Home  

Busted in Bulgaria

 
Chapter Fifty-Eight
 
Busted in Bulgaria
(With a little help from the Cases)
“Come on down, the devil’s in town
He’s brought you sticks and stones to bust your neighbor’s bones
He’s stuck his missiles in your gardens
And his theories down your throat
And God knows what you’re going to do with it
‘Cause I certainly don’t”
-Matt Johnson
       On April 12, 2001, we received  this email from the director of the “Alaska agency,” Adopt An Angel:
Hi, how are you?  I am sorry for what happened in Russia to you.  That is so sad. 
The reason that I am curious about BB is because they kept saying that my agency was the reason why their clients couldn’t go pick up their children.  It’s kind of funny since my clients were picking up their children.  It was a complete lie.  Thanks for listening.
    Denise’s reputation and words were coming back to haunt her.
    This is not, as the alert reader will realize, the first time she’s trashed another agency to distract attention from the failures and misconduct of her own. EAC, of course, was subject to the same treatment in the form of a nonexistent lawsuit supposedly brought by Denise.
    But it also reminded of us of an email exchange we had back in early 2000, with Dellory Matthews, then public relations director for Focus on Children (a Wyoming-based agency forced by its own incompetence and  lack of preparation for the March 2000 rule changes to start working with Amrex after clients had been waiting well over a year to bring children home) told Daniel in another now-lost email that BBAS had been spreading innuendo about her agency’s Vladivostok program.
    Denise was reportedly telling prospective clients that FOC could charge less for an adoption from the same orphanage because they paid their facilitators so poorly. “In reality,” Matthews claimed, “their facilitator is just jealous of our facilitator’s connections.”
    Since BBAS’s Vladivostok program was subsumed into Amrex’s operations when Russia changed its ways, we never heard more about this and presumably the dispute is moot.
    Back to the present. By the middle of April 2001, continuing reports about Burgas and illegal dealings were beginning to filter out of Bulgaria. 
    A client of Adopt An Angel sent us a link to a story in the Bulgarian newspaper Standart, which was then picked up and translated on Bulgaria Online.
    Much, much more was to follow regarding Burgas, Kurjali and Buzovgrad and most tellingly, Valeri Kamenov and how all of these entities are interrelated (not that we have ever found any hard, evidential facts to link them together yet …but …):
    This was sent to us on April 19, 2001. We can’t vouch for the accuracy of this, and the translation could be better, but it was troublesome nonetheless. 
    The Director of Mother and Child Home in Bourgas, Dr. Zhivka Sabrutova has sold 20 kids to aliens last year.  The tariff was US $40,000 per child.  This is what a source from the regional division of the Security National Service communicated.  The Doctor was acting through a private, unlicensed company.  The investigator Ivo Dobrev [we don’t think this is any relation to Dobrev, BBAS’s Bulgarian attorney in Sofia] has already completed his inspection.  Dr. Sabroutova was charged for a crime on working place. The sentence would be up to 8 years of prison and taking off physician’s rights.
    The adoptive parents to be paid the huge amounts and signed the papers in the Bulgarian language.  They never suspected they were defrauded. The aliens were convinced that these were the relevant costs for an adoptive child under our laws.  The whole procedure in our country costs a total of 1,000 Leva.  The last who signs the decree for releasing from citizenship is the President.  The tariff for Denmark, Italy and USA is higher.  “We gave 60 children to aliens last year. I don’t have any violations.  Whoever thinks I do is supposed to prove this!” Dr. Sabroutova stated. 
    The scandal with the trafficking of children from the orphanages burst out in February, after an attempt to export 3 minor children out of Montana [an orphanage and city in Bulgaria – not the US state of the same name].
    The materials from the inspection in Burgas have already been sent to Sofia.  Other orphanages in the country are being investigated as well.
    Our goodly Dr. Sabrutova was being hung out to dry. But were these allegations true? Was she pocketing money? We seriously believed it, but not in the amounts being reported in the Bulgarian media.
   It appears that the reporter had no understanding of the American adoption process, or of the real expenses involved for us to adopt Bulgarian children. Was this what Denise Hubbard had meant when she said that the Bulgarian process would be just like the Russian process in a few years?
    Suddenly, on May 30, 2001, we were sent a startling bit of evidence that the bomb we had dropped on the Minister of Justice regarding our dealings with BBAS had hit its mark. 
   A friendly translator in Bulgaria emailed us a translation of a story from the Bulgarian newspaper Novinar (“News”) that had appeared in the original the previous day.
    BBAS, Valeri Kamenov and Daniel and Elizabeth Case were mentioned by name. (The language is as translated, so that’s why it may read a little oddly to native English speakers).
The National Investigation Service Intersected A Child Traffic Channel

