Home  

Manuel, Claudia and Luis arrived as the first Chilean adopted children in 1978. Today, they fear they were stolen

In Chile, children have been illegally adopted to the West. Kristeligt Dagblad has found the first to arrive in Denmark. Today, they are convinced that there were illegalities associated with their adoptions. The struggle to find the truth is not about revenge, but about becoming whole people By Mathias Sonne Mencke In the sky over Copenhagen on a cold December day in 1978, a plane made ready for landing. On board, five Chilean children were still too young to fasten their seat belts and to understand the turn their lives had taken. That they had left their country of birth and culture to become Danish citizens instead. At that time, they also did not know that they might be victims of illegal adoption. That some of their biological mothers would later in life insist that they had been stolen, just as thousands of Chilean children mysteriously disappeared from their families in the latter half of the 20th century. In the arrival hall of the airport, expectant Danish couples were waiting, who had long wanted a child, but for whom for one reason or another it had not succeeded. Through the adoption agency AC Børnehjælp, they were the first in Denmark to officially adopt from Chile in South America. A country that at this time was primarily known - and infamous - for dictator Augusto Pinochet's brutal treatment of political opponents. The country's political situation has probably not filled the arrival hall very much. For the couples, years of waiting time were reduced to minutes. Soon they could call themselves parents. Soon they were to meet the child they had read descriptions and seen pictures of, and whom they had been told in various terms had been abandoned by their biological families. At least that was the story Ole and Grete Kaalund knew. Manuel Francisco Humeres Salinas was the name of their future son. A four-year-old boy with dark hair and brown eyes who, according to the adoption agency, was born out of wedlock in the fall of 1974, after which he was abandoned by unnamed parents. He was perfect. And in a medical examination dated two years before arriving in Denmark, a doctor was mentioned in addition to the health professional considerations that their future adopted son appeared both "loving", "affectionate", "dark, but quite light" and not least as a child who "Falls easily to".

In 1978, Manuel Tom Kaalund and four other Chilean adopted children landed in Denmark. Today, several of them are convinced that there have been illegalities in connection with their adoption. For the same reason, Manuel Tom Kaalund has decided to find his biological mother so she can be sure he is alive.In 1978, Manuel Tom Kaalund and four other Chilean adopted children landed in Denmark. Today, several of them are convinced that there have been illegalities in connection with their adoption. For the same reason, Manuel Tom Kaalund has decided to find his biological mother so she can be sure he is alive. Photo: Johanne Teglgård

