This week, the Government approved a policy paper and legislative proposals on international surrogacy and the recognition of past surrogacy arrangements.

So, what has the interdepartmental group that created the document proposed in relation to the future of international surrogacy?

In order to regulate surrogacy in Ireland, amendments to the Assisted Human Reproduction Bill will be required at committee stage of the legislation.

The AHR bill was created to regulate procedures such as in-vitro fertilisation and technologies like embryo screening as well as domestic surrogacy.

This week's announcement means that early next year, international surrogacy will be inserted into the AHR bill at committee stage, when amendments to the existing legislation are thrashed out.

Thiruvananthapuram: An infant abandoned by its biological parents

fearing social stigma over pre-marital pregnancy is to be returned to the

mother. The Child Welfare Committee (CWC) has decided to return the

baby as a DNA test proved its parentage.

As reported earlier the parents abandoned the baby fearing social

Promise Kids a Future (PKAF), a local adoption agency, is working with their orphanage in Africa called Noah’s Ark Children’s Home, to raise funds for adoption.

Their “Hope for the Future” campaign has raised roughly $8,500 at press time with a goal of $18,000 by Dec. 20.

“For the last several years we have had an anonymous donor who has reached out to say that they would give a certain amount if we could match it by the end of the year,” said Promise Kids a Future Director Jill Baker. “This (deadline) we set as Dec. 20.”

PKAF was started in 2006 by Baker, who has had a heart for international adoption.

“It’s just a beautiful thing to be able to provide (adoption) for people,” Baker said. “I love the idea of joining people who want children that don’t have families. As much as it is one way, it is the other; a child that needs a family. And, there (are) families that need children.”

On October 5, 2022, the Racines&dignité group filed complaints with the public prosecutor for the opening of a judicial inquiry into the main actors who participated in our forced exodus without the consent of our biological families. We publish the letter addressed to Mrs BECCUAU so that our request is taken into account vis-a-vis these crimes against humanity.

For the attention of Mrs Laure BECCUAU, Public Prosecutor of Paris

Madam Prosecutor,

We have the honor to inform you that we are a group of victims born in Romania in the 1960s. We created the Roots&Dignity group in order to denounce the establishment of a trade in children and violations of human rights. child of which we have been the object.

We are :

While families across the country prepare to gather for Christmas, Michael Hickey is facing another festive season forbidden from meeting his mother.

He is one of thousands of adopted Australians barred from contacting biological family members under so-called "contact vetoes".

Adoption lobby groups are fighting for an end to the vetoes, arguing they were "cruel" and "outdated".

Mr Hickey was adopted out as a newborn in Perth in 1960 when unmarried mothers were shunned and often pressured into giving up their babies.

He knew from a young age he was adopted and tried to find his biological mother when he was in his 30s.

Mustafa Chowdhury

One of the most important initiatives that Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman undertook post-Liberation War was enacting the Bangladesh Abandoned Children (Special Provisions) Order in 1972. Unfortunately, not very many people are aware of this initiative that is deeply significant for our national history.

After assuming power, Bangabandhu's first priority was to rebuild the war-torn country, but while doing so, he recognised the grave problem regarding the birth and simultaneous abandonment of the children who were born as a result of mass rape by Pakistani soldiers and their associates. All throughout 1972, newspapers such as the Daily Azad, Purbosesh and Daily Ittefaq referred to the war babies as "unwanted" or "enemy babies" of Bangladesh.

Bangabandhu took quite a different position and stood up for these babies, calling them manobshontan (humanity's children), echoing the same sentiment expressed by Mother Teresa.

Contrary to his administration, the Bangalees' indignation for the newborns displayed a more insidious form of bias prevalent in Bangladeshi society. People's attitude towards the war babies was shaped by a careful choice of terms, such as "unwanted" or "throwaway", the objective of which was to intentionally denigrate the status of war babies in their country of birth.

On October 5, 2022, the Racines & Dignité group filed complaints with the public prosecutor for the opening of a judicial investigation with the main actors who participated in our forced exodus without the consent of our biological families. We are publishing the letter addressed to Mrs. BECCUAU so that our request is taken into account in the face of these crimes against humanity.

October 5, 2022

For the attention of Mrs. Laure BECCUAU, Public Prosecutor of Paris

Madam Prosecutor,

We have the honor to inform you that we are a group of victims born in Romania since the 1960s. We created the group Racines&Dignité in order to denounce the establishment of a child trade and the violations of children's rights to which we have been subjected.

39-year-old Barbara Quee, one of the victims to whom 'Spoorloos' linked the wrong Colombian parents, has found her biological mother. "She thought I had died," she tells the 'Algemeen Dagblad'.

"She always thought I died shortly after birth"

Born in Colombia, Barbara was adopted in 1984 by a Dutch couple. Because Barbara wants to know more about her past, she registers for the Spoorloos program in 2005 in the hope of finding her biological parents. Her mother is found by the Colombian fixer (and, as it turns out, con artist) Edwin Vela, who has been matching adopted people with the wrong biological parents for years.

During the broadcast she is told that her mother cannot go public because she is in hiding from the police. "That would have to do with her identity, which would be used for criminal purposes," Barbara looks back. "A story in which I had many questions. Why was Spoorloos able to find her and the police could not?"

The program promises her to go after two brothers, but it remains silent. When Barbara meets another adopted boy in 2008, she decides to start a new search through Edwin Vela, to whom she has to transfer money each time. "It felt like a second chance. I asked Spoorloos for support, but that ultimately did nothing," Barbara continues her story.

Calling all overseas adopted Koreans: Take part in the 1st Survey on Human Rights in Korean Intercountry Adoption (KICA)

A note from the researchers:

You are invited to participate in a survey which is part of a study led by a team of researchers in collaboration with the Korean National Human Rights Commission on the status of human rights with respect to South Korea's intercountry adoption (ICA) program. The purpose of this survey is to:

Assess the status of human rights in ICA involving South Korean children

Identify types of human rights issues in such ICA

Dear PAO,

Two years ago, my brother and his wife, who both work on a cruise ship, legally adopted Den, a 2-year-old boy. I took care of Den when both were away because of the nature of their work. I grew fond of him over the course of time. Sadly, his adoptive parents died due to a shipwreck. As their next of kin, I took Den home. Since then, I have been taking care of my nephew without any problem until one day, the biological parents showed up at my house and told me that they wanted Den back. They told me they should be the ones who should rear their son now that the adoptive parents are gone. I told them that they were not his parents anymore and that, as his aunt, I should be the one who should take care of him. Who between us is correct?

poster

Rona

Dear Rona,