their biological families—provided it’s safe.

What This Means for Families and the Future

With President Trump’s re-election, child protective agencies across the country must confront a growing demand for transparency, fairness, and “family first” strategies. Parents in crisis should no longer be penalized for issues that can be resolved with targeted help. The era of automatic TPR based solely on rigid timelines is nearing its end.

To dive deeper into the issues covered in this report, join me on my Patreon page, where I provide in-depth legal analysis on matters affecting Americans every day. I’m here to illuminate your understanding of the law, offering legal insights, strategies, and opinions drawn from over two decades of experience in the legal field. As a former senior paralegal and legal analyst for top-notch law firms, I’ve acquired advanced knowledge that has helped prominent lawyers win cases.

Bipartisan letter sent to Trump concerning Chinese adoptions

U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Bowling Green, has joined House and Senate colleagues in a bipartisan letter to President Donald Trump, urging him to work directly with the Chinese government to resolve the bureaucratic impasse preventing American families from completing adoptions that had been approved before China shut down its intercountry adoption program.

The letter stated, “We write to you on behalf of hundreds of children and American families who have been devastated by the People’s Republic of China’s decision to halt its intercountry adoption program. We request that you act in the best interest of these children and engage the Chinese government to finalize these pending adoption cases.”

In the letter, the lawmakers stressed the urgency of the situation.

“The sudden termination of China’s adoption program in August 2024 only exacerbated our concern for these children’s well-being. Many of these children have special health care needs, and some will soon age out of care systems without the support of a permanent family. … We urge you to elevate this engagement and press the Chinese government to finalize pending adoption cases so these children may finally be united with their adoptive families in the United States.”

A U.S. State Department notice last November suggested China may allow adoptions to resume for families in certain countries. The lawmakers are making it clear: the U.S. must be included in any such arrangement. American families must not be left behind, and the administration must press the Chinese government to allow these adoptions to move forward through diplomatic channels, without intervention, hundreds of children remain in limbo, despite their adoptions already being approved.

The importance of engaging adoptees in the design and ownership of post adoption support services

in Adoptees Educate, Adoption Agencies, Adoption Education for Professionals, Australia, Critical Thinking in Adoption, Lived experience leadership, New Zealand, Post Adoption Support, Search and Reunion in Adoption, Transracial Adoption

On 20 Nov 2024, I presented online to a forum on Post Adoption attended by the Hague Central Authorities responsible for intercountry adoption as signatory countries. This forum is held yearly and shared between the Hague countries. The 2024 forum was hosted by the governments of Australia and New Zealand. One part of my presentation was to talk about the importance of engaging lived experience in the design and ownership of post adoption support services.

An excellent example of living the motto of “nothing about us without us”, is that in Australia, we intercountry adoptees have been very proactive in engaging with our federal government and in response, the Department of Social Services (DSS) have actively engaged our community to be consulted in the design of our post adoption services (PAS).

We’ve learnt how to do this better and better over time. For the first 5 year contract in which PAS was provided, the Australian government engaged an independent organisation to run our Community Stakeholder workshop consultations. The independent organisation also ran 1:1 consultations and small group discussions. For the Community Stakeholder workshops, as adoptees, we attended in person in each city of Australia where a white person facilitator stood up, with no lived experience and asked us questions about the post adoption support and what we thought of it.

Our feedback for these sessions told of the frustration we experienced as adoptees, to be engaged by a facilitator who had no idea of our experiences or the services. It slowed down the discussions because the facilitator had little idea of what we were talking about and it was like we had to educate the facilitator as we went. 

Italy's top court overturns 40-year ban on singles adopting foreign minors, sparking potential changes in adoption laws.

Italy's right-wing government headed by Premier Giorgia Meloni has opposed singles' adoptions in court, but the country's centre-left opposition hailed Friday's ruling as a “historic turning point.”