    An officer from the military counter-intelligence has sold out abroad dozens of
children from the orphanages in Burgas, Karjali and Kazanlak [Buzovgrad], an investigation of Novinar has found out.
    The Capital Investigation Service has filed a lawsuit # 98/2001 against the
directors of the social establishments. Yesterday Sofia District Court removed
them from office, with view to not prevent the investigation. The organizer of
the network is the former Lt. Colonel from the military counter-intelligence,
Valeri Kamenov, who was the representative of the US agency BBAS. Upon the
search in his home, currency for 800,000 Bulgarian leva (about $ 400,000),
furniture for 650 thousand leva and 5 automobiles were found out. Kamenov
refused to provide explanation about the origin of the money.
    For each child adopted, a commission of $15-20 k has been taken, the
investigation of the National Investigation Service found out. Almost all of the
children had been sent to the USA.  Each child must receive 3 written 'decline-to-adopt' declarations saying that Bulgarian families do not want him, to be made available for international adoption. The directors collected the declarations without showing the orphans, saying that only sick and injured children have remained at the orphanage.
 
The Mediators Were Getting $15-20K Out of Each Adoption
 
    The prosecutor's ruling was based on an elaboration completed by the National
Investigation Service (NIS). It was assigned by the Supreme Cassation
Prosecutor's Service (SCPS) and it was under the personal observation of the
Chief Prosecutor Nikola Filchev.
    The reason for this elaboration has nothing to do with publications in the
press, the officer from the security services was categorical before Novinar.
The network disentangling started on April 7 1999 with a fax received at SCPS
from a German journalist. He [was] alarmed about an investigation completed by the
City Prosecutor's Office concerning trading of minor children.
    The German journalist Edmond Koch located an Internet address of a mediating
company and stated his will to adopt a Bulgarian child. He even came to
Bulgaria. The lawyer O’Brian, who is a representative of the mediating company
BBAS in USA, fell into the trap. Along with her, the police arrested the American resident alien of Bulgarian origin Anna-Maria Velcheva Gromann, and her
husband Dr. Oliver Gromann. The report made with a hidden camera was aired by the Munich TV channel PRO 7.   The case was widely published by the local mass media.
    Upon the search in O’Brian’s computer, information about bargains with children was discovered. She admitted to the police, that 15-20 thousands of dollars from each adoption were going to the accessories in Bulgaria. The leading figure there was someone with General's rank.
    As a result of the operative elaboration of NIS it was found out, that the word
is about Valeri Kamenov, 47 years old, born in Vidin, a former officer from the
military counter-intelligence. Upon Kamenov's arrest, currency in cash, furniture and five automobiles were found in his home, at the total value of over 1 million German marks. Kamenov was released against a bail of 20,000 leva, which he paid right away.
    NIS has found out, that Kamenov has been associated with Zhivka Sabrutova,
Yordanka Gospodinova and Ivelina Panova. After they appealed before the court,  they paid bails only of 3,000 leva for each, instead of the originally required 5,000.
    The paperwork kept in the orphanages was formally perfect, the cops found out. According to the Family Code, and Regulation # 17, of the Minister of Justice, a Bulgarian child may be adopted by aliens only if he has turned 1 year of age and there are at least three 'decline-to-adopt' declarations from Bulgarian families, after he has been seen by them. Then, the Minister of Health offers to his colleague at the Justice to grant consent for the adoption. The last word belongs mandatorily and solely to Sofia District Court.