The boy was named Manuel Tom Kaalund. He grew up in a villa in Lyngby in North Zealand, and one day, when he was old enough, he asked his adoptive parents why his original family did not want to know about him. They told what they knew and the adopted son was silent. Being left on a bench in a park by unknown parents does not leave much room for in-depth questions. The problem is just that parts of the story are probably lies. A review of Manuel Tom Kaalund's adoption case reveals several documents that seem contradictory and misleading. And he is far from the only adoptee from Chile who is putting together a puzzle where the pieces do not fit. Two others who were on board the plane in 1978 are Luis Vad-Nielsen, who ended up with a family in Strøby Egede near Køge, and Claudia Alejandra Svane, who came to live in Brønderslev in Vendsyssel. Today, both are convinced that their adoptions were due to a deception. The suspicions are due in particular to the fact that their biological families have told them that they were stolen, but also documents concerning the mediation of adopted children between Denmark and Chile under the Pinochet regime, which Kristeligt Dagblad has been given access to, show, This is the story of missing Chilean children who may have ended up in Denmark. It is the story of a dictatorship state from which children disappeared, of a Danish system that received adopted children without questioning the documentation. And then there is the story of adopted children who have grown up and are looking for answers. “All my life I have thought that my biological mother gave up on me. And for that reason, I did not want to search for her. Now I can not help it. The thought that I might have been stolen against her will I cannot bear. I myself have children and think about what trauma she must have. I want to find her so she can see I'm alive. Both for my own sake and hers, ”says Manuel Tom Kaalund. The suspicion of fraud in the Danish adoption cases from Chile has been nurtured by a Chilean commission of inquiry that has unequivocally determined that children from the 1950s until the late 1990s disappeared as part of illegal adoptions to the West. In all, the Chilean authorities estimate that at least 8,000 children disappeared under suspicious conditions during Augusto Pinochet's military dictatorship from 1973 to 1990. NGOs estimate that number is much higher. The adoptions, according to the commission, involve the entire Chilean system: from judges and lawyers to social workers, health professionals, orphanages and the Catholic Church, and in the wake of the cover-up, the Chilean government has launched an investigation for prosecution. Self-justice has attracted attention in most of the western world, and in February the Swedish Minister of Social Affairs, Lena Hallengren, stated in the daily newspaper Dagens Nyheter, that the country's government wants a bullet hole of the overall Swedish adoption practice over four decades. And in Denmark, in the autumn, the National Board of Appeal most unusually called on all adopted children from Chile with suspected illegalities regarding their adoption to make contact. One of the adoption cases that the National Board of Appeal is reviewing at the time of writing is Manuel Tom Kaalunds. We will return to that. First a trip to Chile, where for years the suspicion of missing children was known. In newspaper articles you could read about mothers who claimed that their children had been stolen, just as viewers in the Chilean counterpart to the DR program "Traceless" could often observe how adopted children's stories about the reasons behind their adoptions did not match the biological family interpretations. However, the testimonies did not resonate with the population. The biological mothers often came from poor backgrounds, and the allegations of fraud and child abduction lack credibility. It was therefore not until 2014, when the Chilean media Ciper was able to document that a group of children allegedly declared stillborn under the Pinochet regime had in fact been adopted to the West without the permission of their parents. The births and subsequent adoptions were led by a Catholic priest who, in conjunction with several doctors, removed babies from mothers at birth and then told them that their infants were stillborn. This often happened to women from more affluent, conservative families, where births out of wedlock were considered shameful. And in his defense, the priest maintained that he was only doing what the fathers of the daughters had asked him to do. The revelations started an avalanche. Associations such as Nos Buscamos (we are looking for each other) and Hijos y Madres del Silencio (Children and Mothers of Silence) arose and mobilized hundreds of mothers with the common denominator that they had all lost a child under mysterious circumstances. The frustrations of the population grew, and the Chilean parliament took the consequence and set up the aforementioned commission, which, based on thousands of testimonies from mothers, relatives, lawyers and social workers, stated that families have been systematically deprived of children for adoption. The Commission identified four common methods used by doctors and social workers, among others, to provide for children. Common to them was that the mothers in question were in more or less defenseless positions. The first method was for the social authorities to readily declare parents unfit and forcibly remove their children, after which the children disappeared or were declared dead. The second method was that, for example, the authorities or the church "enticed" or "blackmailed" the poor to sign papers they did not understand the meaning of. Third method was sheer kidnapping of children. And lastly, many mothers experienced that their children were lied to dead after births or hospitalizations.

In her spare time, Claudia Alejandra Svane has helped other adoptees find their biological origins. It is hard mentally to shake up the past, she says, and mentions that she knows several who over the years have struggled with, for example, mental problems or abuse.In her spare time, Claudia Alejandra Svane has helped other adoptees find their biological origins. It is hard mentally to shake up the past, she says, and mentions that she knows several who over the years have struggled with, for example, mental problems or abuse. Photo: Johanne Teglgård