Italy's Constitutional Court ruled on Friday (March 21, 2025) that unmarried people can adopt foreign minors, ending a 40-year-ban on the practice and setting a precedent that could pave the way to allowing Italian singles to adopt from within the country.


Friday's court ruling declared unconstitutional the exclusion of singles from international adoptions under a 1983 Italian law, which allowed only married couples to pursue international adoptions.

According to Italy's top court, the exclusion of single people risked undermining "the effectiveness of the child's right to grow up in a stable and harmonious family environment.”

The court decision also reflects concerns among adoption advocates over a downward trend in Italy's international adoption over the past few years, due to increasing difficulties for couples in completing adoptions abroad and the high costs related to the lengthy process.

Mail ACT to Anke Hassel - Diffamierung/Adoption

From: Anke Hassel

Date: Mon 30. Mar 2020 at 19:46

Subject: AW: Diffamierung / Adoption

To: info@againstchildtrafficking.org

PS: Wo steht das denn mit den hohlen Kampagnen? Es steht sehr viel über kriminelle Praktiken auf der webseite und würde wenn überhaupt Menschen dafür sensibilisieren, sich mit den dunklen Seiten von Adoptionen auseinanderzusetzen. Aber das ist ja sowieso vorbei.

EVAP stellt Adoptionsvermittlung aus Äthiopien ein

Montag, 21. Juli 2014

EVAP stellt Adoptionsvermittlung aus Äthiopien ein

Der evangelische Verein für Adoptions- und Pflegekindervermittlung Rheinland hat die von ihm betreuten Adoptionsbewerber und Adoptiveltern unterrichtet, dass er die Vermittlung von Adoptivkindern aus Äthiopien einstellt. Die Nachricht kommt nicht überraschend sondern war seit längerem absehbar. Zum einen folgt sie einem langfristigen Trend der Reduzierung von Adoptionen aus Äthiopien weltweit. Nach Angaben des Statistischen Bundesamts kamen 2010 noch 97 Kinder aus Äthiopien nach Deutschland. 2012 waren es noch 61. Neuere Zahlen gibt es noch nicht.

Zum anderen gab es immer wieder Berichte über die schwierige Situation in Äthiopien selbst. Waren vor zehn Jahren noch Auslandsadoptionen in Äthiopien ein Symbol für Mitgefühl und Empathie, haben die Praktiken vieler Adoptionsvermittler und der beteiligten Behörden zu einem großen Misstrauen in der Bevölkerung geführt. Zu viele gefälschte Herkunftsberichte, zu viele Lügen und zu viel Geld im System in einem sehr armen Land. Das hat einerseits die Regierung veranlasst Adoptionen stärker zu regulieren und einzuschränken und andererseits den Druck auf die Vermittlungsstellen erhöht, hohe Gebühren für Lizenzen zu bezahlen.

Ist es ein Fortschritt, wenn nun keine Adoptionen mehr von EVAP durchgeführt werden? Das ist - wie immer bei dem Thema - ein zweischneidiges Schwert. Konkreten Schicksalen von Kindern, denen es in Deutschland eindeutig besser geht als in Äthiopien, stehen Fragen von Korruption, Zwangslagen, gefälschten Papieren und anderen Skandalen gegenüber. Und nicht zu vergessen die Kinder, die von ihren Adoptiveltern in den USA zu Tode gequält wurden. Der Film Mercy, Mercy hat (trotz der Fragwürdigkeit einer Dokumentation, die über Jahre Elend dokumentiert ohne Hilfestellungen auch nur anzubieten) das ganze Spektrum von Missverständnissen, falschen Erwartungen und Informationen, sowie fehlgeleiteten Sozialarbeitern aufgedeckt. Kann man dieses Verhalten überhaupt verteidigen? Nur wenn man Einzelschicksale höher bewertet als ein korruptes und im Kern fehlgeleitetes System. Diese Abwägung von Zweck und Mitteln wird uns wohl immer in der Frage der internationalen Adoptionen begleiten.