    According to the statistics, 4,000 Bulgarian families are waiting to adopt a
child. But when some of them were visiting the mentioned orphanages, they have been told that only sick, injured, or minority children have remained there.
Without to be granted with the opportunity to see them, they were asked in a
persistent manner to sign the 'decline-to-adopt' declaration to take some of
these children.

    It has been found out, that the healthy children have been raised under special
conditions and separated from the others. The second law infringement on the part of the directors, that they have provided information to the mediators who prepared catalogues with pictures and data. The aliens have been told, that huge State fees have to be paid in Bulgaria.

    The arrested in Munich, O’Brian, has quoted on the behalf of BBAS (Building
Block Adoption Service) a price list with the following fees:
- Filing an application - 275 $
      - Program fee 3,000 $
      - Identification fee - 1,500 $
      - Bulgarian program fee (?!) - 12,000 $
      - Escort - the real costs incurred
      - Document fees - 680 $

    There were additional fees, too: Orphanage attendance, postal fees, fees for
re-adoption and finalization, fees for American lawyers, immigration fees,
translation of child's documents, travel costs of parents and children,
confirming the authenticity of the documents, standard medical tests upon
arrival in USA.

    There was one more complaint against the mentioned company BBAS. In a letter to the Minster of Justice, Teodosiy Simeonov, the American family Daniel and
Elizabeth Case have filed a complaint with regard to the procedure, according to
which they adopted a Bulgarian child.

    The media have been ma[king] noise about the necessity of a transparent  mechanism,  the need of Adoption Agenc[ies] and creating new texts in the Criminal Code concerning child trafficking. The latter needs only a suggestion from the Ministers of Health and Justice. No matter what the composition of the next Parliament is going to be, it is supposed that a consensus can be achieved quickly and easily. The lack of legislative initiative for normative solution of the problem logically raises suspicions, to which nobody should feel offended.
   WHOA! I got up that morning and read this with my mouth hanging open. What the…? 
   I had heard allegations that Dr. Sabrutova separated out the “healthy adoptable” children (read Anguel, N, and several other families in the U.S. and elsewhere) from the rest of the orphans in Burgas, but had no proof.  
    We have also been informed that of the “three families” that signed off on these children, many of them were the same three families who may have been friends of Dr. Sabrutova. 
   Also, rumor in Bulgaria had it that back in the late 1990s, Dr. Sabrutova would lie to birthmothers who brought their babies into the orphanage. She would tell them that they could come back in six months to reclaim their babies; but in reality, by that time, they had inadvertently relinquished their rights to them and were too ignorant to fight it. 
   These are strong, sickening allegations, and we really hope they aren’t true. The jury is out.
    We have, however, provided our own translation of the most comprehensive article about the affair that we received from Bulgaria, one that appeared in the newspaper Trud. It has some other interesting, and disturbing, details.
    But what was really interesting about this article was the mention of this “Candace O’Brien” attorney being arrested in Germany in April 1999. For some time, we had been trying to figure out how Denise had originally hooked up with Valeri in Bulgaria.
    She had made mention of “saving” the adoption of the very first Bulgarian child BBAS had placed from Buzovgrad with a family in Louisiana, who still post infrequently to the EEAC list. 
    Both the family in Louisiana and Denise had always been pretty mum on the circumstances, but once Denise let slip to Sue Corrigan that she had gotten a few Bulgarian clients from an attorney who had decided to stop the business. She had told another client something similar.
    Was there a connection here? Was this attorney’s arrest in Bulgaria what got Denise in the door and connected with Valeri in the first place? 
    The article mentioned that Candace O’Brien was arrested in April 1999 — the same month that Denise had begun “exploring” expanding her adoption work into other countries, according to the minutes of BBAS’s board meetings filed with the state of Ohio when her license came up for renewal
    The Bulgarian program was first mentioned in June 1999 and the first children began appearing in late June and early July on their website (Anguel and a few other Burgas and Kurjali inmates were featured).
   The first clients may have been Russian switchovers from Volgograd who were promised the impossible timeline of four to six months. The first family to travel went to Kurjali to visit their children in July 1999 with Richard J. Marco.
   This account was written up in the BBAS August 1999 newsletter, back when Denise was corralling us all in by touting the health of the Bulgarian children and the speediness of the Bulgarian process.