One of those who was lied to dead was two-year-old Claudia Alijandra Gallardo Vergara. She was later given the name Claudia Alejandra Svane, when she came to Denmark and moved in with her adoptive parents in Brønderslev in 1978. She describes growing up in North Jutland as “someone you can not put a finger on. It was safe and full of love. ” "Still," she says, "have I always felt a rootlessness and from an early age asked myself self-blaming questions, such as is it my own fault that my biological parents did not want me?". Eventually, Claudia Alejandra Svane acknowledged that she had to have certainty if she was to be able to move on with her life. She reviewed her adoption case and found that she was apparently born out of wedlock and that her biological mother had handed her over to the state orphanage Casa Nacional del Niño in Chile's capital, Santiago. A place with which the then adoption agency AC Børnehjælp had established a collaboration in 1978, and which up to and including 1981 approved 76 away adoptions to Denmark. However, the fruitful collaboration came to an abrupt end. Access to documents in the dissemination of Chilean children to Denmark shows that AC Børnehjælp and Casa Nacional del Niño immediately suspended the collaboration in 1982 "on the basis of suspicion of illegal behavior". Apparently, it was the Chilean authorities themselves who suspended the dissemination, as Chilean media, according to a document from the Danish embassy in Santiago, described illegal "child traffic". AC Børnehjælp's Christmas card for potential adopters the same year did not mention the suspension of the Chilean adoption agency and the suspicion of irregularities. It was not until the following year that it was established that the communication had been "reopened", but "certainly not without problems, and that only a small number of children are still coming". Of the total of 111 Chilean adopted children who have come to Denmark over time, Manuel Tom Kaalund, Claudia Alejandra Svane, Luis Vad-Nielsen and 73 other children arrived from Chile before the placement from the orphanage was suspended. It was the then Directorate of Civil Justice, which supervised the Danish adoption agency in the 1970s and 1980s. However, there is nothing to indicate that the Danish adoptive families were informed of the suspicion, or that the official team "reacted" to the suspicion. The National Board of Appeal writes this in an email response to the Ministry of Social Affairs and the Interior, as Kristeligt Dagblad has seen. AC Børnehjælp is today merged with DanAdopt under the name DIA - Danish International Adoption. Here, on the basis of the new information, the adoption agency from Chile has been reviewed and "no information or articles have been found that illegal activities have taken place at Casa Nacional del Niño". In a statement sent to the National Board of Appeal, however, the DIA writes that in the "cases from Casa National del Niño it is not primarily stated whether consent has been given or not" from the biological parents. Founder and director of the organization Chilean Adoptees Worldwide Alejandro Quezada calls Casa Nacional del Niño one of the most "powerful" children's institutions at any given time. He himself was adopted to the Netherlands in 1979, after he, according to his biological family, was lied to dead for a health check shortly after birth. About the state orphanage Casa Nacional del Niño, he says that "I have not yet come across an adoption from there, where there have been no elements of deception beyond the dissemination". Both Manuel Tom Kaalund, Claudia Alejandra Svane and Luis Vad-Nielsen lived at Casa Nacional del Niño before coming to Denmark. At the same time, their adoptive parents were represented by the same lawyer in Chile: Maria Luisa Avendaño. A well-known name in the Scandinavian adoption agency from Chile in the 1970s and 1980s. In 2019, she thus appeared in a comprehensive reconstruction, where the investigative Chilean media Ciper documented, among other things, how Chilean lawyers coordinated with day care workers and social workers to collect infants from orphanages, hospitals and poor homes, after which they ended up in Sweden. Of course , Claudia Alejandra Svane did not know all this when she started looking for her biological family a little over 20 years ago. She trusted that the information in her adoption papers was truthful and that she had truly been given up. If one is to believe Claudia Alejandra Svane's biological mother, Viviana Vergara, however, that information is a lie from end to end. She never gave up her daughter for adoption. On the other hand, throughout her life she has believed that her daughter died when she was two years old. The alleged fraud happened one day, Viviana Vergara took her daughter to the emergency room to treat a wound that had become inflamed. The mother's cousin took her to the hospital and confirms the story. The daughter was hospitalized, and the next day Claudia Alejandra Svane's mother and aunt came to pick her up. They collapsed when a doctor told them the daughter was dead. The mother shouted and screamed and demanded to see the body, but the doctor refused. The daughter's body was to be used for research. For the following time, Viviana Vergara came daily to have the body of her daughter handed over, but each time she went home empty-handed. Eventually, she realized that her two-year-old daughter was dead. "Imagine that I show up after she thought I had been dead for so many years. It was like blowing up a bomb in her life. She actually had a nervous breakdown and was hospitalized, ”says Claudia Alejandra Svane, who is now 45 years old. The two underwent DNA tests that confirmed the relationship, and Claudia Alejandra Svane managed to be reunited with her biological mother and little brother via video service Skype, before the mother died shortly after. Today she helps other Danes who were adopted from Chile to find their origin. A clarification work that she believes the Danish state should be involved in. "Even though I know my story, I think that we as a country need to find out what's head and tail in all this, so that we can reach a reasonable agreement on our storytelling. For many, the suspicion of being stolen is traumatic, and here it is important to remember that it is not only us adoptive children, but also our adoptive families and the biological families who have been led behind the light, ”she says. That the demand for children for adoption in Denmark in the 1970s and 1980s exceeded the supply can be read in the letters the adopters on the country's waiting lists received. In 1978, for example, the office manager at AC Børnehjælp wrote that “unfortunately we must realistically realize that there is a growing disparity between the number of applicants who want to adopt a child from abroad and the number of children available for adoption ( ...). On the other hand, we are under constant pressure from our contacts abroad to also be able to place slightly older children in the age group 3-6 years and possibly 7 years. ”

Over | Ibyang

Ibyang Belgium vzw is een vereniging die als belangrijkste doel heeft om de contacten tussen Koreaanse geadopteerden en hun familieleden te bevorderen. We treden ook op als belangevereniging en aanspreekpunt voor de noden en vragen die weerklinken vanuit de Koreaanse groep adoptiekinderen die vanaf de jaren '50 naar België kwamen.

We promoten actief de sociaal-culturele uitwisseling tussen België en Zuid-Korea via recreatieve en informatieve activiteiten, en gaan hiervoor samenwerkingen aan met binnenlandse en internationale partners.

Ibyang Belgium vzw is a Belgian based association whose main goal is to promote contacts between Korean adoptees and their family members. We also act as a lobby group that watches over the rights of Korean adoptees in Belgium. As a point of contact we resonate with the needs and questions from the many Korean adopted children who came to Belgium since the 1950's.

We actively promote the social and cultural exchange between Belgium and South Korea through recreational and information activities. For this purpose we enter into collaborations with the Korean Embassy in Belgium, domestic and international partners.

.

Legal Vacuum In Respect Of Adoptions Carried Out By Christian Parents Prior To 2016: Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre

The Delhi High Court has granted protection to a US-based Indian Christian couple,

apprehending legal action for adopting a child in India in the year 2014, under the Hindu

Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956.

A Single Bench of Justice Pratibha M. Singh noted that prior to coming into effect of the

Juvenile Justice Model Rules in 2016, there was no law enabling/ governing adoption of a child

ISS_IRC_Director_Job_Description.pdf

Job Vacancy

Established in 1924 in Geneva, Switzerland, International Social Service (ISS) is an international NGO with

ISS strives to protect, defend, and support children, families, and individuals separated as a consequence

of cross-border migration. ISS aims to ensure that respect for human rights is accorded to every individual,

especially to children.

More adoption and foster parent leave for tenured civil servants

The federal government wants to align adoption and foster parental leave for statutory officials with contract officials and the private sector. The proposal is on the agenda of the Council of Ministers on Friday, Minister of Civil Service Petra De Sutter (Groen) reports.

Tenured officials adopting a child under the age of 10 have so far been entitled to six weeks of adoption leave per parent. The maximum age of the adopted child has now been raised to 18 years, and those who adopt multiple children will receive an extra two weeks' leave.

Statutory officials who take in a foster child for a long time have not yet been entitled to foster parent leave. From this year, they will be given six weeks leave per parent for every minor foster child that they take care of for more than six months.

Finally, this year there will be an extra two weeks for both adoption and foster parent leave, to be divided among the parents. That extra leave will be progressively increased until 2027 to five extra weeks of leave.

The foster parent and adoption leave of permanently appointed civil servants is thus equated with the leave of contract workers in the federal public services and of employees in the private sector. In addition, the reform is also important for the work-life balance of civil servants, says Minister De Sutter. “Creating a home for a child, some of whom come from problematic backgrounds, requires attention and commitment from the new parents and it takes time,” she says. "We want to give that to the parents and the child too."

Ethical Challenges Remain in The World of Private Adoptions

Adoption practices continue to challenge the ethics of social workers due to myriad conflicting interests which have existed since the practice began. Dangerous informal child care arrangements in the early to mid 1900s have been replaced by a patchwork of state and federal laws, regulations and child care practices meant to serve the best interests of everyone associated with adoption, but we continue to allow for ethically concerning “wrongful” adoptions.

The transition to formal adoption practices was initiated in the early 1980s, with adoption case law establishing best legal practices for improving positive outcomes for children and families. Starting in 1981, the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) followed suit by formalizing standards for child welfare with the publication of the NASW Standards for Social Work Practice in Child Protection.

adoptions

Daniel Pollack, Yeshiva University’s School of Social Work.

Over the last two decades, the NASW Code of Ethics and the child welfare practices have evolved and stronger assessment practices related to approval of adoptive parents have been established. Despite these advances, social workers have found themselves observing or being caught up in ethically challenging adoption practices that have continued to lead to unethical family disruptions and poorly implemented adoption policies, all of which have created more “wrongful adoptions” and a continued mistrust of the profession.