When Clients Attack - Part I

 
“No one taught them etiquette
It will wash all over me
Today I don’t need a replacement

Directori de la Adoptii si maternitati implicati in vanzarea copiilor

Cotidianul, 2001
 
Directori de la Adoptii si maternitati implicati in vanzarea copiilor
Tehnica traficantilor spune totul despre intentiile lor „umanitare“: Guvernul Romaniei are grija de copiii institutionalizati prin Comitetul Roman pentru Adoptii (CRA). Conform unor prevederi din Regulamentul CRA, o fundatie pentru protectia copilului nu poate intermedia o adoptie, decat daca ea este acreditata de catre aceasta. Pentru a obtine fara probleme un copil, mafiotii ii aranjau un certificat medical care scotea copilul bolnav, pentru ca mai apoi sa il ceara de la CRA, ca „repartizat nominal“. Aceasta metoda a iscat in ianuarie 1999 un scandal in care au fost antrenate doua fundatii, „Irene“ si „Stuart“ fundatii patronate de avocata Elena Bustea. Ea a obtinut mai multi copii spre adoptie, pe baza unor astfel de certificate, insa ancheta demarata in cazul celor doua fundatii nu a demonstrat ca s-ar fi facut ilegalitati. Doar unii ofiteri care au cercetat cazul au facut marturisiri presei, cum ca cele doua organizatii ale lui Bustea ar fi implicate in adoptii ilegale, insa, ar beneficia de protectia unor importanti oameni politici si ofiteri superiori din cadrul Ministerului de Interne.
In august 1996, Elisabeta Amzar, in varsta de 60 de ani, sefa Sectiei Nou-Nascuti a spitalului „Caritas“ din Bucuresti, impreuna cu subalternele sale, Laura Gheorghe si Ecaterina Balaceanu, au fost acuzate de mijlocirea unei adoptii ilegale. Florin Burcea, un copil care s-a nascut pe data de 21 august 1996 la spitalul „Caritas“, a fost abandonat in spital de catre mama sa, Daniela Burcea deoarece nu beneficia de fonduri materiale pentru a-l intretine. Dupa ce copilul a fost abandonat, Elisabeta Amzar si Laura Gheorghe au eliberat un certificat constatator fals, dar cu acelasi numar de inregistrare cu al celui original, pe care l-au trimis la Autoritatea Tutelara. In falsul intocmit de cele doua nu au fost specificate datele personale ale mamei naturale, iar semnatura medicului de garda, peste care a fost aplicata si parafa, a fost si ea falsificata. Asistenta Ecaterina Balaceanu a incheiat foaia de observatie clinica a nou-nascutului, trecand eronat domiciliul mamei si „uitand“ mentionarea datelor din buletinul de identitate al acesteia. Pe baza acestor acte, Florin Burcea a fost infiat de o familie de italieni care locuieste in Elvetia, fara acordul mamei naturale.
Cele trei au intrat atunci in atentia Biroului Politiei Criminale din cadrul Sectiei 10, fiind cercetate in stare de libertate.
Un alt caz care a facut valva este cel al lui Sorin Astratini, care acum doi ani era director la Directia pentru Adoptii din Primaria Sectorului 3. Fostul director a fost prins in flagrant in seara de 14 ianuarie 1999, cand, intr-un restaurant McDonald’s din Bucuresti a primit suma de 3500 de dolari de la reprezentanta unei fundatii care intermedia adoptii, pentru a aviza favorabil infierea a trei copii de catre cetateni straini. Astratini a fost denuntat tocmai de clienta sa, care a pus la dispozitia politiei doua casete audio, pe care erau inregistrate intalnirile anterioare cu Astratini. Din ascultarea benzilor s-a constatat ca, timp de doi ani, fostul director a pretins si primit peste 7000 de dolari, bani pe care urma sa-i imparta cu alti doi inalti functionari din Primaria Sectorului 3 Bucuresti, implicati in afacere.
 