Protocol for Responding to Allegations of Illicit or Illegal Practices in Intercountry Adoption

What to do if you think your, or your child’s, intercountry adoption was illegal or illicit

In Australia, intercountry adoptions are facilitated under the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (the Hague Convention)(link is external). This helps preserve the safety, rights and interests of children. The rights and best interest of the child are central to any decisions made about a child’s adoption.

The Australian Central Authority (ACA) and State and Territory Central Authorities (STCAs) are aware of the risks involved in intercountry adoption and only partner with countries who adhere to the Hague Convention.

If concerns or allegations about illicit and illegal adoption practices are raised we have the Protocol for Responding to Allegations of Illicit or Illegal Practices in Intercountry Adoption (the Protocol). It has been developed by the ACA for intercountry adoption under the Hague Convention, in consultation with STCAs. The protocol is reviewed periodically to make sure it adheres to best practice in preventing and addressing illicit or illegal practices in intercountry adoption.

What is the Protocol?

Department says consulting firm was hired due to 'urgency' in setting up mother and baby home redress scheme

AN OUTSIDE CONSULTING firm was hired by the government to “expedite” the process of setting up a redress scheme for survivors of mother and baby homes, the Department of Children has said.

The government has hired OAK Consulting to oversee the consultation process at a cost of €20,000.

The process was launched by Children’s Minister Roderic O’Gorman last week. The closing date for receipt of written submissions is 31 March.

OAK will also facilitate a number of “consultation events with interested parties” between 22 March and 29 March. These meetings will be online due to Covid-19 restrictions.

The meetings are scheduled to last for three hours each, and attendees can bring a “support person” with them.

Only 34 children were adopted in Queensland last year

Only 34 children were adopted in Queensland over the past year – an 80 per cent plunge from the total two decades ago.

Adoptions have fallen across the state from the 170 children adopted in 1995-96.

Of the 34 children adopted in Queensland in 2019-20, 11 were adopted from overseas, according to data due to be released by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) on Wednesday.

There were 12 “local” adoptions in Queensland, where children born or permanently living in Australia had no prior contact or relationship with the adoptive parents, while 11 were “known” adoptions.

Queensland politicians are set to debate legislation, sparked by the tragic death of toddler Mason Jet Lee, that would make adoption a third option in deciding how to achieve permanency for a child, except for an Indigenous child.

Fake documents hamper Dutch-Indonesian adoptees' search for birth parents This article was published in thejakartapost.com with