HISTORIAL DE LA SITUACIIÓN DE ADOPCIÓN EN RUMANIA

HISTORIAL DE LA SITUACIIÓN DE ADOPCIÓN EN RUMANIA

(de octubre 2001 a abril 2002)

1. Octubre y Noviembre/2001: - Creación de un foro donde las familias adoptantes en Rumania pudieran transmitir con tranquilidad aquellas inquietudes, iniciativas, etc, en el dificil momento que viven (http://grupos.eresmas.com/lista/adprumania) Recogida de firmas de familias en reunión en Madrid. Presentadas ante el gobierno español y presidente rumano en su visita a España. - USA aporta 15 millones de dólares para programas de protección del menor con una duración de 5 años (ayudan a desarrollo legislativo junto con UNICEF y UE. - Se mantiene la idea del apoyo de la UE a la decisión rumana. - Gil-Robles manda una dura carta al primer ministro rumano en defensa de las adopciones. - Las familias envían comunicados a medios de comunicación, instituciones españolas y europeas y políticos denunciando la situación. - En Rumania aparecen noticias que 50 niños han sido adoptados ilegalmente por Italia, España y USA sin embargo nada más alega informes post-adoptivos fuera de plazo (generan corrientes de opiniión). - Apoyo de Asociaciones de Cora con cartas al gobierno. - Cora-Madrid envía escrito al grupo socialista.- Las respuestas de muchas de las instituciones (gobierno, defensor del menor, etc.) es tirar balones fuera: es asunto de Rumania con apoyo de la UE aunque afirman que la UE insta agilizar los trámites. -

2. Diciembre/2001: - Se autoriza iniciar en Madrid un segundo expediente. - En prensa rumana afirman la presión de Francia, USA, e Israel para levantar la moratoria. - Con ocasión del viaje de Aznar se desbloquea en diciembre 22 familias que tenían resolución judicial a falta de certificado de conformidad para completar la adopción; algunas familias llevan ya casi un mes en Rumanía acompañando a sus hijos. - Se establece que excepcionalmente puede haber adopciones por el interés superior del niño; sin embargo hay una veintena de familias con asignación que no prospera su expediente. - Prensa rumana intoxica con acusaciones de búsqueda en Israel de niños para tráfico de órganos. - La Senadora Inmaculada Loroño (nacionalistas vascos) pregunta al Ministro AASS sobre actuaciones en la moratoria. -

3. Enero/2002: - Circula un borrador sobre la nueva ley de protección del menor. - Sin embargo no hay avances sustanciales.- Las familias siguen escribiendo y presionando en la medida de sus posibilidades; se observa a muchas "quemadas". - El espíritu de la nueva ley es aplicación racional del Convenio de la Haya.

Directors of Adoptions and maternity hospitals involved in the sale of children

The Daily, 2001

Directors of Adoptions and maternity hospitals involved in the sale of children

The traffickers' technique says it all about their "humanitarian" intentions: the Romanian government takes care of children institutionalized by the Romanian Committee for Adoptions (CRA). According to some provisions of the CRA Regulation, a foundation for child protection cannot mediate an adoption, unless it is accredited by it. In order to obtain a child without any problems, the mobsters arranged a medical certificate for him to take out the sick child, and then to ask him from the CRA, as "nominally distributed". This method caused a scandal in January 1999 in which two foundations were involved, "Irene" and "Stuart", foundations founded by the lawyer Elena Bustea. She obtained several copies for adoption, based on such certificates, but the investigation launched in the case of the two foundations did not prove that any illegalities were committed. Only some officers who investigated the case confessed to the press, that Bustea's two organizations were involved in illegal adoptions, but would benefit from the protection of important politicians and senior officers from the Ministry of Interior.

In August 1996, 60-year-old Elisabeta Amzar, head of the Newborn Department at Caritas Hospital in Bucharest, along with her subordinates, Laura Gheorghe and Ecaterina Balaceanu, were charged with mediating an illegal adoption. Florin Burcea, a child who was born on August 21, 1996 at the "Caritas" hospital, was abandoned in the hospital by his mother, Daniela Burcea because he did not benefit from material funds to support him. After the child was abandoned, Elisabeta Amzar and Laura Gheorghe issued a false certificate, but with the same registration number as the original one, which they sent to the Guardianship Authority. The personal data of the natural mother were not specified in the forgery prepared by the two, and the signature of the doctor on duty, over which the initials were also applied, was also forged. The nurse Ecaterina Balaceanu concluded the clinical observation sheet of the newborn, erroneously passing the mother's home and "forgetting" the mention of the data from her identity card. Based on these documents, Florin Burcea was adopted by an Italian family living in Switzerland, without the consent of his natural mother.

The three then came to the attention of the Criminal Police Bureau within Section 10, being investigated at large.

Fees Impilo

Fees

Fees are charged for all professional services on a time basis. Our fees are charged at the "Tariff of Fees" for social workers in private practice set by SAASWIPP. Our fee for adoption work, and legal work generally, is R270.00 per hour. This includes direct screening, interviews, counseling, home visit appointments with relevant professionals, court appearances, and birth registration. In the case of an international adoption, the foreign fee for the international agency is payable in USD, and is payable directly to the agency concerned. The foreign fee would depend on the age of the child you are adopting, but is around $15 000.00 for a six month old baby. Any travel and accommodation expenses are for your own account. Foreigners wishing to adopt from South Africa, would be responsible for their own travel, accommodation and in-country expenses. Adoption fees are charged out at the rate of R260.00 per hour. Support services are also available at an hourly rate. We hope that this information has assisted you in your decision making process and any further questions you may have can be directly addressed to the social workers involved.

 

http://web.archive.org/web/20010602022324/www.adoptionsa.co.za/fees.htm

Annual report Danadopt - 2001

Annual Report 2001 of the independent institution DanAdopt

 

 

In 2001, a total of 248 children were taken home from six countries in Asia, one country in South America and four countries in Europe. At the beginning of the year we had hoped to attain a higher number of children.

The figures show clearly that the bulk of DanAdopt's adoption work is centred on Asia, where the large cooperative countries, India, China, Korea and Vietnam combined account for more than 80% of all the children we bring to this country. In Europe, the provision from Bulgaria still accounts for more than half the children taken home. 90% of all children were less than three years old when they were taken home. The gender distribution is close to equilibrium, with a small excess of girls.

Sar Kheng blames Kerry for adoption deal

Sar Kheng blames Kerry for adoption deal

Fri, 22 December 2000

Stephen O'connell and Lon Nara

Deputy Prime Minister Sar Kheng said he was pressured by US Senator John Kerry to

lift an official suspension on foreign adoptions to allow 16 Cambodian children to

Trafic cu copiii din "Poiana Soarelui"

Trafic cu copiii din "Poiana Soarelui"