Bud Wichers, a photo and video journalist from the Netherlands, has traveled the world to capture major conflicts and wars, including in Syria, Gaza, Libya and Ukraine. “I became a photographer because I believe in social justice, connecting people to make the world a better place,” he said recently. “If I weren’t adopted, those feelings might not have been so strong.” Bud was among 3,040 Indonesian children who were adopted by Dutch nationals between 1973 and 1983. While he acknowledged that his adoptive Dutch parents had given him the opportunity of a better life, he still longs to know his birth parents. For years he has attempted to retrace his roots in Jakarta. His adoption documents identify him as Budiman, born in 1977 to a couple named Rusdi and Mustiah who lived in Gang V of Jl. Dukuh Pinggir in Tanah Abang, Central Jakarta. His Dutch parents adopted him from Kasih Bunda orphanage — now Loka Kasih — on Jakarta’s outskirts in 1978. Bud has visited both places but found no substantial information. Last year on Nov. 20, he once again visited his birth parents’ supposed home address on Jl. Dukuh Pinggir, a kampung located just behind luxurious shopping malls and office towers along the Hotel Indonesia traffic circle. An elderly woman named Esni said Bud’s mother, Mustiah, had lived there but had moved to Tangerang, Banten, with her daughter several years ago. This information gave him a surge of hope – but it did not last long. Read also: Indonesian woman in Netherlands writes to long-lost biological mother in viral open letter Weeks later, Bud connected with another Indonesian adoptee in the Netherlands who had the same address on her adoption document. “She had the same address on her paper around the same time period. Only different parents’ names on the paper,” Bud said. DNA tests showed that they were not related. “I believe […] my adoption papers were doctored; I’m not sure about anything in those papers anymore,” he said. “I have no idea where to go from here," he said. Bud Wichers as a baby at the Bunda Kasih orphanage, now Loka Kasih, in Tangerang, Banten, in around 1978, just before his adoption to a Dutch couple. (Courtesy/Bud Wichers) Long-overdue apology Falsified adoption documents have become a significant hurdle for many Indonesian adoptees trying to track their roots. Ana Maria van Valen, the cofounder of the Mijn Roots Foundation, said forged documents often indicated that the adoptions were illegal. Mijn Roots has reunited 38 Indonesian adoptees with their birth parents and is helping another 87 to date. “We have found 38 mothers. Sometimes we found out that the story is not what is stated in the papers. Some mothers never gave up their babies,” Ana said. “In my case, my mother never wanted to give me up. My mother asked a lady to take care of me so she could work in Jakarta. When she came back, I was gone. But in the papers, it is stated that my mother had given her permission [for the adoption].” At the age of 18, Ana Maria van Valen (left) reunites with her mother in Bogor, West Java. Ana and Christine Verhaagen – both Indonesian adoptees in the Netherlands – cofounded the Mijn Roots Foundation in 2014 in efforts to reunite adoptees with their birth families. (Courtesy/Ana Maria van Valen) In 1983, the Indonesian government uncovered a slew of illegal adoption cases, implicating orphanages, birth clinics and midwives, and subsequently banned overseas adoptions. But in the Netherlands, it took almost four decades for the Dutch government to admit the wrongdoings. For years, adoptees from Indonesia, Colombia, Brazil and several other countries repeatedly called on the Dutch government to investigate and apologize for its problematic adoption process. The long-overdue apology finally came on Feb. 8 following a government commission’s investigation into adoptions from Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh from 1967 to 1998. The commission found that some children had been stolen or bought from their birth parents under economic pressure or false pretenses. The investigation also detailed different types of structural abuses, including Dutch officials overlooking falsified documents, fraud and corruption. The findings prompted the Dutch government to suspend adoptions from abroad. “When it comes to mistakes made in the past, adoptees should be given recognition, and they should be able to rely on our help and assistance in the present,” Legal Protection Minister Sander Dekker said in a statement in February. The Dutch government said adoptees would receive support from a national expertise center during all stages of the search for their roots, as well as sociopsychological and legal assistance. Ana and Bud welcomed this move, with Bud saying: “I believe it’s a big step in the right direction from the Dutch government. I’m grateful for that.” The Dutch government has allocated 1.2 million euro (US$1.43 million) to support adoptees from different countries, including Indonesia. “They will now give funding to organizations that support adoptees, but not for individual searching cases. We have applied for that, and the [related] ministries are still discussing this,” Ana said. “An adoptee could spend thousands of euro for tickets, accommodation, searching, mental healthcare, DNA tests and other [requirements].” Not always a happy ending At Mijn Roots, Ana and her team try their best to provide emotional support to adoptees. Ana realizes that some Indonesian adoptees face questions about their identity, which often leads to depression and other mental health problems. Ana, who was adopted at the age of 2.5 years old, also faced similar problems. “Being separated from your biological mother and losing that special [bond] can be a traumatic experience. I know some adoptees who really find it hard to cope with that,” she said. “You come from a different culture, your family has different characters. You are Indonesian in the Netherlands. But in Indonesia, you feel more Dutch.” When an adoptee finds their parents, it does not always mean a happy ending. Adoptees may find it hard to adjust to the birth family’s culture — and sometimes their unrealistic expectations. “Sometimes the family thinks that the adoptee is very rich and they ask for [financial] support,” Ana said, noting that such expectations sometimes prompted adoptees to sever ties with their birth parents. Bud knows that finding his biological parents may not lead to a fairy-tale reunion. He also acknowledges that his search has become even more difficult with the discovery of what is likely false information on his adoption papers. Nevertheless, he will continue to look for his birth family in Indonesia. “I am thankful for the opportunities my adopted parents gave me, but I am also sad for my biological parents who never had a chance to raise me.”

This article was published in thejakartapost.com with the title "Fake documents hamper Dutch-Indonesian adoptees' search for birth parentsDiscarded puppy Locky's luck turns in Moscow lockdown". Click to read: https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2021/03/17/fake-documents-hamper-dutch-indonesian-adoptees-search-for-birth-parents.html?fbclid=IwAR0ggLo8BXtCV0AM99nGe_2xFLIW31aetjzM9EFZxiuX7eY5n2BVlb9IBvk.

Download The Jakarta Post app for easier and faster news access:

Android: http://bit.ly/tjp-android

iOS: http://bit.ly/tjp-ios