Cateva asociatii care au ca obiect de activitate adoptiile au dat iama in Complexul ridicat de Ion Tiriac, la Brasov Trafic cu copiii din "Poiana Soarelui" -- Amatorii de adoptii din strainatate, care vin in contact cu copii din vilele complexului finantat cu circa doua milioane de dolari de Tiriac, raman impresionati de conditiile de viata si de instruire existente * Sub masca "grijii fata de orfani", cateva fundatii s-au gandit sa exporte, pe banda rulanta, copiii de la "Poiana Soarelui" * Intr-o singura sedinta, o instanta a incredintat cinci copii unor bogatasi italieni si americani * Avocatii lui Tiriac fac aproape imposibilul pentru a stopa diabolicul plan pus la cale de trei fundatii si Comisia pentru Protectia Copilului - Brasov * Avocatii au reusit sa suspende cateva sentinte definitive de instrainare a unor copii, judecate fara stiinta Comitetului Roman pentru Adoptii Traficul de copii din Romania este la ora actuala o realitate recunoscuta de toata lumea. La fel ca si fundatiile care pana nu demult aduceau masini straine in tara, scutite de taxe vamale, azi, au aparut, ca ciupercile dupa ploaie, zeci de fundatii, cu obiect de activitate: ADOPTIA. In spatele grijii fata de orfani si copii abandonati se deruleaza, in multe cazuri, un trafic, in toata regula, de carne vie. Pretul unui copil variaza de la 10 la 50 de mii de dolari, in functie de mediul din care provine "marfa". Circuitul acestor bani negri poate fi cu greu depistat de catre autoritati. Un sistem atins de coruptie Pentru a controla fenomenul, Guvernul Romaniei a creat in urma cu cativa ani Comitetul Roman pentru Adoptii (CRA), condus de un secretar de stat. CRA are in fiecare judet cate o Comisie pentru Protectia Copilului, care se ocupa direct de fiecare caz de adoptie. Din nefericire, aceste Comisii judetene, impreuna cu fundatiile care au ca obiect de activitate adoptiile, au format un sistem atins de coruptie. Pentru ca o familie straina, cu dare de mana, sa poata infia un copil din Romania, trebuie sa transporte la domiciul ei, pe cheltuiala proprie, functionarii acestor Comisii judetene, pentru ca ei sa poata efectua rapoartele sociale, care garanteaza ca familia adoptiva are un standard material potrivit pentru cresterea si educatia unui copil. Potrivit legii, perioada de perfectare a actelor necesare unei adoptii nu poate fi mai mica de trei luni. In conditiile birocratiei de la noi, familiile adoptive straine intra in panica odata cu trecerea timpului si fac orice ca sa dobandeasca copilul dorit. De aici si pana la plata unor sume mari de bani, nu mai este decat un pas. Miracolul de la Brasov In judetul Brasov, dupa decembrie 1989, omul de afaceri Ion Tiriac a investit aproape doua milioane de dolari pentru construirea unui complex de vile, dotate cu tot ce este necesar pentru cresterea unor copii abandonati de catre parintii lor, de regula, din cauza saraciei. Complexul educational "Poiana Soarelui", construit prin Fundatia "Casa Copilului" - Brasov, este apreciat de toti cei care l-au vizitat, drept un loc in care copii institutionalizati aici traiesc mai bine decat in majoritatea familiilor instarite din Romania. Cei 88 de copii institutionalizati la "Poiana Soarelui" au parte de cele mai bune conditii de viata. O armata de profesori se ocupa de educatia lor, mergand pana la lectii de arta, pian si computere. Prezenti la manifestari cultural-sportive din strainatate, acesti copii au demonstrat la Hanovra ca la noi in tara sunt conditii de nivel mondial pentru integrarea sociala a copiilor aflati in dificultate. Repartitiile rusinii In vara acestui an, pe baza unor dosare suspecte ale Comisiei pentru Protectia Copilului - Brasov, secretarul de stat, Alexandru Popescu, de la Comitetul Roman pentru Adoptii, a emis 22 de repartitii pe numele tot atator copii institutionalizati la Complexul "Poiana Soarelui", in favoarea a trei fundatii: CATHARSIS, "Miscarea Copiilor pentru Viitor" si "Speranta pentru lume". Aceste repartitii abilitau respectivele fundatii sa gaseasca copiilor nominalizati parinti dispusi sa-i adopte. Majoritatea repartitiilor au fost acordate Fundatiei CATHARSIS, patronata de Azota Popescu. Repartitiile semnate de secretarul de stat Alexandru Popescu au avut la baza dosare efectuate de Comisia pentru Protectia Copilului Brasov, condusa de Mariana Tiharau, aflata in complicitate cu Azota Popescu, de la CATHARSIS. Cu o viteza uluitoare, cei de la CATHARSIS, pe baza unor fotografii si casete video cu copiii de la "Poiana Soarelui", au reusit sa impresioneze cateva familii bogate de italieni si americani, care au venit in tara pentru a-i vedea pe minori si pentru a perfecta formele necesare adoptiei. De ce i-au ales cei de la CATHARSIS pe copii de la "Poiana Soarelui"? Simplu, in primul rand ca era mai usor sa mergi la pomul gata dat in rod, decat sa umbli prin tara si sa gasesti copii care cu adevarat traiesc in conditii mizere si care au nevoie de ajutor. Iar apoi, deloc de neglijat, familiile bogate din strainatate s-ar fi lasat mult mai repede convinse sa adopte un copil care canta la pian, este bine imbracat si hranit, decat un altul amarat ca vai de el. Acestea, adunate cu oportunitatea de a te deplasa regulat in strainatate (cel putin o data la sase luni), pentru a vedea cum traiesc copii adoptati in noile familii, instarite, s-a dovedit o tentatie irezistibila pentru cei de la Comisia judeteana. De retinut, nimeni, nici cei de la Comisia Judeteana si nici cei de la fundatii, nu au dezvaluit celor de la Complexul "Poiana Soarelui" intentia de a exporta acesti copii. Complexul ar fi avut tot dreptul sa stie ce se decide in privinta celor pe care i-a ingrijit ani de zile, in cele mai bune conditii. Totul s-a petrecut insa pe sest, intr-un secret bine pazit. Sentintele judecatoresti au mers pe sest, pe banda rulanta Pe baza repartitiilor CRA, Fundatia CATHARSIS, impreuna cu familiile de cetateni italieni si americani dispuse la adoptii, au introdus pe rolul sectiei civile a Tribunalului Brasov o serie de actiuni, prin care au solicitat incredintarea spre adoptie a cinci copii (patru fete si un baiat, cu varste intre 8 si 11 ani) aflati in Complexul "Poiana Soarelui". Intr-un singur termen de judecata, instanta, compusa din judecatorii Alina Stoian, Carmen Olaru si procurorul Alina Bica, a decis prin sentintele civile 431, 432 si 434, incredintarea celor cinci minori familiilor de italieni si americani. Apoi, dupa ce s-a scurs termenul legal de recurs, de 15 zile, sentintele au fost declarate definitive si investite cu formula executorie, pentru ca cei de la CATHARSIS sa dea buzna la "Poiana Soarelui" sa ceara predarea copiilor. Nimeni de la Complexul "Poiana Soarelui" nu avut stiinta despre aceste procese. Doar cei de la Comisia pentru Protectia Copilului Brasov, care au pretins in instanta ca sunt reprezentantii legali ai Comitetului Roman pentru Adoptii. Conform legii, numai CRA avea dreptul sa reprezinte interesele copilului in fata instantei de judecata. Complicitatea dintre cei de la Comisia judeteana Brasov si Fundatia CATHARSIS a devenit si mai evidenta cand, dupa investirea cu formula executorie a sentintelor de adoptie, secretarul de stat Alexandru Popescu, pus in tema despre tarasenie de catre reprezentantii Complexului "Poiana Soarelui", a descoperit ca nimeni din CRA nu a fost instiintat despre solutiile pronuntate, iar Tribunalul Brasov a "uitat" sa comunice hotararile date la adresa Guvernului din Piata Victoriei nr. 1. (va urma) http://www.ziua.net/display.php?data=2000-12-18&id=55393

Appeal for Uganda's abducted children

The winner of this year's Anti-Slavery International award has appealed for the governments of Uganda and Sudan to take concrete steps to end child slavery in northern Uganda.

The commanders fight over the BBC radio but the children fight on the ground and die

George Omona

More than 14,000 children are estimated to have been abducted by the rebel Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) since 1986, mostly from Kitgum and Gulu districts, and taken to southern Sudan to fight or serve as sex slaves.

It is estimated nearly 90% of LRA fighters are enslaved children - nearly 6,000 are still missing and it is not known whether they are dead or alive.